Observational Study on the Risk of Surgical Site Infection in Patients Undergoing Common Femoral Endarterectomy in Conjunction With an Endovascular Procedure Compared With Common Femoral Endarterectomy Alone

被引:0
|
作者
Walker, Hamish [1 ]
Chana, Manik S. [1 ]
Mandalia, Kavisha [1 ]
Kulkarni, Sachin R. [1 ]
Paravastu, Sharath C. V. [1 ]
机构
[1] Gloucestershire Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Great Western Rd, Gloucester GL1 3NN, England
关键词
Common femoral endarterectomy; Hybrid vascular surgery; Surgical site infection; VASCULAR-SURGERY; DISEASE; THERAPY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejvsvf.2024.05.003
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: A hybrid approach is being employed increasingly in the management of peripheral arterial disease. This study aimed to assess the surgical site infection (SSI) incidence of hybrid revascularisation (HR) compared with common femoral endarterectomy (CFEA) alone. Methods: This was a retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent CFEA or HR alongside CFEA between 2017 and 2021 including one year of follow up. The primary outcome was SSI incidence. Secondary outcomes included length of surgery, duration of admission, further revascularisation surgery, limb salvage, and death. Differences in outcomes were assessed with the Student ' s unpaired t test, chi square test, and Fisher ' s exact test. Results: A total of 157 groin incisions from 155 patients were included: 78 had CFEA procedures and 79 had HR procedures. No statistical difference was found between groups for age, sex, and indication for surgery. Surgical site infection occurred in five of the CFEA patients (6%) compared with seven of the HR patients (9%) ( p = 0.77). The HR procedures took significantly longer, with an average of 299 minutes compared with 220 minutes for CFEA ( p < 0.001). No statistically significant difference was identified for length of admission: median stay five days for CFEA vs. four days for HR ( p = 0.44). Major amputation was performed within one year in five of the CFEA procedures (6%) and fi ve of the HR procedures (6%) ( p = 1.0). Further revascularisation surgery was attempted in two patients in the HR group and six patients in the CFEA group ( p = . 17). No statistically signi fi cant difference was found in the one year mortality rate: eight CFEA (10%) and seven HR (9%) ( p = 0.77). Conclusion: Patients who underwent HR alongside CFEA did not have a statistically significantly increased incidence of SSI, despite increased surgical time. Using HR techniques enabled patients to have multilevel disease treated in one stage without an increased incidence of SSI. Crown Copyright (c) 2024 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of European Society for Vascular Surgery. This is an open access article under the CC BY -NC -ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Article history: Received 20 November 2023, Revised 22 April 2024, Accepted 6 May 2024,
引用
收藏
页码:116 / 120
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] Risk Factors for Surgical-Site Infection Following Common Femoral Artery Endarterectomy
    Derksen, Wouter J. M.
    Verhoeven, Bart A. N.
    van de Mortel, Rob H. W.
    Moll, Frans L.
    de Vries, Jean-Paul P. M.
    VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2009, 43 (01) : 69 - 75
  • [2] Common femoral artery endarterectomy in the age of endovascular therapy
    Elsherif, Mohamed
    Tawfick, Wael
    Elsharkawi, Mohamed
    Campell, Ruth
    Hynes, Niamh
    Sultan, Sherif
    VASCULAR, 2018, 26 (06) : 581 - 590
  • [3] Infection Risk Following Common Femoral Artery Endarterectomy Versus a Hybrid Procedure
    Langenberg, Jasper C. M.
    te Slaa, Alexander
    de Groot, Hans G. W.
    Ho, Gwan H.
    Veen, Eelco J.
    Buimer, Thijs M. G.
    van der Laan, Lijckle
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2018, 53 : 148 - 153
  • [4] The Role of Common Femoral Artery Endarterectomy in the Endovascular Era
    Nishibe, Toshiya
    Maruno, Keita
    Iwahori, Akinari
    Fujiyoshi, Toshiki
    Suzuki, Shun
    Takahashi, Satoshi
    Ogino, Hitoshi
    Nishibe, Masayasu
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2015, 29 (08) : 1501 - 1507
  • [5] Assessing the Perioperative Safety of Common Femoral Endarterectomy in the Endovascular Era
    Siracuse, Jeffrey J.
    Gill, Heather L.
    Schneider, Darren B.
    Graham, Ashley R.
    Connolly, Peter H.
    Jones, Douglas W.
    Meltzer, Andrew J.
    VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2014, 48 (01) : 27 - 33
  • [6] Clinical Outcome of Surgical Endarterectomy for Common Femoral Artery Occlusive Disease
    Kuma, Sosei
    Tanaka, Kiyoshi
    Ohmine, Takahiro
    Morisaki, Koichi
    Kodama, Akio
    Guntani, Atsushi
    Ishida, Masaru
    Okazaki, Jin
    Mii, Shinsuke
    CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2016, 80 (04) : 964 - 969
  • [7] Determinants of Success and Early Complications in Common Femoral Artery Endarterectomy: A Retrospective Study
    Quax, Marcel Libertus Johannes
    Eefting, Daniel
    Smeets, Herman Joseph
    SURGERIES, 2021, 2 (02): : 180 - 189
  • [8] Midterm Outcomes of Common Femoral Endarterectomy Combined with Inflow and Outflow Endovascular Treatment for Chronic Limb Threatening Ischaemia
    Elbadawy, Ahmed
    Ali, Haitham
    Saleh, Mahmoud
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2020, 59 (06) : 947 - 955
  • [9] Novel Common Femoral Artery Lesion Classification in Patients Undergoing Endovascular Revascularization
    Rabellino, Martin
    Valle Raleigh, Juan
    Guido Chiabrando, Juan
    Di Caro, Vanesa
    Chas, Jose
    Garagoli, Fernando
    Bluro, Ignacio
    CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2022, 45 (04) : 438 - 447
  • [10] Common femoral artery endarterectomy by eversion versus prosthetic patch angioplasty: a propensity-matched study
    Nasr, Bahaa
    Carret, Melanie
    Pluchon, Kevin
    Bezon, Eric
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2023, 64 (03) : 279 - 286