An experimental validation of a filtering approach for prompt gamma prediction in a research proton treatment planning system

被引:1
|
作者
Huang, Ze [1 ]
Tian, Liheng [1 ]
Janssens, Guillaume [2 ]
Smeets, Julien [2 ]
Xie, Yunhe [3 ]
Teo, Boon-Keng Kevin [4 ]
Nilsson, Rasmus [5 ]
Traneus, Erik [5 ]
Parodi, Katia [1 ]
Pinto, Marco [1 ]
机构
[1] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, Dept Med Phys, Munich, Germany
[2] Ion Beam Applicat SA, Louvain la Neuve, Belgium
[3] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Boston, MA USA
[4] Univ Penn, Dept Radiat Oncol, Philadelphia, PA USA
[5] RaySearch Labs AB, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
prompt gamma range verification; proton therapy; REGGUI; RayStation; filtering approach PG prediction; BEAM RANGE VERIFICATION; MONTE-CARLO; SLIT-CAMERA; PET VERIFICATION; RAY EMISSION; THERAPY; DISTRIBUTIONS; SENSITIVITY; RADIATION; FEASIBILITY;
D O I
10.1088/1361-6560/ad6116
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Objective. Prompt gamma (PG) radiation generated from nuclear reactions between protons and tissue nuclei can be employed for range verification in proton therapy. A typical clinical workflow for PG range verification compares the detected PG profile with a predicted one. Recently, a novel analytical PG prediction algorithm based on the so-called filtering formalism has been proposed and implemented in a research version of RayStation (RaySearch Laboratories AB), which is a widely adopted treatment planning system. This work validates the performance of the filtering PG prediction approach. Approach. The said algorithm is validated against experimental data and benchmarked with another well-established PG prediction algorithm implemented in a MATLAB-based software REGGUI. Furthermore, a new workflow based on several PG profile quality criteria and analytical methods is proposed for data selection. The workflow also calculates sensitivity and specificity information, which can help practitioners to decide on irradiation course interruption during treatment and monitor spot selection at the treatment planning stage. With the proposed workflow, the comparison can be performed on a limited number of selected high-quality irradiation spots without neighbouring-spot aggregation. Main results. The mean shifts between the experimental data and the predicted PG detection (PGD) profiles (Delta PGD) by the two algorithms are estimated to be 1.5 +/- 2.1 mm and -0.6 +/- 2.2 mm for the filtering and REGGUI prediction methods, respectively. The Delta PGD difference between two algorithms is observed to be consistent with the beam model difference within uncertainty. However, the filtering approach requires a much shorter computation time compared to the REGGUI approach. Significance. The novel filtering approach is successfully validated against experimental data and another widely used PG prediction algorithm. The workflow designed in this work selects spots with high-quality PGD shift calculation results, and performs sensitivity and specificity analyses to assist clinical decisions.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Design optimization of a 2D prompt-gamma measurement system for proton dose verification
    Han Rim Lee
    Jong Hoon Park
    Chan Hyeong Kim
    Chul Hee Min
    Journal of the Korean Physical Society, 2012, 61 : 239 - 242
  • [22] A Simple Approach for Experimental Characterization and Validation of Proton Pencil Beam Profiles
    Stasica, Paulina
    Baran, Jakub
    Granja, Carlos
    Krah, Nils
    Korcyl, Grzegorz
    Oancea, Cristina
    Pawlik-Niedzwiecka, Monika
    Niedzwiecki, Szymon
    Rydygier, Marzena
    Schiavi, Angelo
    Rucinski, Antoni
    Gajewski, Jan
    FRONTIERS IN PHYSICS, 2020, 8
  • [23] A deep learning approach for converting prompt gamma images to proton dose distributions: A Monte Carlo simulation study
    Liu, Chih-Chieh
    Huang, Hsuan-Ming
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 69 : 110 - 119
  • [24] Implementation of an analytical solution to lateral dose prediction in a proton therapy treatment planning system
    Bellinzona, E. V.
    Landry, G.
    Fontana, A.
    Embriaco, A.
    Resch, A.
    Ciocca, M.
    Ferrari, A.
    Kamp, F.
    Mairani, A.
    Sala, P.
    Tessonnier, T.
    Wilkens, J.
    Rotondi, A.
    Parodi, K.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2016, 118 : S8 - S9
  • [25] Automatic detection and classification of treatment deviations in proton therapy from realistically simulated prompt gamma imaging data
    Pietsch, Julian
    Khamfongkhruea, Chirasak
    Berthold, Jonathan
    Janssens, Guillaume
    Stuetzer, Kristin
    Loeck, Steffen
    Richter, Christian
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2023, 50 (01) : 506 - 517
  • [26] Initial Validation of Proton Dose Calculations on SPR Images from DECT in Treatment Planning System
    Mossahebi, Sina
    Sabouri, Pouya
    Chen, Haijian
    Mundis, Michelle
    O'Neil, Matthew
    Maggi, Paul
    Polf, Jerimy C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PARTICLE THERAPY, 2020, 7 (02) : 51 - 61
  • [27] Design and performance evaluation of a coded aperture imaging system for real-time prompt gamma-ray monitoring during proton therapy
    Sun, Shifeng
    Liu, Yang
    Ouyang, Xiaoping
    RADIATION PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY, 2020, 174
  • [28] From prompt gamma distribution to dose: a novel approach combining an evolutionary algorithm and filtering based on Gaussian-powerlaw convolutions
    Schumann, A.
    Priegnitz, M.
    Schoene, S.
    Enghardt, W.
    Rohling, H.
    Fiedler, F.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2016, 61 (19) : 6919 - 6934
  • [29] Experimental Comparison of Knife-Edge and Multi-Parallel Slit Collimators for Prompt Gamma Imaging of Proton Pencil Beams
    Smeets, Julien
    Roellinghoff, Frauke
    Janssens, Guillaume
    Perali, Irene
    Celani, Andrea
    Fiorini, Carlo
    Freud, Nicolas
    Testa, Etienne
    Prieels, Damien
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2016, 6
  • [30] A systematic approach for calibrating a Monte Carlo code to a treatment planning system for obtaining dose, LET, variable proton RBE and out-of-field dose
    Tjelta, Johannes
    Fjaera, Lars Fredrik
    Ytre-Hauge, Kristian Smeland
    Boer, Camilla Grindeland
    Stokkevag, Camilla Hanquist
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2023, 68 (22)