Enhancing Preoperative Assessment of Endometrial Cancer: The Role of Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Evaluating Myometrial Invasion

Background: Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynecological malignancy. Accurate preoperative staging is essential for guiding treatment. The depth of myometrial invasion is a key prognostic factor. This prospective study aimed to evaluate the added benefit of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) compared to T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) for the preoperative assessment of myometrial invasion in EC. Aim and objectives: The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the added benefit of DWI in the preoperative assessment of myometrial invasion in EC, in comparison with T2WI and DCE-MRI. The objectives were to assess the imaging characteristics of endometrial carcinoma on T2WI, DCE, and DW MR, to assess the depth of myometrial invasion and overall stage in EC patients, to compare the diagnostic performance of DCE-MRI with that of DW-MRI combined with T2WI, to describe how MR imaging findings can be combined with tumor histologic features and grading to guide treatment planning, and to evaluate the pitfalls and limitations of DCE and DW MR in the assessment of EC. Materials and methods: Thirty-one patients with histologically confirmed EC underwent preoperative pelvic MRI on a 1.5T scanner. T2WI, DWI (b-values 0, 1000 s/mm(2)), and DCE-MRI were performed. Two radiologists independently assessed myometrial invasion on T2WI, T2WI + DWI, and T2WI + DCE-MRI. Histopathology after hysterectomy was the reference standard. Diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated for each MRI protocol, with separate analyses for superficial (<50%) and deep (>= 50%) myometrial invasions. Results: The accuracy for assessing superficial invasion was 61.3% for T2WI, 87.1% for T2WI + DWI, and 87.1% for T2WI + DCE-MRI. For deep invasion, accuracy was 64.5% for T2WI, 90.3% for T2WI + DWI, and 90.3% for T2WI + DCE-MRI. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for T2WI + DWI and T2WI + DCE-MRI were high and comparable (88.9-91.7%) for both superficial and deep invasions. T2WI had markedly lower sensitivity and specificity. The differences between T2WI and the functional MRI protocols were statistically significant (p < 0.01). Conclusion: DWI and DCE-MRI significantly improve the diagnostic performance of MRI for the preoperative assessment of myometrial invasion depth in EC compared to T2WI alone. DWI + T2WI and DCE-MRI + T2WI demonstrate comparable high accuracy. DWI may be preferable since it is faster and avoids contrast administration.