Clinical value of serum tumor markers in assessing the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer: single-center prospective clinical study

被引:1
作者
Huang, Jing [1 ]
Du, Danyi [2 ]
Chen, Hailong [1 ]
Luo, Deping [1 ]
Wang, Qi [1 ]
Li, Chan [1 ]
Li, Yuanxiang [3 ]
Yu, Ying [1 ]
机构
[1] Ganzhou Canc Hosp, Dept Gynecol & Oncol, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
[2] Southern Med Univ, Shenzhen Hosp, Shenzhen, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Ganzhou Canc Hosp, Dept Clin Lab, Ganzhou, Jiangxi, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2024年 / 14卷
关键词
ovarian cancer; neoadjuvant chemotherapy; human epididymal protein 4; efficacy of chemotherapy; predictive indicators; PRIMARY DEBULKING SURGERY; PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE; SURVIVAL; CEA; CARCINOMA; CA125; TRIAL; RISK;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2024.1399502
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective: This study aimed to assess the clinical importance of various biomarkers, including NLR, CEA, CA199, CA125, CA153, and HE4, through dynamic testing to evaluate the effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for individuals facing advanced ovarian cancer. This provides valuable information for tailoring treatment plans to individual patients, thereby leading to a more personalized and effective management of individuals facing ovarian cancer. Methods: The levels of NLR, CA125, CA199, CEA, CA153, and HE4 were detected before chemotherapy and after 3 courses of chemotherapy. Patients were categorized into ineffective and effective groups according to the effectiveness of NACT. To evaluate the factors influencing NACT's effectiveness in individuals facing advanced ovarian cancer, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, predictive modeling, and multifactorial regression analysis were employed. Results: In the effective group, the patients' age, maximum tumor diameter, and CEA and HE4 levels of the patients were significantly higher compared to those in the ineffective group (P <.05). Additionally, the difference in HE4 levels before and after treatment between the effective and ineffective groups was statistically significant (P<.05). Multifactorial analysis showed that age and maximum tumor diameter were independent risk factors impacting the effectiveness of NACT in individuals facing advanced ovarian cancer (P<.05). The ROC curve for predicting the effectiveness of NACT in individuals facing advanced ovarian cancer showed a sensitivity of 93.3% for NLR and a specificity of 92.3% for CA199. HE4 emerged as the most reliable predictor, demonstrating a specificity of 84.6% and a sensitivity of 75.3%. The area under the curve of the combined CA125 and HE4 assays for predicting the ineffectiveness of NACT in individuals facing advanced ovarian cancer was 0.825, showcasing a specificity of 74.2% and a sensitivity of 84.6%. Conclusion: The predictive capacity for the effectiveness of NACT in individuals facing advanced ovarian cancer is notably high when considering the sensitivity of NLR and the specificity of CA199. Additionally, the combination of CA125 and HE4 assays can obtain a better predictive effect, which can accurately select patients suitable for NACT, determine the appropriate timing of the interval debulking surgery (IDS) surgery, and achieve a satisfactory tumor reduction effect.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Quality of life in women treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer: A prospective longitudinal study
    Chan, YM
    Ng, TY
    Ngan, HYS
    Wong, LC
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2003, 88 (01) : 9 - 16
  • [22] Histopathology predicts clinical outcome in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and debulking surgery
    Muraji, Miho
    Sudo, Tamotsu
    Iwasaki, Shin-ichi
    Ueno, Sayaka
    Wakahashi, Senn
    Yamaguchi, Satoshi
    Fujiwara, Kiyoshi
    Nishimura, Ryuichiro
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2013, 131 (03) : 531 - 534
  • [23] Clinical significance of primary debulking surgery and neoadjuvant chemotherapy-interval debulking surgery in advanced ovarian cancer
    Nishio, Shin
    Ushijima, Kimio
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 50 (04) : 379 - 386
  • [24] The clinical response of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer patients to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in China
    Yao, K.
    Bian, C.
    Li, L.
    Wu, Y.
    Zhao, X.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GYNAECOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 39 (03) : 377 - 380
  • [25] Survival and inferential analysis in patients with locally advanced breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and subsequent sentinel lymph node biopsy: prospective single-center study
    Nino, Johanna Marcela Espejo
    EJNMMI REPORTS, 2024, 8 (01)
  • [26] Treatment of advanced gastric cancer with etoposide, folinic acid, and fluorouracil in the clinical setting - Efficacy of therapy and value of serum tumor markers
    Schulze-Bergkamen, H
    Zuna, I
    Teufel, A
    Stremmel, W
    Rudi, J
    MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 19 (01) : 43 - 53
  • [27] Treatment of advanced gastric cancer with etoposide, folinic acid, and fluorouracil in the clinical setting: Efficacy of therapy and value of serum tumor markers
    Schulze-Bergkamen H.
    Zuna I.
    Teufel A.
    Stremmel W.
    Rudi J.
    Medical Oncology, 2002, 19 (1) : 43 - 53
  • [28] Clinical implications of serum miR-34a in breast cancer and its predictive value for the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy
    Hong, Yanyan
    Chen, Tingting
    He, Qian
    Ma, Qiang
    Chen, Zhendong
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH, 2024, 16 (06): : 2711 - 2718
  • [29] Correlation Between Baseline Serum Tumor Markers and Clinical Characteristic Factors in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
    Deng, Guo-chao
    Yan, Huan
    Guo, Zhi-peng
    Dai, Guanghai
    ONCOTARGETS AND THERAPY, 2020, 13 : 11151 - 11163
  • [30] Clinical and pathological factors predictive of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: A single center experience
    Del Prete, Salvatore
    Caraglia, Michele
    Luce, Amalia
    Montella, Liliana
    Galizia, Gennaro
    Sperlongano, Pasquale
    Cennamo, Gregorio
    Lieto, Eva
    Capasso, Elena
    Fiorentino, Olga
    Aliberti, Maria
    Auricchio, Annamaria
    Iodice, Patrizia
    Addeo, Raffaele
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2019, 18 (04) : 3873 - 3879