Demand-pull and technology-push environmental innovation: a policy mix analysis on EU ETS and EU Cohesion Policy

被引:5
作者
Scotti, Francesco [1 ,2 ]
Flori, Andrea [1 ]
Crescenzi, Riccardo [2 ]
Pammolli, Fabio [1 ]
机构
[1] Dept Management Econ & Ind Engn, Milan, Italy
[2] London Sch Econ, Dept Geog & Environm, Houghton St, London WC2A 2AE, England
关键词
Demand-pull policy; technology-push policy; policy mix; patent applications; CO2; emissions; panel event study; COST PASS-THROUGH; DIRECTED TECHNICAL CHANGE; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; LOW-CARBON INNOVATION; CLIMATE-CHANGE; ENERGY; IMPACT; SIDE; INSTRUMENTS; COMPLEMENT;
D O I
10.1080/14693062.2024.2366894
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Existing literature on the sustainability transition towards a low-carbon economy provides conceptual frameworks for designing combinations of policy interventions but lacks empirical evidence regarding their application. This paper aims to test whether a mix of policy instruments represents a potential valid solution to manage carbon abatement effectively. We refer to the European Union Emissions Trading System (EU ETS) as an example of demand-pull environmental policy, while we include the Structural and Cohesion Funds (SCFs) and the Horizon 2020 funds as examples of technology-push policies. Through the application of a panel event study, we find that the EU ETS generates a positive impact on environmental patent applications in the light manufacturing sector during the period 2013-2020, while EU ETS participation and financial support contribute to environmental innovation and CO2 emission reduction in the energy sector. Hence, those sectors where market dynamics allow avoidance of complete internalization of the carbon price may benefit from financial support to re-direct the technological change towards the sustainability transition. We demonstrate that the analysed policy mix contributed to a reduction of about 2.2% of total emissions produced by energy firms in the EU ETS during Phase III, which is in line with EU climate targets. Overall, our work may support policymakers in understanding the relevant factors that affect the impact of the policy mix on the environmental transition.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 170
页数:18
相关论文
共 92 条
  • [51] Environmental policy and technological change
    Jaffe, AB
    Newell, RG
    Stavins, RN
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2002, 22 (1-2) : 41 - 69
  • [52] Identifying carbon leakage sectors in the EU ETS and implications of results
    Juergens, Ingmar
    Barreiro-Hurle, Jesus
    Vasa, Alexander
    [J]. CLIMATE POLICY, 2013, 13 (01) : 89 - 109
  • [53] Business responses to climate change: Identifying emergent strategies
    Kolk, A
    Pinkse, J
    [J]. CALIFORNIA MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2005, 47 (03) : 6 - +
  • [54] The effects and side-effects of the EU emissions trading scheme
    Laing, Timothy
    Sato, Misato
    Grubb, Michael
    Comberti, Claudia
    [J]. WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-CLIMATE CHANGE, 2014, 5 (04) : 509 - 519
  • [55] Why should support schemes for renewable electricity complement the EU emissions trading scheme?
    Lehmann, Paul
    Gawel, Erik
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 52 : 597 - 607
  • [56] Policies, actors and sustainability transition pathways: A study of the EU's energy policy mix
    Lindberg, Marie Byskov
    Markard, Jochen
    Andersen, Allan Dahl
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2019, 48 (10)
  • [57] Country-based rate of emissions reductions should increase by 80% beyond nationally determined contributions to meet the 2°C target
    Liu, Peiran R.
    Raftery, Adrian E.
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS EARTH & ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 2 (01):
  • [58] The short-term price effects and transmission mechanism of CO2 cost pass-through in China: A partial transmission model
    Ma, Ning
    Li, Huajiao
    Zhang, Jinwei
    Han, Xiaodan
    Feng, Sida
    Arif, Asma
    [J]. RESOURCES POLICY, 2021, 70
  • [59] The 'added value' of European Union cohesion policy
    Mairate, A
    [J]. REGIONAL STUDIES, 2006, 40 (02) : 167 - 177
  • [60] Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects
    Markard, Jochen
    Raven, Rob
    Truffer, Bernhard
    [J]. RESEARCH POLICY, 2012, 41 (06) : 955 - 967