Inconsistent Monthly Runoff Prediction Models Using Mutation Tests and Machine Learning

被引:1
作者
Ren, Miaomiao [1 ,2 ]
Sun, Wei [1 ,3 ]
Chen, Shu [4 ]
Zeng, Decheng [5 ]
Xie, Yutong [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Geog & Planning, Guangzhou 510275, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Yongqiang Middle Sch, Wenzhou 325000, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[3] Southern Marine Sci & Engn Guangdong Lab Zhuhai, Zhuhai 519082, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[4] Qingjiang Foreign Language Sch, Enshi 445000, Hubei, Peoples R China
[5] Guangdong Yuehai Feilaixia Hydropower Ltd Co, Lechangxia Branch, Lechang 512200, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
Mutation test; Inconsistent monthly runoff; Combining model; ANN; SVM; RIVER-BASIN; STREAMFLOW PREDICTION; COMBINATION; FORECASTS; CATCHMENT; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1007/s11269-024-03911-y
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In a changing environment, the increasing inconsistency of runoff series complicates the development of runoff forecasting models. Mutation tests have frequently been employed to assess runoff inconsistency, yet their integration with runoff forecasting is rare. In this study, we proposed a combination of machine learning models based on mutation tests to predict monthly runoff at the Pingshi Station, located in the Lechang Gorge Reservoir of the Pearl River in Guangdong Province, China. Specifically, the mutation points of the monthly runoff were assessed using the Mann-Kendall test and the Moving T-test (MTT). The development of member models, including Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and Support Vector Machines (SVM), utilized both the original runoff series and the sub runoff series identified after the first mutation point. Tele-connected factors and historical monthly runoffs served as candidate input variables. These variables were selected through linear and nonlinear filter methods and further refined by a greedy search based on 10-fold cross-validation. The improvement in overall forecasting performance by combining the ANN, SVM, and the Simple Average Method (SAM) was analyzed. The results showed that, for the validation dataset, the root mean square errors of the combined models with MTT decreased by about 14-19% compared to the member models with MTT, and 10-12% compared to the combined models without mutation tests. The corresponding Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency coefficients increased by approximately 35-45% and 12-14%, respectively. This study highlights the effectiveness of integrating mutation tests, machine learning, and combining models to enhance the forecasting performance of inconsistent monthly runoff.
引用
收藏
页码:5235 / 5254
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Parkinson Disease Prediction Using Machine Learning Algorithm [J].
Mathur, Richa ;
Pathak, Vibhakar ;
Bandil, Devesh .
EMERGING TRENDS IN EXPERT APPLICATIONS AND SECURITY, 2019, 841 :357-363
[32]   Prediction of Cancer Disease using Machine learning Approach [J].
Shaikh, F. J. ;
Rao, D. S. .
MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2022, 50 :40-47
[33]   Water quality prediction using machine learning methods [J].
Haghiabi, Amir Hamzeh ;
Nasrolahi, Ali Heidar ;
Parsaie, Abbas .
WATER QUALITY RESEARCH JOURNAL OF CANADA, 2018, 53 (01) :3-13
[34]   Evaluating Different Machine Learning Models for Runoff and Suspended Sediment Simulation [J].
Ashish Kumar ;
Pravendra Kumar ;
Vijay Kumar Singh .
Water Resources Management, 2019, 33 :1217-1231
[35]   Comparative Analysis of Diabetes Prediction Using Machine Learning [J].
David, S. Alex ;
Varsha, V. ;
Ravali, Y. ;
Saranya, N. Naga Amrutha .
SOFT COMPUTING FOR SECURITY APPLICATIONS, ICSCS 2022, 2023, 1428 :155-163
[36]   Estimation of monthly evaporative loss using relevance vector machine, extreme learning machine and multivariate adaptive regression spline models [J].
Deo, Ravinesh C. ;
Samui, Pijush ;
Kim, Dookie .
STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2016, 30 (06) :1769-1784
[37]   Monthly Agricultural Reservoir Storage Forecasting Using Machine Learning [J].
Kim, Soo-Jin ;
Bae, Seung-Jong ;
Lee, Seung-Jae ;
Jang, Min-Won .
ATMOSPHERE, 2022, 13 (11)
[38]   Prediction of the natural frequencies of various beams using regression machine learning models [J].
Das, Oguzhan .
SIGMA JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING AND NATURAL SCIENCES-SIGMA MUHENDISLIK VE FEN BILIMLERI DERGISI, 2023, 41 (02) :302-321
[39]   Improving Streamflow Prediction Using Multiple Hydrological Models and Machine Learning Methods [J].
Solanki, Hiren ;
Vegad, Urmin ;
Kushwaha, Anuj ;
Mishra, Vimal .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2025, 61 (01)
[40]   Evaluation and prediction of groundwater quality for irrigation using regression and machine learning models [J].
Shaw, Souvick Kumar ;
Sharma, Anurag .
WATER QUALITY RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2025, 60 (01) :260-297