Inconsistent Monthly Runoff Prediction Models Using Mutation Tests and Machine Learning

被引:1
作者
Ren, Miaomiao [1 ,2 ]
Sun, Wei [1 ,3 ]
Chen, Shu [4 ]
Zeng, Decheng [5 ]
Xie, Yutong [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Geog & Planning, Guangzhou 510275, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Yongqiang Middle Sch, Wenzhou 325000, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[3] Southern Marine Sci & Engn Guangdong Lab Zhuhai, Zhuhai 519082, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[4] Qingjiang Foreign Language Sch, Enshi 445000, Hubei, Peoples R China
[5] Guangdong Yuehai Feilaixia Hydropower Ltd Co, Lechangxia Branch, Lechang 512200, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
Mutation test; Inconsistent monthly runoff; Combining model; ANN; SVM; RIVER-BASIN; STREAMFLOW PREDICTION; COMBINATION; FORECASTS; CATCHMENT; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1007/s11269-024-03911-y
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In a changing environment, the increasing inconsistency of runoff series complicates the development of runoff forecasting models. Mutation tests have frequently been employed to assess runoff inconsistency, yet their integration with runoff forecasting is rare. In this study, we proposed a combination of machine learning models based on mutation tests to predict monthly runoff at the Pingshi Station, located in the Lechang Gorge Reservoir of the Pearl River in Guangdong Province, China. Specifically, the mutation points of the monthly runoff were assessed using the Mann-Kendall test and the Moving T-test (MTT). The development of member models, including Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and Support Vector Machines (SVM), utilized both the original runoff series and the sub runoff series identified after the first mutation point. Tele-connected factors and historical monthly runoffs served as candidate input variables. These variables were selected through linear and nonlinear filter methods and further refined by a greedy search based on 10-fold cross-validation. The improvement in overall forecasting performance by combining the ANN, SVM, and the Simple Average Method (SAM) was analyzed. The results showed that, for the validation dataset, the root mean square errors of the combined models with MTT decreased by about 14-19% compared to the member models with MTT, and 10-12% compared to the combined models without mutation tests. The corresponding Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency coefficients increased by approximately 35-45% and 12-14%, respectively. This study highlights the effectiveness of integrating mutation tests, machine learning, and combining models to enhance the forecasting performance of inconsistent monthly runoff.
引用
收藏
页码:5235 / 5254
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Machine learning model combined with CEEMDAN algorithm for monthly precipitation prediction
    Zi-yi Shen
    Wen-chao Ban
    Earth Science Informatics, 2023, 16 : 1821 - 1833
  • [22] Spatial prediction and mapping of landslide susceptibility using machine learning models
    Chen, Yu
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2025, : 8367 - 8385
  • [23] Susceptibility Prediction of Groundwater Hardness Using Ensemble Machine Learning Models
    Mosavi, Amirhosein
    Hosseini, Farzaneh Sajedi
    Choubin, Bahram
    Abdolshahnejad, Mahsa
    Gharechaee, Hamidreza
    Lahijanzadeh, Ahmadreza
    Dineva, Adrienn A.
    WATER, 2020, 12 (10)
  • [24] Frost prediction using machine learning and deep neural network models
    Talsma, Carl J.
    Solander, Kurt C.
    Mudunuru, Maruti K.
    Crawford, Brandon
    Powell, Michelle R.
    FRONTIERS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2023, 5
  • [25] Using machine learning techniques to develop prediction models for detecting unpaid credit card customers
    Yontar, Meltem
    Namli, Ozge Husniye
    Yanik, Seda
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2020, 39 (05) : 6073 - 6087
  • [26] A new algorithm for time series prediction using machine learning models
    Jahnavi, Yeturu
    Elango, Poongothai
    Raja, S. P.
    Parra Fuente, Javier
    Verdu, Elena
    EVOLUTIONARY INTELLIGENCE, 2023, 16 (05) : 1449 - 1460
  • [27] Analysis of breast cancer prediction and visualisation using machine learning models
    Magesh G.
    Swarnalatha P.
    International Journal of Cloud Computing, 2022, 11 (01) : 43 - 60
  • [28] Embedding machine learning techniques into a conceptual model to improve monthly runoff simulation: A nested hybrid rainfall-runoff modeling
    Okkan, Umut
    Ersoy, Zeynep Beril
    Kumanlioglu, Ahmet Ali
    Fistikoglu, Okan
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2021, 598
  • [29] Monthly runoff prediction using modified CEEMD-based weighted integrated model
    Yan, Xinqing
    Chang, Yuan
    Yang, Yang
    Liu, Xuemei
    JOURNAL OF WATER AND CLIMATE CHANGE, 2021, 12 (05) : 1744 - 1760
  • [30] Monthly Agricultural Reservoir Storage Forecasting Using Machine Learning
    Kim, Soo-Jin
    Bae, Seung-Jong
    Lee, Seung-Jae
    Jang, Min-Won
    ATMOSPHERE, 2022, 13 (11)