Inconsistent Monthly Runoff Prediction Models Using Mutation Tests and Machine Learning

被引:1
作者
Ren, Miaomiao [1 ,2 ]
Sun, Wei [1 ,3 ]
Chen, Shu [4 ]
Zeng, Decheng [5 ]
Xie, Yutong [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Geog & Planning, Guangzhou 510275, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Yongqiang Middle Sch, Wenzhou 325000, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[3] Southern Marine Sci & Engn Guangdong Lab Zhuhai, Zhuhai 519082, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[4] Qingjiang Foreign Language Sch, Enshi 445000, Hubei, Peoples R China
[5] Guangdong Yuehai Feilaixia Hydropower Ltd Co, Lechangxia Branch, Lechang 512200, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
Mutation test; Inconsistent monthly runoff; Combining model; ANN; SVM; RIVER-BASIN; STREAMFLOW PREDICTION; COMBINATION; FORECASTS; CATCHMENT; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1007/s11269-024-03911-y
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In a changing environment, the increasing inconsistency of runoff series complicates the development of runoff forecasting models. Mutation tests have frequently been employed to assess runoff inconsistency, yet their integration with runoff forecasting is rare. In this study, we proposed a combination of machine learning models based on mutation tests to predict monthly runoff at the Pingshi Station, located in the Lechang Gorge Reservoir of the Pearl River in Guangdong Province, China. Specifically, the mutation points of the monthly runoff were assessed using the Mann-Kendall test and the Moving T-test (MTT). The development of member models, including Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and Support Vector Machines (SVM), utilized both the original runoff series and the sub runoff series identified after the first mutation point. Tele-connected factors and historical monthly runoffs served as candidate input variables. These variables were selected through linear and nonlinear filter methods and further refined by a greedy search based on 10-fold cross-validation. The improvement in overall forecasting performance by combining the ANN, SVM, and the Simple Average Method (SAM) was analyzed. The results showed that, for the validation dataset, the root mean square errors of the combined models with MTT decreased by about 14-19% compared to the member models with MTT, and 10-12% compared to the combined models without mutation tests. The corresponding Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency coefficients increased by approximately 35-45% and 12-14%, respectively. This study highlights the effectiveness of integrating mutation tests, machine learning, and combining models to enhance the forecasting performance of inconsistent monthly runoff.
引用
收藏
页码:5235 / 5254
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Streamflow prediction using machine learning models in selected rivers of Southern India
    Sharma, Rajat Kr
    Kumar, Sudhanshu
    Padmalal, D.
    Roy, Arka
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RIVER BASIN MANAGEMENT, 2024, 22 (04) : 529 - 555
  • [12] Evaluating the effects of vegetation and land management on runoff control using field plots and machine learning models
    Gholami, Vahid
    Sahour, Hossein
    Khaleghi, Mohammad Reza
    Yousefi, Atena
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2023, 30 (11) : 31202 - 31217
  • [13] Monthly and seasonal hydrological drought forecasting using multiple extreme learning machine models
    Wang, Guo Chun
    Zhang, Qian
    Band, Shahab S.
    Dehghani, Majid
    Chau, Kwok Wing
    Tho, Quan Thanh
    Zhu, Senlin
    Samadianfard, Saeed
    Mosavi, Amir
    ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS OF COMPUTATIONAL FLUID MECHANICS, 2022, 16 (01) : 1364 - 1381
  • [14] Advanced Machine Learning Techniques to Improve Hydrological Prediction: A Comparative Analysis of Streamflow Prediction Models
    Kumar, Vijendra
    Kedam, Naresh
    Sharma, Kul Vaibhav
    Mehta, Darshan J.
    Caloiero, Tommaso
    WATER, 2023, 15 (14)
  • [15] Two-step hybrid model for monthly runoff prediction utilizing integrated machine learning algorithms and dual signal decompositions
    Wu, Shujun
    Dong, Zengchuan
    Conde, Gregory
    Wang, Wenzhuo
    Zhu, Shengnan
    Shao, Yiqing
    Meng, Jinyu
    ECOLOGICAL INFORMATICS, 2024, 84
  • [16] Advancing monthly streamflow prediction accuracy of CART models using ensemble learning paradigms
    Erdal, Halil Ibrahim
    Karakurt, Onur
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2013, 477 : 119 - 128
  • [17] Monthly streamflow prediction and performance comparison of machine learning and deep learning methods
    Ayana, Omer
    Kanbak, Deniz Furkan
    Keles, Muemine Kaya
    Turhan, Evren
    ACTA GEOPHYSICA, 2023, 71 (06) : 2905 - 2922
  • [18] Monthly streamflow prediction and performance comparison of machine learning and deep learning methods
    Ömer Ayana
    Deniz Furkan Kanbak
    Mümine Kaya Keleş
    Evren Turhan
    Acta Geophysica, 2023, 71 : 2905 - 2922
  • [19] Machine learning model combined with CEEMDAN algorithm for monthly precipitation prediction
    Shen, Zi-yi
    Ban, Wen-chao
    EARTH SCIENCE INFORMATICS, 2023, 16 (2) : 1821 - 1833
  • [20] Modelling and Prediction of Monthly Global Irradiation Using Different Prediction Models
    Martinez-Castillo, Cecilia
    Astray, Gonzalo
    Mejuto, Juan Carlos
    ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (08)