Inconsistent Monthly Runoff Prediction Models Using Mutation Tests and Machine Learning

被引:1
作者
Ren, Miaomiao [1 ,2 ]
Sun, Wei [1 ,3 ]
Chen, Shu [4 ]
Zeng, Decheng [5 ]
Xie, Yutong [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Geog & Planning, Guangzhou 510275, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Yongqiang Middle Sch, Wenzhou 325000, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[3] Southern Marine Sci & Engn Guangdong Lab Zhuhai, Zhuhai 519082, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[4] Qingjiang Foreign Language Sch, Enshi 445000, Hubei, Peoples R China
[5] Guangdong Yuehai Feilaixia Hydropower Ltd Co, Lechangxia Branch, Lechang 512200, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
Mutation test; Inconsistent monthly runoff; Combining model; ANN; SVM; RIVER-BASIN; STREAMFLOW PREDICTION; COMBINATION; FORECASTS; CATCHMENT; IMPACTS;
D O I
10.1007/s11269-024-03911-y
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In a changing environment, the increasing inconsistency of runoff series complicates the development of runoff forecasting models. Mutation tests have frequently been employed to assess runoff inconsistency, yet their integration with runoff forecasting is rare. In this study, we proposed a combination of machine learning models based on mutation tests to predict monthly runoff at the Pingshi Station, located in the Lechang Gorge Reservoir of the Pearl River in Guangdong Province, China. Specifically, the mutation points of the monthly runoff were assessed using the Mann-Kendall test and the Moving T-test (MTT). The development of member models, including Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and Support Vector Machines (SVM), utilized both the original runoff series and the sub runoff series identified after the first mutation point. Tele-connected factors and historical monthly runoffs served as candidate input variables. These variables were selected through linear and nonlinear filter methods and further refined by a greedy search based on 10-fold cross-validation. The improvement in overall forecasting performance by combining the ANN, SVM, and the Simple Average Method (SAM) was analyzed. The results showed that, for the validation dataset, the root mean square errors of the combined models with MTT decreased by about 14-19% compared to the member models with MTT, and 10-12% compared to the combined models without mutation tests. The corresponding Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency coefficients increased by approximately 35-45% and 12-14%, respectively. This study highlights the effectiveness of integrating mutation tests, machine learning, and combining models to enhance the forecasting performance of inconsistent monthly runoff.
引用
收藏
页码:5235 / 5254
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Climate-informed monthly runoff prediction model using machine learning and feature importance analysis
    Yan, Lei
    Lei, Qingwen
    Jiang, Cong
    Yan, Pengtao
    Ren, Zheng
    Liu, Bin
    Liu, Zhangjun
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2022, 10
  • [2] Application of novel binary optimized machine learning models for monthly streamflow prediction
    Adnan, Rana Muhammad
    Dai, Hong-Liang
    Mostafa, Reham R.
    Islam, Abu Reza Md. Towfiqul
    Kisi, Ozgur
    Elbeltagi, Ahmed
    Zounemat-Kermani, Mohammad
    APPLIED WATER SCIENCE, 2023, 13 (05)
  • [3] Predicting Monthly Runoff of the Upper Yangtze River Based on Multiple Machine Learning Models
    Li, Xiao
    Zhang, Liping
    Zeng, Sidong
    Tang, Zhenyu
    Liu, Lina
    Zhang, Qin
    Tang, Zhengyang
    Hua, Xiaojun
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (18)
  • [4] Application of novel binary optimized machine learning models for monthly streamflow prediction
    Rana Muhammad Adnan
    Hong-Liang Dai
    Reham R. Mostafa
    Abu Reza Md. Towfiqul Islam
    Ozgur Kisi
    Ahmed Elbeltagi
    Mohammad Zounemat-Kermani
    Applied Water Science, 2023, 13
  • [5] Monthly stream flow prediction: the power of ensemble machine learning-based decision support models
    Erdal, Hamit
    Namli, Ersin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2023, 16 (01) : 17 - 36
  • [6] Enhancing Monthly Streamflow Prediction Using Meteorological Factors and Machine Learning Models in the Upper Colorado River Basin
    Thota, Saichand
    Nassar, Ayman
    Boubrahimi, Soukaina Filali
    Hamdi, Shah Muhammad
    Hosseinzadeh, Pouya
    HYDROLOGY, 2024, 11 (05)
  • [7] An Integrated Statistical-Machine Learning Approach for Runoff Prediction
    Singh, Abhinav Kumar
    Kumar, Pankaj
    Ali, Rawshan
    Al-Ansari, Nadhir
    Vishwakarma, Dinesh Kumar
    Kushwaha, Kuldeep Singh
    Panda, Kanhu Charan
    Sagar, Atish
    Mirzania, Ehsan
    Elbeltagi, Ahmed
    Kuriqi, Alban
    Heddam, Salim
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (13)
  • [8] Comparison and integration of hydrological models and machine learning models in global monthly streamflow simulation
    Zhang, Jiawen
    Kong, Dongdong
    Li, Jianfeng
    Qiu, Jianxiu
    Zhang, Yongqiang
    Gu, Xihui
    Guo, Meiyu
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2025, 650
  • [9] Enhancing rainfall-runoff model accuracy with machine learning models by using soil water index to reflect runoff characteristics
    Iamampai, Sarunphas
    Talaluxmana, Yutthana
    Kanasut, Jirawat
    Rangsiwanichpong, Prem
    WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2024, 89 (02) : 368 - 381
  • [10] Machine Learning and the GR2M Model for Monthly Runoff Forecasting
    Kaewthong, Natapon
    Kanplumjit, Torlap
    Kwanthong, Naras
    Sureeya, Kritsana
    Buathongkhue, Chayanat
    CIVIL ENGINEERING JOURNAL-TEHRAN, 2025, 11 (01): : 393 - 405