Assessing Probabilistic Reasoning in Verbal-Numerical and Graphical-Pictorial Formats: An Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of an Instrument

被引:5
作者
Agus, Mirian [1 ]
Pietronilla Penna, Maria [1 ]
Pero-Cebollero, Maribel [2 ]
Guardia-Olmos, Joan [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cagliari, I-09124 Cagliari, Italy
[2] Univ Barcelona, E-08007 Barcelona, Spain
关键词
probabilistic reasoning; format of problem presentation; verbal-numerical format; graphical-pictorial format; educational assessment; validity; ITEM RESPONSE THEORY; CLASSICAL TEST THEORY; CONDITIONAL-PROBABILITY; TIME-PRESSURE; FIT INDEXES; FREQUENCY; REPRESENTATIONS; PERFORMANCE; STATISTICS; JUDGMENT;
D O I
10.12973/eurasia.2016.1265a
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Research on the graphical facilitation of probabilistic reasoning has been characterised by the effort expended to identify valid assessment tools. The authors developed an assessment instrument to compare reasoning performances when problems were presented in verbal-numerical and graphical-pictorial formats. A sample of undergraduate psychology students (n=676) who had not developed statistical skills, solved problems requiring probabilistic reasoning. They attended universities in Spain (n=127; f=71.7%) and Italy (n=549; f=72.9%). In Italy 173 undergraduates solved these problems under time pressure. The remaining students solved the problems without time limits. Classical Test Theory (CTT) and Item Response Theory (IRT) were applied to assess the effect of two formats and to evaluate criterion and discriminant validity. The instrument showed acceptable psychometric properties, providing preliminary evidence of validity.
引用
收藏
页码:2013 / 2038
页数:26
相关论文
共 118 条
  • [91] The impact of faking on Cronbach's alpha for dichotomous and ordered rating scores
    Pastore, Massimiliano
    Lombardi, Luigi
    [J]. QUALITY & QUANTITY, 2014, 48 (03) : 1191 - 1211
  • [92] The use of imagery in statistical reasoning by university undergraduate students: a preliminary study
    Penna, Maria Pietronilla
    Agus, Mirian
    Pero-Cebollero, Maribel
    Guardia-Olmos, Joan
    Pessa, Eliano
    [J]. QUALITY & QUANTITY, 2014, 48 (01) : 173 - 187
  • [93] Measuring the ICF components of impairment, activity limitation and participation restriction: an item analysis using classical test theory and item response theory
    Pollard, Beth
    Dixon, Diane
    Dieppe, Paul
    Johnston, Marie
    [J]. HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2009, 7
  • [94] Inferences under time pressure: How opportunity costs affect strategy selection
    Rieskamp, Joerg
    Hoffrage, Ulrich
    [J]. ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2008, 127 (02) : 258 - 276
  • [95] Rumsey D. J., 2002, J STAT ED, V10, P1, DOI [10.1080/10691898.2002.11910678, DOI 10.1080/10691898.2002.11910678]
  • [96] Salehi Basira, 2010, Learn Mem, V17, P522, DOI 10.1101/lm.1914110
  • [97] Schermelleh-Engel K., 2003, Methods of Psychological Research Online, V8, P23
  • [98] Schinka J. A., 2003, HDB PSYCHOL, V2, P738
  • [99] Schonlau M., 2012, Statistics, Politics, and Policy, V3, DOI [10.1515/2151-7509.1054, DOI 10.1515/2151-7509.1054]
  • [100] Heuristic and algorithmic processing in English, mathematics, and science education
    Sharps, Matthew J.
    Hess, Adam B.
    Price-Sharps, Jana L.
    Teh, Jane
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 142 (01) : 71 - 88