Shared decision-making in advanced physiotherapy and first contact physiotherapy management of adults with musculoskeletal disorders in the United Kingdom: An online cross-sectional survey

被引:2
作者
Thompson, Joanne H. [1 ,2 ]
Thompson, Jonathan [1 ,2 ]
Bailey, Stephen [1 ]
机构
[1] York St John Univ, York, England
[2] Scarborough Teaching Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, York, England
关键词
clinical decision-making; communication; musculoskeletal system; physiotherapy; PHYSICAL-THERAPY; KNOWLEDGE; ATTITUDES; PAIN;
D O I
10.1111/jep.14043
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
RationaleAdvanced practice physiotherapy roles (Advanced Physiotherapy Practitioners [APPs] and First Contact Physiotherapists [FCPs]) are pivotal in supporting patients to manage their musculoskeletal (MSK) conditions. Having a greater understanding of how decisions are made by these practitioners will inform competency frameworks and improve the provision of patient-centred care.AimTo evaluate the current knowledge, views and use of shared decision-making in MSK advanced physiotherapy practice in the United Kingdom.MethodsA cross-sectional survey using an online questionnaire was used to collect demographic information, knowledge, views and self-reported use of shared decision-making (SDM) of APPs and FCPs who work with adults with MSK disorders in the United Kingdom.ResultsResponses from 49 participants (25 APPs and 24 FCPs) were included in the study. In total, 80% of participants had received SDM training and overall high levels of knowledge were shown. Only 12% of participants used a communication model to facilitate SDM. In total, 80% of participants reported making decisions together with the patient either always or most of the time. FCPs favoured a more patient-led approach to decision-making compared to APPs who favoured collaborative decision-making. The most commonly reported barriers to SDM included lack of time, lack of patient education resources, lack of access to patient decision aids and treatment pathway restrictions.ConclusionsThe responses in this study showed that overall APPs and FCPs have good knowledge of SDM and report routine use of collaborative and patient-led decision-making approaches.
引用
收藏
页码:1297 / 1308
页数:12
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   Autonomy and paternalism in shared decision-making in a Saudi Arabian tertiary hospital: A cross-sectional study [J].
Alabdullah, Yousef Y. ;
Alzaid, Esra ;
Alsaad, Safa ;
Alamri, Turki ;
Alolayan, Saleh W. ;
Bah, Suliman ;
Aljoudi, Abdullah S. .
DEVELOPING WORLD BIOETHICS, 2023, 23 (03) :260-268
[2]  
Alston C, 2014, NAM Perspect, V4, DOI DOI 10.31478/201409F
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2020, LANCET, V396, P1129, DOI [10.1016/s0140-6736(20)32131-0, 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32131-0]
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2021, Shared decision making
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2017, Multiprofessional framework for advanced clinical practice in England
[6]   Knowledge of, and attitudes to, shared decision-making in orthodontics in the UK [J].
Barber, Sophy K. ;
Ryan, Fiona ;
Cunningham, Susan J. .
JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2020, 47 (04) :294-302
[7]   The healthcare buffet: preferences in the clinical decision-making process for patients with musculoskeletal pain [J].
Bialosky, Joel E. ;
Cleland, Josh A. ;
Mintken, Paul ;
Beneciuk, Jason M. ;
Bishop, Mark D. .
JOURNAL OF MANUAL & MANIPULATIVE THERAPY, 2022, 30 (02) :68-77
[8]   Key components of shared decision making models: a systematic review [J].
Bomhof-Roordink, Hanna ;
Gartner, Fania R. ;
Stiggelbout, Anne M. ;
Pieterse, Arwen H. .
BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (12)
[9]   Do Decision Aids Benefit Patients with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain? A Systematic Review [J].
Bowen, Emily ;
Nayfe, Rabih ;
Milburn, Nathaniel ;
Mayo, Helen ;
Reid, M. C. ;
Fraenkel, Liana ;
Weiner, Debra ;
Halm, Ethan A. ;
Makris, Una E. .
PAIN MEDICINE, 2020, 21 (05) :951-969
[10]   Shared decision-making: summary of NICE guidance [J].
Carmona, Chris ;
Crutwell, Joseph ;
Burnham, Marie ;
Polak, Louisa .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 373