Machine learning in the prediction of immunotherapy response and prognosis of melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
作者
Li, Juan [1 ]
Dan, Kena [2 ]
Ai, Jun [3 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Dangdai Plast Surg Hosp, Dept Dermatol, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[2] Chongqing Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 3, Dept Dermatol, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[3] Chongqing Huamei Plast Surg Hosp, Dept Dermatol, Chongqing, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY | 2024年 / 15卷
关键词
machine learning; prediction; melanoma; immune checkpoint inhibitor; meta-analysis; IMMUNE CHECKPOINT INHIBITORS; SURVIVAL; BIOMARKERS; THERAPY; SCORE; 1ST;
D O I
10.3389/fimmu.2024.1281940
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background The emergence of immunotherapy has changed the treatment modality for melanoma and prolonged the survival of many patients. However, a handful of patients remain unresponsive to immunotherapy and effective tools for early identification of this patient population are still lacking. Researchers have developed machine learning algorithms for predicting immunotherapy response in melanoma, but their predictive accuracy has been inconsistent. Therefore, the present systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to comprehensively evaluate the predictive accuracy of machine learning in melanoma response to immunotherapy. Methods Relevant studies were searched in PubMed, Web of Sciences, Cochrane Library, and Embase from their inception to July 30, 2022. The risk of bias and applicability of the included studies were assessed using the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST). Meta-analysis was performed on R4.2.0. Results A total of 36 studies consisting of 30 cohort studies and 6 case-control studies were included. These studies were mainly published between 2019 and 2022 and encompassed 75 models. The outcome measures of this study were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment response. The pooled c-index was 0.728 (95%CI: 0.629-0.828) for PFS in the training set, 0.760 (95%CI: 0.728-0.792) and 0.819 (95%CI: 0.757-0.880) for treatment response in the training and validation sets, respectively, and 0.746 (95%CI: 0.721-0.771) and 0.700 (95%CI: 0.677-0.724) for OS in the training and validation sets, respectively. Conclusion Machine learning has considerable predictive accuracy in melanoma immunotherapy response and prognosis, especially in the former. However, due to the lack of external validation and the scarcity of certain types of models, further studies are warranted.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Graft Rejection Prediction Following Kidney Transplantation Using Machine Learning Techniques: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Nursetyo, Aldilas Achmad
    Syed-Abdul, Shabbir
    Uddin, Mohy
    Li, Yu-Chuan
    MEDINFO 2019: HEALTH AND WELLBEING E-NETWORKS FOR ALL, 2019, 264 : 10 - 14
  • [42] Performance of machine learning algorithms for surgical site infection case detection and prediction: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wu, Guosong
    Khair, Shahreen
    Yang, Fengjuan
    Cheligeer, Cheligeer
    Southern, Danielle
    Zhang, Zilong
    Feng, Yuanchao
    Xu, Yuan
    Quan, Hude
    Williamson, Tyler
    Eastwood, Cathy A.
    ANNALS OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2022, 84
  • [43] Machine learning for the prediction of diabetes-related amputation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy
    Zhigang Chen
    Xinliang Liu
    Simeng Li
    Zhenheng Wu
    Haifen Tan
    Fuqian Yu
    Dongmei Wang
    Yawen Bo
    Clinical and Experimental Medicine, 25 (1)
  • [44] Text-Based Depression Prediction on Social Media Using Machine Learning: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Phiri, Doreen
    Makowa, Frank
    Amelia, Vivi Leona
    Phiri, Yohane Vincent Abero
    Dlamini, Lindelwa Portia
    Chung, Min-Huey
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2025, 27
  • [45] Artificial intelligence and machine learning applications in urinary tract infections identification and prediction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shen, Li
    An, Jialu
    Wang, Nanding
    Wu, Jin
    Yao, Jia
    Gao, Yumei
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 42 (01)
  • [46] Circulating microRNAs as diagnostic biomarkers for melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wu, Nan
    Sun, Hongyan
    Sun, Qian
    Zhang, Fangqing
    Ma, Lingli
    Hu, Yue
    Cong, Xianling
    BMC CANCER, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [47] Circulating microRNAs as diagnostic biomarkers for melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Nan Wu
    Hongyan Sun
    Qian Sun
    Fangqing Zhang
    Lingli Ma
    Yue Hu
    Xianling Cong
    BMC Cancer, 23
  • [48] Impact of metformin on melanoma: a meta-analysis and systematic review
    Feng, Hua
    Shang, Shuxian
    Chen, Kun
    Sun, Xuan
    Yue, Xueping
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2024, 14
  • [49] Diagnostic accuracy of machine learning classifiers for cataracts: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Cheung, Ronald
    So, Samantha
    Malvankar-Mehta, Monali S.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 17 (06) : 427 - 437
  • [50] Machine learning value in the diagnosis of vertebral fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Yue
    Liang, Zhuang
    Li, Yingchun
    Cao, Yang
    Zhang, Hui
    Dong, Bo
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2024, 181