Machine learning in the prediction of immunotherapy response and prognosis of melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
作者
Li, Juan [1 ]
Dan, Kena [2 ]
Ai, Jun [3 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Dangdai Plast Surg Hosp, Dept Dermatol, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[2] Chongqing Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 3, Dept Dermatol, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[3] Chongqing Huamei Plast Surg Hosp, Dept Dermatol, Chongqing, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY | 2024年 / 15卷
关键词
machine learning; prediction; melanoma; immune checkpoint inhibitor; meta-analysis; IMMUNE CHECKPOINT INHIBITORS; SURVIVAL; BIOMARKERS; THERAPY; SCORE; 1ST;
D O I
10.3389/fimmu.2024.1281940
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background The emergence of immunotherapy has changed the treatment modality for melanoma and prolonged the survival of many patients. However, a handful of patients remain unresponsive to immunotherapy and effective tools for early identification of this patient population are still lacking. Researchers have developed machine learning algorithms for predicting immunotherapy response in melanoma, but their predictive accuracy has been inconsistent. Therefore, the present systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to comprehensively evaluate the predictive accuracy of machine learning in melanoma response to immunotherapy. Methods Relevant studies were searched in PubMed, Web of Sciences, Cochrane Library, and Embase from their inception to July 30, 2022. The risk of bias and applicability of the included studies were assessed using the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST). Meta-analysis was performed on R4.2.0. Results A total of 36 studies consisting of 30 cohort studies and 6 case-control studies were included. These studies were mainly published between 2019 and 2022 and encompassed 75 models. The outcome measures of this study were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment response. The pooled c-index was 0.728 (95%CI: 0.629-0.828) for PFS in the training set, 0.760 (95%CI: 0.728-0.792) and 0.819 (95%CI: 0.757-0.880) for treatment response in the training and validation sets, respectively, and 0.746 (95%CI: 0.721-0.771) and 0.700 (95%CI: 0.677-0.724) for OS in the training and validation sets, respectively. Conclusion Machine learning has considerable predictive accuracy in melanoma immunotherapy response and prognosis, especially in the former. However, due to the lack of external validation and the scarcity of certain types of models, further studies are warranted.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Prediction performance of the machine learning model in predicting mortality risk in patients with traumatic brain injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jue Wang
    Ming Jing Yin
    Han Chun Wen
    BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 23
  • [32] Machine learning radiomics for H3K27M mutation prediction in gliomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hajikarimloo, Bardia
    Tos, Salem M.
    Kooshki, Alireza
    Alvani, Mohammadamin Sabbagh
    Eftekhar, Mohammad Shahir
    Hasanzade, Arman
    Tavanaei, Roozbeh
    Akhlaghpasand, Mohammadhosein
    Hashemi, Rana
    Ghaffarzadeh-Esfahani, Mohammadreza
    Mohammadzadeh, Ibrahim
    Habibi, Mohammad Amin
    NEURORADIOLOGY, 2025,
  • [33] Imaging Biomarkers of Glioblastoma Treatment Response: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Recent Machine Learning Studies
    Booth, Thomas C.
    Grzeda, Mariusz
    Chelliah, Alysha
    Roman, Andrei
    Al Busaidi, Ayisha
    Dragos, Carmen
    Shuaib, Haris
    Luis, Aysha
    Mirchandani, Ayesha
    Alparslan, Burcu
    Mansoor, Nina
    Lavrador, Jose
    Vergani, Francesco
    Ashkan, Keyoumars
    Modat, Marc
    Ourselin, Sebastien
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [34] Combination of radiotherapy and immunotherapy for brain metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Petrelli, Fausto
    De Stefani, Agostina
    Trevisan, Francesca
    Parati, Chiara
    Inno, Alessandro
    Merelli, Barbara
    Ghidini, Michele
    Bruschieri, Lorenza
    Vitali, Elisabetta
    Cabiddu, Mary
    Borgonovo, Karen
    Ghilardi, Mara
    Barni, Sandro
    Ghidini, Antonio
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2019, 144
  • [35] Prediction performance of the machine learning model in predicting mortality risk in patients with traumatic brain injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Jue
    Yin, Ming Jing
    Wen, Han Chun
    BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [36] The prognostic value of circulating tumor DNA in patients with melanoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Feng, S. N.
    Cen, X. T.
    Tan, R.
    Wei, S. S.
    Sun, L. D.
    TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 14 (06):
  • [37] The benefit of immunotherapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Guven, Deniz Can
    Erul, Enes
    Sahin, Taha Koray
    Dizdar, Omer
    Yalcin, Suayib
    Sahin, Ibrahim Halil
    FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2022, 18 (37) : 4119 - 4136
  • [38] Meningioma MRI radiomics and machine learning: systematic review, quality score assessment, and meta-analysis
    Ugga, Lorenzo
    Perillo, Teresa
    Cuocolo, Renato
    Stanzione, Arnaldo
    Romeo, Valeria
    Green, Roberta
    Cantoni, Valeria
    Brunetti, Arturo
    NEURORADIOLOGY, 2021, 63 (08) : 1293 - 1304
  • [39] Machine learning with magnetic resonance imaging for prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liang, Xueheng
    Yu, Xingyan
    Gao, Tianhu
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2022, 150
  • [40] Circulating microRNAs as diagnostic biomarkers for melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wu, Nan
    Sun, Hongyan
    Sun, Qian
    Zhang, Fangqing
    Ma, Lingli
    Hu, Yue
    Cong, Xianling
    BMC CANCER, 2023, 23 (01)