Machine learning in the prediction of immunotherapy response and prognosis of melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Juan [1 ]
Dan, Kena [2 ]
Ai, Jun [3 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Dangdai Plast Surg Hosp, Dept Dermatol, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[2] Chongqing Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 3, Dept Dermatol, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[3] Chongqing Huamei Plast Surg Hosp, Dept Dermatol, Chongqing, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY | 2024年 / 15卷
关键词
machine learning; prediction; melanoma; immune checkpoint inhibitor; meta-analysis; IMMUNE CHECKPOINT INHIBITORS; SURVIVAL; BIOMARKERS; THERAPY; SCORE; 1ST;
D O I
10.3389/fimmu.2024.1281940
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background The emergence of immunotherapy has changed the treatment modality for melanoma and prolonged the survival of many patients. However, a handful of patients remain unresponsive to immunotherapy and effective tools for early identification of this patient population are still lacking. Researchers have developed machine learning algorithms for predicting immunotherapy response in melanoma, but their predictive accuracy has been inconsistent. Therefore, the present systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to comprehensively evaluate the predictive accuracy of machine learning in melanoma response to immunotherapy. Methods Relevant studies were searched in PubMed, Web of Sciences, Cochrane Library, and Embase from their inception to July 30, 2022. The risk of bias and applicability of the included studies were assessed using the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST). Meta-analysis was performed on R4.2.0. Results A total of 36 studies consisting of 30 cohort studies and 6 case-control studies were included. These studies were mainly published between 2019 and 2022 and encompassed 75 models. The outcome measures of this study were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment response. The pooled c-index was 0.728 (95%CI: 0.629-0.828) for PFS in the training set, 0.760 (95%CI: 0.728-0.792) and 0.819 (95%CI: 0.757-0.880) for treatment response in the training and validation sets, respectively, and 0.746 (95%CI: 0.721-0.771) and 0.700 (95%CI: 0.677-0.724) for OS in the training and validation sets, respectively. Conclusion Machine learning has considerable predictive accuracy in melanoma immunotherapy response and prognosis, especially in the former. However, due to the lack of external validation and the scarcity of certain types of models, further studies are warranted.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Machine learning for prediction of asthma exacerbations among asthmatic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shiqiu Xiong
    Wei Chen
    Xinyu Jia
    Yang Jia
    Chuanhe Liu
    BMC Pulmonary Medicine, 23
  • [22] Machine learning prediction of motor function in chronic stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Qinglin
    Chi, Lei
    Zhao, Weiying
    Wu, Lei
    Jiao, Chuanxu
    Zheng, Xue
    Zhang, Kaiyue
    Li, Xiaoning
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [23] Machine learning for clinical outcome prediction in cerebrovascular and endovascular neurosurgery: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hoffman, Haydn
    Sims, Jason J.
    Inoa-Acosta, Violiza
    Hoit, Daniel
    Arthur, Adam S.
    Draytsel, Dan Y.
    Kim, YeonSoo
    Goyal, Nitin
    JOURNAL OF NEUROINTERVENTIONAL SURGERY, 2024,
  • [24] Prediction of hypertension using traditional regression and machine learning models: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chowdhury, Mohammad Ziaul Islam
    Naeem, Iffat
    Quan, Hude
    Leung, Alexander A.
    Sikdar, Khokan C.
    O'Beirne, Maeve
    Turin, Tanvir C.
    PLOS ONE, 2022, 17 (04):
  • [25] Machine learning for prediction of asthma exacerbations among asthmatic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xiong, Shiqiu
    Chen, Wei
    Jia, Xinyu
    Jia, Yang
    Liu, Chuanhe
    BMC PULMONARY MEDICINE, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [26] Machine learning-based models for prediction of survival in medulloblastoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hajikarimloo, Bardia
    Habibi, Mohammad Amin
    Alvani, Mohammadamin Sabbagh
    Meinagh, Sima Osouli
    Kooshki, Alireza
    Afkhami-Ardakani, Omid
    Rasouli, Fatemeh
    Tos, Salem M.
    Tavanaei, Roozbeh
    Akhlaghpasand, Mohammadhosein
    Hashemi, Rana
    Hasanzade, Arman
    NEUROLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2025, 46 (02) : 689 - 696
  • [27] Comparing logistic regression and machine learning for obesity risk prediction: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Boakye, Nancy Fosua
    O'Toole, Ciaran Courtney
    Jalali, Amirhossein
    Hannigan, Ailish
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2025, 199
  • [28] Prevalence of dermatological toxicities in patients with melanoma undergoing immunotherapy: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mineiro dos Santos Garrett, Nathali Felicia
    Carvalho da Costa, Ana Cristina
    Barros Ferreira, Elaine
    Damiani, Giovanni
    Diniz dos Reis, Paula Elaine
    Inocencio Vasques, Christiane
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (08):
  • [29] The impact of targeted therapies and immunotherapy in melanoma brain metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mandala, M.
    Legramandi, L.
    Salvati, L.
    Rulli, E.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2019, 30
  • [30] The impact of targeted therapies and immunotherapy in melanoma brain metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Rulli, Eliana
    Legramandi, Lorenzo
    Salvati, Lorenzo
    Mandala, Mario
    CANCER, 2019, 125 (21) : 3776 - 3789