Machine learning in the prediction of immunotherapy response and prognosis of melanoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Li, Juan [1 ]
Dan, Kena [2 ]
Ai, Jun [3 ]
机构
[1] Chongqing Dangdai Plast Surg Hosp, Dept Dermatol, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[2] Chongqing Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 3, Dept Dermatol, Chongqing, Peoples R China
[3] Chongqing Huamei Plast Surg Hosp, Dept Dermatol, Chongqing, Peoples R China
来源
FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY | 2024年 / 15卷
关键词
machine learning; prediction; melanoma; immune checkpoint inhibitor; meta-analysis; IMMUNE CHECKPOINT INHIBITORS; SURVIVAL; BIOMARKERS; THERAPY; SCORE; 1ST;
D O I
10.3389/fimmu.2024.1281940
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background The emergence of immunotherapy has changed the treatment modality for melanoma and prolonged the survival of many patients. However, a handful of patients remain unresponsive to immunotherapy and effective tools for early identification of this patient population are still lacking. Researchers have developed machine learning algorithms for predicting immunotherapy response in melanoma, but their predictive accuracy has been inconsistent. Therefore, the present systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to comprehensively evaluate the predictive accuracy of machine learning in melanoma response to immunotherapy. Methods Relevant studies were searched in PubMed, Web of Sciences, Cochrane Library, and Embase from their inception to July 30, 2022. The risk of bias and applicability of the included studies were assessed using the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST). Meta-analysis was performed on R4.2.0. Results A total of 36 studies consisting of 30 cohort studies and 6 case-control studies were included. These studies were mainly published between 2019 and 2022 and encompassed 75 models. The outcome measures of this study were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment response. The pooled c-index was 0.728 (95%CI: 0.629-0.828) for PFS in the training set, 0.760 (95%CI: 0.728-0.792) and 0.819 (95%CI: 0.757-0.880) for treatment response in the training and validation sets, respectively, and 0.746 (95%CI: 0.721-0.771) and 0.700 (95%CI: 0.677-0.724) for OS in the training and validation sets, respectively. Conclusion Machine learning has considerable predictive accuracy in melanoma immunotherapy response and prognosis, especially in the former. However, due to the lack of external validation and the scarcity of certain types of models, further studies are warranted.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Prediction of prognosis in COVID-19 patients using machine learning: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chen, Ruiyao
    Chen, Jiayuan
    Yang, Sen
    Luo, Shuqing
    Xiao, Zhongzhou
    Lu, Lu
    Liang, Bilin
    Liu, Sichen
    Shi, Huwei
    Xu, Jie
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2023, 177
  • [2] Machine learning for prediction of viral hepatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Moulaei, Khadijeh
    Sharifi, Hamid
    Bahaadinbeigy, Kambiz
    Haghdoost, Ali Akbar
    Nasiri, Naser
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2023, 179
  • [3] Machine learning in the prediction of depression treatment outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sajjadian, Mehri
    Lam, Raymond W.
    Milev, Roumen
    Rotzinger, Susan
    Frey, Benicio N.
    Soares, Claudio N.
    Parikh, Sagar V.
    Foster, Jane A.
    Turecki, Gustavo
    Muller, Daniel J.
    Strother, Stephen C.
    Farzan, Faranak
    Kennedy, Sidney H.
    Uher, Rudolf
    PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2021, 51 (16) : 2742 - 2751
  • [4] Systematic review and network meta-analysis of machine learning algorithms in sepsis prediction
    Gao, Yulei
    Wang, Chaolan
    Shen, Jiaxin
    Wang, Ziyi
    Liu, Yancun
    Chai, Yanfen
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2024, 245
  • [5] Machine learning-based diagnosis and prognosis of IgAN: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhuang, Kaiting
    Wang, Wenjuan
    Xu, Cheng
    Guo, Xinru
    Ren, Xuejing
    Liang, Yanjun
    Duan, Zhiyu
    Song, Yanqi
    Zhang, Yifan
    Cai, Guangyan
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (12)
  • [6] Tissue Biomarkers for Prognosis in Cutaneous Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Rothberg, Bonnie E. Gould
    Bracken, Michael B.
    Rimm, David L.
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2009, 101 (07): : 452 - 474
  • [7] Machine Learning-Based Prediction Models for Delirium: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Xie, Qi
    Wang, Xinglei
    Pei, Juhong
    Wu, Yinping
    Guo, Qiang
    Su, Yujie
    Yan, Hui
    Nan, Ruiling
    Chen, Haixia
    Dou, Xinman
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION, 2022, 23 (10) : 1655 - +
  • [8] Machine Learning for Prediction of Postoperative Delirium in Adult Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Chen, Hao
    Yu, Dongdong
    Zhang, Jing
    Li, Jianli
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2024, 46 (12) : 1069 - 1081
  • [9] Machine learning for the prediction of sepsis-related death: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Yan
    Xu, Weiwei
    Yang, Ping
    Zhang, An
    BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [10] Machine learning prediction models for diabetic kidney disease: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chen, Lianqin
    Shao, Xian
    Yu, Pei
    ENDOCRINE, 2024, 84 (03) : 890 - 902