Preferred sources of information on diabetes prevention programmes: a population-based cross-sectional study in Poland

被引:0
作者
Grudziaz-Sekowska, Justyna [1 ]
Sekowski, Kuba [1 ]
Pinkas, Jaroslaw [1 ]
Jankowski, Mateusz [1 ]
机构
[1] Ctr Med Ksztalcen Podyplomowego, Sch Publ Hlth, Warsaw, Poland
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2024年 / 14卷 / 05期
关键词
diabetes & endocrinology; preventive medicine; health education; HEALTH INFORMATION; SEEKING BEHAVIOR; E-MAIL; CARE; INTERNET;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083362
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective This study aimed to analyse preferred sources of information on diabetes prevention programmes and to identify sociodemographic determinants influencing these preferences among adults in Poland. Design A cross-sectional survey was carried out between 15 and 18 September 2023 using a computer-assisted web interview. A self-prepared questionnaire included 10 questions on sources of information on type 2 diabetes prevention. Participants Data were obtained from 1046 adults (18-82 years); 53.4% were females. Results Most respondents preferred email communication (46.4%), followed by a doctor or nurse (33.5%), and a letter or leaflet directly delivered to the mailbox (25.8%) for type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) prevention information. Younger respondents were more likely to indicate mass media (OR=1.81, 95% CI=1.12 to 2.95, p=0.01) and digital media (OR=1.65, 95% CI=1.02 to 2.67, p=0.04) as a source of information on DM2 prevention. Those who had higher education (OR=1.51, 95% CI=1.16 to 1.96, p=0.002), as well as those with chronic diseases (OR=1.50, 95% CI=1.14 to 1.97, p=0.004), were more likely to indicate digital media. Out of 10 different variables analysed in this study, passive occupational status (OR=1.43, 95% CI=1.04 to 1.96, p=0.03) as well as having chronic diseases (OR=1.51, 95% CI=1.16 to 1.96, p=0.002) were associated with higher odds of indicating healthcare workers as a preferred source of information. Marital status, having children, place of residence, household characteristics and financial status do not significantly decide communication preferences. Conclusion Communication on DM2 prevention should be adjusted to public preferences and expectations. Tailoring interventions to different demographic groups can enhance outreach and engagement. Email emerged as a popular choice, suggesting the potential of digital communication in preventive health programmes.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [1] Patient portal use: Persistent disparities from pre- to post-onset of the COVID-19 pandemic
    Ahmed, Naheed
    Sanghavi, Kavya
    Mathur, Shrey
    Mccullers, Asli
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2023, 178
  • [2] Social media as a recruitment platform for a nationwide online survey of COVID-19 knowledge, beliefs, and practices in the United States: methodology and feasibility analysis
    Ali, Shahmir H.
    Foreman, Joshua
    Capasso, Ariadna
    Jones, Abbey M.
    Tozan, Yesim
    DiClemente, Ralph J.
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [3] Burden of disease and costs associated with type 2 diabetes in emerging and established markets: systematic review analyses
    Alzaid, Aus
    Ladron de Guevara, Patricia
    Beillat, Maud
    Lehner Martin, Valerie
    Atanasov, Petar
    [J]. EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2021, 21 (04) : 785 - 798
  • [4] Health care system and patient-related factors affecting low cancer screening participation in Poland
    Andrzejczak, A.
    Rucinska, M.
    Zarlok, E.
    Osowiecka, K.
    [J]. PREVENTIVE MEDICINE REPORTS, 2023, 36
  • [5] Use of the Internet and e-mail for health care information - Results from a national survey
    Baker, L
    Wagner, TH
    Singer, S
    Bundorf, MK
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 289 (18): : 2400 - 2406
  • [6] A systematic review of recruitment strategies and behaviour change techniques in group-based diabetes prevention programmes focusing on uptake and retention
    Begum, Sonia
    Povey, Rachel
    Ellis, Naomi
    Gidlow, Christopher
    [J]. DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2020, 166
  • [7] Engaging patients to improve quality of care: a systematic review
    Bombard, Yvonne
    Baker, G. Ross
    Orlando, Elaina
    Fancott, Carol
    Bhatia, Pooja
    Casalino, Selina
    Onate, Kanecy
    Denis, Jean-Louis
    Pomey, Marie-Pascale
    [J]. IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2018, 13
  • [8] Digital Clinical Trials for Substance Use Disorders in the Age of Covid-19
    Brezing, Christina A.
    Luo, Sean X.
    Mariani, John J.
    Levin, Frances R.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADDICTION MEDICINE, 2020, 14 (06) : E297 - E302
  • [9] The Impact of Online Health Information on Patient Health Behaviours and Making Decisions Concerning Health
    Bujnowska-Fedak, Maria Magdalena
    Wegierek, Paulina
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (03)
  • [10] Patient safety in marginalised groups: a narrative scoping review
    Cheraghi-Sohi, Sudeh
    Panagioti, Maria
    Daker-White, Gavin
    Giles, Sally
    Riste, Lisa
    Kirk, Sue
    Ong, Bie Nio
    Poppleton, Aaron
    Campbell, Stephen
    Sanders, Caroline
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR EQUITY IN HEALTH, 2020, 19 (01)