Implementing the EU LULUCF regulation in Norway: Short-term and long-term policy coherence challenges

被引:3
作者
Gulbrandsen, Lars H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Fridtjof Nansen Inst Polhogda, Fridtjof Nansens vei 17, N-1366 Lysaker, Norway
关键词
Climate policy; EU; Forestry; Land use; Norway; Policy coherence; CLIMATE; INTEGRATION; INCONSISTENCY;
D O I
10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103270
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Forests play a significant role in Norway's Land Use, Land-Use Change, and Forestry (LULUCF) sector, where the forest sink is equal to about 40% of the national emissions from all other sectors combined. Although not an EU member, Norway has adopted the EU LULUCF regulation through a climate agreement with the EU. This article examines how the LULUCF regulation influences the coherence of Norway's forest policies. Adopting the regulation initially received little public debate, but there is increasing political contestation over how to achieve the LULUCF net carbon dioxide removal target. In the short term, reaching the target might imply rapidly reducing forest harvest, but this would decrease activity in the forestry sector and the supply of harvested wood products that could involve substituting less climate-friendly materials and energy sources. From a long-term perspective, forest management efforts like denser planting, fertilization, harvesting, and rejuvenation might be needed to increase the forest sink capacity. Such policies are supported by forest owners and forestry organizations, but they are opposed by some environmental NGOs and other stakeholders advocating for the protection of forests and biological diversity. The study concludes that assessments of coherence crucially depend on how problems are defined and the time perspective adopted.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] Alfredsen G., 2018, NIBIO-rapport, V4
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2019, Climate change and land
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2021, Biogas Norway9 September
  • [5] Evaluating the terrestrial carbon dioxide removal potential of improved forest management and accelerated forest conversion in Norway
    Bright, Ryan M.
    Allen, Micky
    Anton-Fernandez, Clara
    Belbo, Helmer
    Dalsgaard, Lise
    Eisner, Stephanie
    Granhus, Aksel
    Kjonaas, Olaug J.
    Sogaard, Gunnhild
    Astrup, Rasmus
    [J]. GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2020, 26 (09) : 5087 - 5105
  • [6] Confederation of Norwegian Enterprise, 2021, NHOs innspill til 'Fit for 55' oppdateringen av byrdefordeling (ESR), skog og annen arealbruk (LULUCF)
  • [7] Dupont C., 2016, Climate Policy Integration into EU Energy Policy Progress and prospects, DOI 10.4324/9781315751665
  • [8] Farstad F.M., 2021, Rapport 2021:07
  • [9] Fauchald O.K., 2016, Wilderness Protection in Europe: The Role of International, European and National law, P386
  • [10] Fischer F., 1995, EVALUATING PUBLIC PO