Exploring the Pathways of Diabetes Foot Complications Treatment and Investigating Experiences From Frontline Health Care Professionals: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study

被引:1
|
作者
Andrikopoulou, Elisavet [1 ]
Chatzistergos, Panagiotis [2 ,3 ]
Chockalingam, Nachiappan [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Portsmouth, Sch Comp Sci, Portsmouth PO1 2E6, Hants, England
[2] Staffordshire Univ, Ctr Biomech & Rehabil Technol, Stoke On Trent, England
[3] Staffordshire Univ, Ctr Biomech & Rehabil Technol, Sci Ctr, Leek Rd, Stoke On Trent ST4 2DF, England
来源
JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS | 2024年 / 13卷
关键词
diabetic foot; first-ever diabetic foot ulcer; qualitative research; quantitative evaluation; surveys and questionnaires; telephone interviews; primary care; community care; acute care; education of patients; foot ulcer; exploration; diabetes; foot ulceration; United Kingdom; diabetic foot ulceration; DFU; amputation; complication; perspectives; experiences; health care professionals; barrier; barriers; effective care; foot care; primary ulcers; quality of life; LOWER-LIMB AMPUTATION; PEOPLE;
D O I
10.2196/54852
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Diabetes affects more than 4.3 million individuals in the United Kingdom, with 19% to 34% developing diabetes -related foot ulceration (DFU) during their lifespan, which can lead to an amputation. In the United Kingdom, every week, approximately 169 people have an amputation due to diabetes. Preventing first -ever ulcers is the most effective strategy to reduce the occurrence of diabetes -related amputations, but research in this space is lacking. Objective: This protocol seeks to document the experiences and perspectives of frontline health care professionals who work with people who have diabetes and diabetes -related foot problems. Special attention is given to their perceptions of barriers to effective care, their views about barriers to effective and inclusive engagement with people with diabetes, and their experience with the first -ever DFU. Another aspect of the study is the focus on whether clinical management is affected by data sharing, data availability, and interoperability issues. Methods: This is a mixed methods explanatory protocol, which is sequential, and its purpose is to use the qualitative data to explain the initial quantitative data collected through a survey of frontline health care professionals. Data analysis of quantitative data will be completed first and then synthesized with the qualitative data analysis. Qualitative data will be analyzed using the framework method. This study will use joint displays to integrate the data. Ethical approval has been granted by the ethics committee of Staffordshire University. Results: The quantitative data collection started in March 2023 and will close in May 2024. The qualitative interviews commenced in November 2023 with volunteer participants who initially completed the survey. Conclusions: This study's survey focuses on data interoperability and the interviews focus more on the perspectives and experiences of clinicians and their perceived barriers for the effective management of diabetes foot ulcers. Including a geographically relevant and diverse cohort of health care professionals that spans a wide range of roles and care settings involved in diabetes -related foot care is very important for the successful application of this protocol. Special care is given to advertise and promote participation as widely as possible. The qualitative part of this protocol is also limited to 30-40 interview participants, as it is not realistic to interview higher numbers, due to time and resource constraints.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Mental Health Care Experiences of Trans Service Members and Veterans: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Shaine, Megan J. Doughty
    Cor, Deanna N.
    Campbell, Andrew J.
    McAlister, Abbey L.
    JOURNAL OF COUNSELING AND DEVELOPMENT, 2021, 99 (03) : 273 - 288
  • [42] Exploring the experiences of changes to support access to primary health care services and the impact on the quality and safety of care for homeless people during the COVID-19 pandemic: a study protocol for a qualitative mixed methods approach
    Howells, Kelly
    Burrows, Martin
    Amp, Mat
    Brennan, Rachel
    Yeung, Wan-Ley
    Jackson, Shaun
    Dickinson, Joanne
    Draper, Julie
    Campbell, Stephen
    Ashcroft, Darren
    Blakeman, Tom
    Sanders, Caroline
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR EQUITY IN HEALTH, 2021, 20 (01)
  • [43] Exploring the experiences of changes to support access to primary health care services and the impact on the quality and safety of care for homeless people during the COVID-19 pandemic: a study protocol for a qualitative mixed methods approach
    Kelly Howells
    Martin Burrows
    Mat Amp
    Rachel Brennan
    Wan-Ley Yeung
    Shaun Jackson
    Joanne Dickinson
    Julie Draper
    Stephen Campbell
    Darren Ashcroft
    Tom Blakeman
    Caroline Sanders
    International Journal for Equity in Health, 20
  • [44] Developing a professional guideline for the use of cyberspace by health-care professionals in Iran: a mixed methods study
    Mafinejad, Mahboobeh Khabaz
    Kadivar, Maliheh
    Asghari, Fariba
    Jannat, Zeinab
    Hadizadeh, Nastaran
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS AND HISTORY OF MEDICINE, 2022, 15
  • [45] Investigating mortality and morbidity associated with UrINary incontinence during Older Womens Secondary Care Admissions and exploring nurses experiences of delivering related care (U-INconti): a mixed methods research protocol
    Iles-Smith, Heather
    McMillan, Isobel May
    Evans-Cheung, Trina
    Eckersley, Ruth Haas
    Russell, Margaret
    Wood, Julie
    McCarthy, Robyn Emelda
    Rosson, Lyndsey
    Doxford-Hook, Liz
    Fu, Yu
    McGowan, Linda
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (10):
  • [46] Non-financial barriers in oral health care: a qualitative study of patients receiving opioid maintenance treatment and professionals' experiences
    Carlsen, Siv-Elin Leirvaag
    Isaksen, Katja
    Fadnes, Lars Thore
    Lygren, Ole Jorgen Scheie
    Astrom, Anne Nordrehaug
    SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT PREVENTION AND POLICY, 2021, 16 (01)
  • [47] Perceived Benefits, Barriers, and Facilitators of a Digital Patient-Reported Outcomes Tool for Routine Diabetes Care: Protocol for a National, Multicenter, Mixed Methods Implementation Study
    Skovlund, Soren Eik
    Nicolucci, Antonio
    Balk-Moller, Nina
    Berthelsen, Dorthe B.
    Glumer, Charlotte
    Perrild, Hans
    Kjaer, Pernille
    Norgaard, Lise Mellergaard
    Troelsen, Lise Havbaek
    Pietraszek, Anna
    Hessler, Danielle
    Kaplan, Sherrie
    Ejskjaer, Niels
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2021, 10 (09):
  • [48] Experiences and perceptions of health care professionals making treatment decisions for older adults with memory loss: a qualitative systematic review protocol
    Shapkin, Kimberly
    MacKinnon, Karen
    Sangster-Gormley, Esther
    Newton, Lorelei
    Holroyd-Leduc, Jayna
    JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2022, 20 (11) : 2799 - 2805
  • [49] Exploring Empathy and Compassion Using Digital Narratives (the Learning to Care Project): Protocol for a Multiphase Mixed Methods Study
    Ferrari, Manuela
    Fazeli, Sahar
    Mitchell, Claudia
    Shah, Jai
    Iyer, Srividya N.
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2022, 11 (01):
  • [50] Quality and barriers of outpatient diabetes care in rural health facilities in Uganda – a mixed methods study
    Catherine Birabwa
    Mulekya F. Bwambale
    Peter Waiswa
    Roy W. Mayega
    BMC Health Services Research, 19