The subject of literature, the subject of philosophy: Plato, Wittgenstein, and Kierkegaard's reading of Abraham

被引:0
作者
Dauber, Kenneth [1 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/phin.12424
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
Though Plato, famously, had Socrates ban the poets from his republic while Wittgenstein seems to aspire to a style of philosophical writing that approaches the literary, there is a troubling similarity between them in their elision of the self as a self. Saying what he means in the mode of the philosopher or meaning what he says in the mode of the poet, how can the self both be and say itself? The misprision of Abraham's binding of Isaac in the thinking of Kierkegaard, who with Plato was one of Wittgenstein's favourite philosophers, is a telling opening into the question of the self in its responsibilities and its discontents.
引用
收藏
页码:298 / 310
页数:13
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
Cavell, 1984, Themes Out of School, P195
[2]  
Cavell S., 1969, Must We Mean What We Say?, P163
[3]  
Cavell S., 1999, The Claim of Reason: Wittgenstein, Skepticism, Morality, and Tragedy, P496
[4]  
Cavell Stanley., 2013, This New Yet UnapproachableAmerica: Lectures afterEmerson after Wittgenstein
[5]  
Conant J, 1995, CLAREMON STUD PHILOS, P248
[6]  
Conant James., 1993, PURSUITS REASON ESSA, P195
[7]  
Dauber Jonathan., 2012, KNOWLEDGE GOD DEV EA
[8]  
Eagleton T., 1983, Literary theory: An introduction, P1
[9]  
Eliot T.S., 1918, The Little Review, V5, P46
[10]  
Emerson R.W., 1837, The American Scholar', P65