Life cycle assessment and circular practices in the woodworking sector: a systematic review

被引:4
作者
van den Auwelant, Ewald [1 ,3 ]
Nimmegeers, Philippe [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Van Passel, Steven [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Antwerp, Fac Business & Econ, Dept Engn Management, EnvEcon, Prinsstraat 13, B-2000 Antwerp, Belgium
[2] Univ Antwerp, Fac Appl Engn, iPRACS, Groenenborgerlaan 171, B-2020 Antwerp, Belgium
[3] Flanders MakeUAntwerp, B-2000 Antwerp, Belgium
[4] Nanolab Ctr Excellence, Prinsstraat 13, B-2000 Antwerp, Belgium
关键词
Life cycle assessment; Woodworking sector; Forest-based products; Timber; Green economy; Circular strategies; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; WOOD; CARBON; BUILDINGS; PRODUCTS; UNCERTAINTY; EMISSIONS; ECONOMY; BIOMASS;
D O I
10.1007/s10098-024-02915-x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
To shift toward a bio-based and circular economy, wood is seen as a key component. To assess the environmental impact of wood utilization, life cycle assessment (LCA) is used. However, current LCAs lack comparability. To be comparable, LCAs must be reproducible, transparent, and follow the same approach. Hence, the goal of the study is to identify the level of harmonization among state-of-the-art LCA applications within the woodworking sector via a comprehensive systematic literature review. The results show that LCA has been applied to various products and processes in the woodworking sector and highlight the predominance of the construction sector. Examining the different LCA phases, different approaches and policies are identified. Recommendations are presented on how LCAs for the woodworking sector can be streamlined. This involves general recommendations for LCA practitioners and policymakers to have at least a cradle-to-grave approach, a standardization of the background and the technical backbone of the foreground system, a harmonized impact assessment method, and performing a sensitivity analysis for the interpretation of the results. For woodworking specifically, temporal, and spatial considerations, accounting for timing of emissions and land use (change), should be included as well as proper End-of-Life considerations via a cascading approach. The increased adoption of wood as a clean technology offers a promising environmental performance; particularly, if forests are sustainably managed, wood modifications are non-fossil and non-toxic, and circular strategies are incorporated. To fully realize its potential, it is essential to standardize LCA methodologies which can set an example to support regulatory policies.
引用
收藏
页码:1673 / 1692
页数:20
相关论文
共 102 条
[1]   Towards an optimal coverage of ecosystem services in LCA [J].
Alejandre, Elizabeth M. ;
van Bodegom, Peter M. ;
Guinee, Jeroen B. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 231 :714-722
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Global guidance principles for Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) databases: A basis for greener processes and products
[3]   Life cycle assessment as a guide for designing circular business models in the wood panel industry: A critical review [J].
Araujo, Cristiane Karyn de Carvalho ;
Ferreira, Mariane Bigarelli ;
Salvador, Rodrigo ;
Araujo, Camilla Kawane Ceciliano de Carvalho ;
Camargo, Bruno Silva ;
Camargo, Samique Kyene de Carvalho Araujo ;
de Campos, Cristiane Inacio ;
Piekarski, Cassiano Moro .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2022, 355
[4]   Cradle-to-gate Life Cycle Assessment of bio-adhesives for the wood panel industry. A comparison with petrochemical alternatives [J].
Arias, Ana ;
Gonzalez-Garcia, Sara ;
Gonzalez-Rodriguez, Sandra ;
Feijoo, Gumersindo ;
Teresa Moreira, Maria .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 738 (738)
[5]   Product Environmental Footprint (PEF) Pilot Phase-Comparability over Flexibility? [J].
Bach, Vanessa ;
Lehmann, Annekatrin ;
Goermer, Marcel ;
Finkbeiner, Matthias .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (08)
[6]   Applying three pillar indicator assessments on alternative floor systems: life cycle study [J].
Balasbaneh, Ali Tighnavard ;
Yeoh, David ;
Juki, Mohd Irwan ;
Gohari, Adel ;
Abidin, Ahmad Razin Zainal ;
Marsono, Abdul Kadir Bin .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2021, 26 (07) :1439-1455
[7]   Comparing sources and analysis of uncertainty in consequential and attributional life cycle assessment: review of current practice and recommendations [J].
Bamber, Nicole ;
Turner, Ian ;
Arulnathan, Vivek ;
Li, Yang ;
Zargar Ershadi, Shiva ;
Smart, Alyssa ;
Pelletier, Nathan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2020, 25 (01) :168-180
[8]   Integrating Regionalized Socioeconomic Considerations onto Life Cycle Assessment for Evaluating Bioeconomy Value Chains: A Case Study on Hybrid Wood-Concrete Ceiling Elements [J].
Bezama, Alberto ;
Hildebrandt, Jakob ;
Thraen, Daniela .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (08)
[9]   Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy [J].
Bocken, Nancy M. P. ;
de Pauw, Ingrid ;
Bakker, Conny ;
van der Grinten, Bram .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL AND PRODUCTION ENGINEERING, 2016, 33 (05) :308-320
[10]  
Botyriute K, 2022, NEW HOUSING CONSTRUC