Optimal extent of lymphadenectomy improves prognosis and guides adjuvant chemotherapy in esophageal cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Tang, Ji-Ming [1 ]
Huang, Shu-Jie [1 ]
Chen, Qi-Bin [1 ]
Wu, Han-Sheng [2 ]
Qiao, Gui-Bin [1 ]
机构
[1] Guangdong Prov Peoples Hosp, Dept Thorac Surg, Guangzhou 510080, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Shantou Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Med Coll, Dept Thorac Surg, Shantou 515041, Guangdong, Peoples R China
来源
WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY | 2024年 / 16卷 / 06期
关键词
Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma; Lymphadenectomy; Adjuvant chemotherapy; Prognosis; Nomogram;
D O I
10.4240/wjgs.v16.i6.1537
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND The optimal extent of lymphadenectomy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients remained debatable. AIM To explore the ideal number of cleared lymph nodes in ESCC patients undergoing upfront surgery. METHODS In this retrospective, propensity score-matched study, we included 1042 ESCC patients who underwent esophagectomy from November 2008 and October 2019. Patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy were excluded. We collected patients' clinicopathological features and information regarding lymph nodes, including the total number of resected lymph nodes (NRLN), and pathologically diagnosed positive lymph nodes (RPLN). SPSS and R software were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS Among the included 1042 patients, two cohorts: <= 21 (n = 664) and > 21 NRLN (n = 378) were identified. The final prognostic model included four variables: T stage, N, venous thrombus, and the number of removed lymph nodes. Among them, NRLN > 21 was determined as an independent prognosticator after surgery for esophageal cancer (hazards regression = 0.66, 95% confidence interval: 0.50-0.87, P = 0.004). A nomogram was created based on the regression coefficients of the variables in the final model. In the training cohort, the predictive model displayed an uncorrected five-year overall survival C-index of 0.659, with a bootstrap-corrected C-index of 0.654. In the subgroup analysis, adjuvant chemotherapy was beneficial in the subgroup with NRLN > 21 and RPLN <= 0.16 and NRLN <= 21 and RPLN > 0.16. CONCLUSION NRLN > 21 was an independent prognostic factor after ESCC surgery. The combination of NRLN and RPLN may provide a reference for adjuvant chemotherapy use in potential beneficiaries.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Clinical outcomes of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis
    Moon, Duk Hwan
    Lee, Jong Mog
    Jeon, Jae Hyun
    Yang, Hee Chul
    Kim, Moon Soo
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2017, 9 (09) : 3005 - 3012
  • [22] Survival benefit of re-irradiation in esophageal Cancer patients with Locoregional recurrence: a propensity score-matched analysis
    Liang Hong
    Yun-xia Huang
    Qing-yang Zhuang
    Xue-qing Zhang
    Li-rui Tang
    Kai-xin Du
    Xiao-yi Lin
    Bu-hong Zheng
    Shao-li Cai
    Jun-xin Wu
    Jin-luan Li
    Radiation Oncology, 13
  • [23] Comparison of Prognosis Between Juvenile and Adult Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
    Chen, Chuanben
    Chen, Qinyan
    Xu, Yuanji
    Zheng, Wei
    Lin, Zhizhong
    Wu, Zijie
    Ye, Wangzhong
    Huang, Xinyi
    Lin, Xiurong
    Bai, Penggang
    CANCER MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH, 2020, 12 : 8613 - 8621
  • [24] Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index Predicts Prognosis of Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Propensity Score-matched Analysis
    Geng, Yiting
    Shao, Yingjie
    Zhu, Danxia
    Zheng, Xiao
    Zhou, Qi
    Zhou, Wenjie
    Ni, Xuefeng
    Wu, Changping
    Jiang, Jingting
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2016, 6
  • [25] Survival benefit of re-irradiation in esophageal Cancer patients with Locoregional recurrence: a propensity score-matched analysis
    Hong, Liang
    Huang, Yun-xia
    Zhuang, Qing-yang
    Zhang, Xue-qing
    Tang, Li-rui
    Du, Kai-xin
    Lin, Xiao-yi
    Zheng, Bu-hong
    Cai, Shao-li
    Wu, Jun-xin
    Li, Jin-Luan
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2018, 13 : 171
  • [26] Doxifluridine versus Tegafur/Gimeracil/Oteracil (S-1) as adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with gastric cancer after gastrectomy: A propensity score-matched analysis
    Jeong, Ji Yoon
    Seo, Sang Hyuk
    Kim, Kwang Hee
    An, Min Sung
    Baik, Hyungjoo
    Kang, Sang Hyun
    Oh, Sang Hoon
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 46 (09) : 3656 - 3662
  • [27] Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy for the treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matched study from the National Cancer Center in China
    Zhang, Guochao
    Zhang, Chaoqi
    Sun, Nan
    Xue, Liyan
    Yang, Zhaoyang
    Fang, Lingling
    Zhang, Zhihui
    Luo, Yuejun
    Gao, Shugeng
    Xue, Qi
    Mu, Juwei
    Gao, Yushun
    Tan, Fengwei
    He, Jie
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2022, 148 (04) : 943 - 954
  • [28] Oncological outcomes of robotic pancreatectomy in patients with pancreatic cancer who receive adjuvant chemotherapy: A propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study
    Weng, Yuanchi
    Shen, Ziyun
    Gemenetzis, Georgios
    Jin, Jiabin
    Chen, Haoda
    Deng, Xiaxing
    Peng, Chenghong
    Shen, Baiyong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2022, 104
  • [29] Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy for the treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matched study from the National Cancer Center in China
    Guochao Zhang
    Chaoqi Zhang
    Nan Sun
    Liyan Xue
    Zhaoyang Yang
    Lingling Fang
    Zhihui Zhang
    Yuejun Luo
    Shugeng Gao
    Qi Xue
    Juwei Mu
    Yushun Gao
    Fengwei Tan
    Jie He
    Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, 2022, 148 : 943 - 954
  • [30] The influence of thoracic duct ligation on long-term survival of patients with esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis
    Fei, Xiang
    Wang, Xinyu
    Lu, Qijue
    Lu, Chaojing
    Chen, Hezhong
    Li, Chunguang
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2020, 12 (10) : 5532 - 5541