Democratic values, relative deprivation, political trust, and the resilience of corruption in Portugal: a survey analysis

被引:0
作者
Clemente, Felippe [1 ]
De Sousa, Luis [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lisbon, Inst Ciencias Sociais, Ave Prof Anibal Bettencourt 9, P-1600189 Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
Corruption; Tolerance; Egocentric perceptions; Democratic values; Political trust; LEGITIMACY; QUALITY; INSTITUTIONS; PERCEPTIONS; ATTITUDES; SUPPORT; ACCESS; DISSATISFACTION; ACCOUNTABILITY; SATISFACTION;
D O I
10.1007/s10611-024-10156-8
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Corruption is commonly defined as deviant behaviour that strays from established legal and formal norms, as well as expected conduct when fulfilling official duties and responsibilities. It is essential to stress that the acceptance or condemnation of such behaviour hinges primarily on how well evaluators comprehend these standards. This implies that citizens' assessments of the impact of corruption on their lives and society are heavily influenced by the values they hold dear within a democracy and their trust in democratic institutions to uphold and safeguard those values. Based on recently collected survey data, we demonstrate that citizens' adherence to process-oriented democratic values, their feeling of relative deprivation and their level of political trust significantly affect their egocentric perceptions of the effects of corruption and tolerance towards corruption. Furthermore, we find that control variables, such as self-reported experiences of corruption, age, education, income, and exposure to social media, also exert a significant influence on our dependent variables. By linking citizens' egocentric perceived corruption effects and intolerance towards corruption with their procedural notion of democracy, feeling of relative deprivation and political trust, this study contributes to the understanding of the resilience of this intricate phenomenon in democratic societies.
引用
收藏
页码:517 / 541
页数:25
相关论文
共 93 条
[1]   Are you being served?: Political accountability and quality of government [J].
Adserà, A ;
Boix, C ;
Payne, M .
JOURNAL OF LAW ECONOMICS & ORGANIZATION, 2003, 19 (02) :445-490
[2]   On either side of a moat? Elite and mass attitudes towards right and wrong [J].
Allen, Nicholas ;
Birch, Sarah .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL RESEARCH, 2012, 51 (01) :89-116
[3]   Low-Level Corruption Tolerance: An "Action-Based" Approach for Peru and Latin America [J].
Alvarez, Joseph Pozsgai .
JOURNAL OF POLITICS IN LATIN AMERICA, 2015, 7 (02) :99-129
[4]   Political institutions and satisfaction with democracy: A cross-national analysis of consensus and majoritarian systems [J].
Anderson, CJ ;
Guillory, CA .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1997, 91 (01) :66-81
[5]  
Anderson CJ, 2003, AM J POLIT SCI, V47, P91, DOI 10.1111/1540-5907.00007
[6]   Transparency, corruption, and mismanagement: an analysis of Brazilian municipalities [J].
Batista, Mariana ;
Rocha, Virginia ;
Alves dos Santos, Jose Luiz .
REVISTA DE ADMINISTRACAO PUBLICA, 2020, 54 (05) :1382-1401
[7]  
Becquart-Leclercq J., 1984, Pouvoirs, Revue Francaise Detudes Constitutionnelles et Politiques, V31, P19
[8]  
Beetham D., 1994, DEFINING MEASURING D
[9]   Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies [J].
Bertot, John C. ;
Jaeger, Paul T. ;
Grimes, Justin M. .
GOVERNMENT INFORMATION QUARTERLY, 2010, 27 (03) :264-271
[10]  
Blundo G., 2003, EVERYDAY CORRUPTION