Enhancing decision-making in Australian concrete construction: a decision support model using an Entropy-TOPSIS approach

被引:0
作者
Pouraghajan, Marjan [1 ]
Omrani, Sara [2 ]
Drogemuller, Robin [3 ]
机构
[1] Queensland Univ Technol, Brisbane, Australia
[2] Queensland Univ Technol, Dept Architecture & Built Environm, Brisbane, Australia
[3] Queensland Univ Technol, Fac Sci & Engn, Dept Civil Engn & Built Environm, Brisbane, Australia
关键词
Concrete construction system; Decision-making; TOPSIS; Entropy; Influential criteria; PREFABRICATION; SELECTION; CRITERIA; FRAMEWORK; PRECAST; COST;
D O I
10.1108/ECAM-01-2024-0062
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
PurposeThis study addresses the global landscape of offsite construction, highlighting its variable adoption patterns and the challenge posed by the prevalent use of suboptimal decision-making methods. In response, the decision-making model seeks to equip decision-makers with tools for well-informed decisions on concrete construction systems, tailored to the unique characteristics of each project, in contrast to the persisting reliance on expert knowledge, checklists or similar tools.Design/methodology/approachThe study extracts decision-making criteria through literature reviews, pilot studies and surveys amongst Australian construction professionals. A comprehensive comparison of four concrete systems against each identified criterion is conducted, followed by the application of an integrated decision model (Entropy-TOPSIS) to rank the systems, considering all criteria simultaneously. Real-world case studies validate the practical applicability of the model.FindingsAn analysis of 15 criteria demonstrated the multifaceted nature of selecting concrete construction systems, emphasising evolving industry priorities like time efficiency, environmental considerations and logistical constraints. The enduring appeal of in-situ concrete in complex projects underscores the significance of traditional methods. The integration of the Entropy-TOPSIS model proved to be a robust decision-making tool, enabling professionals to simultaneously consider all criteria and make well-informed, customised decisions.Originality/valueThe study's originality lies in its comprehensive approach, considering diverse criteria and presenting a flexible decision-making model suitable for the dynamic demands of the construction industry.
引用
收藏
页数:30
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Modular Construction: Determining Decision-Making Factors and Future Research Needs
    Abdul Nabi, Mohamad
    El-adaway, Islam H.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT IN ENGINEERING, 2020, 36 (06)
  • [2] Lean approach in precast concrete component production
    Ahmad, Suryani
    Soetanto, Robby
    Goodier, Chris
    [J]. BUILT ENVIRONMENT PROJECT AND ASSET MANAGEMENT, 2019, 9 (03) : 457 - 470
  • [3] Analysis of Criteria Influencing Contractor Selection Using TOPSIS Method
    Alptekin, Orkun
    Alptekin, Nesrin
    [J]. WORLD MULTIDISCIPLINARY CIVIL ENGINEERING-ARCHITECTURE-URBAN PLANNING SYMPOSIUM - WMCAUS, 2017, 245
  • [4] Fuzzy-Based Life-Cycle Cost Model for Decision Making under Subjectivity
    Ammar, Mohammad
    Zayed, Tarek
    Moselhi, Osama
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2013, 139 (05) : 556 - 563
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2022, Discover trends in the Australian Jobs Market
  • [6] [Anonymous], 1998, The mathematical theory of communication
  • [7] Optimizing decisions in advanced manufacturing of prefabricated products: Theorizing supply chain configurations in off-site construction
    Arashpour, Mehrdad
    Bai, Yu
    Aranda-mena, Guillermo
    Bab-Hadiashar, Alireza
    Hosseini, Reza
    Kalutara, Pushpitha
    [J]. AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2017, 84 : 146 - 153
  • [8] Life cycle sustainability assessment analysis of different concrete construction techniques for residential building in Malaysia
    Balasbaneh, Ali Tighnavard
    Sher, Willy
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2021, 26 (07) : 1301 - 1318
  • [9] Bartoszyski R., 2007, Probability and Statistical Inference, Second Edition: Bartoszyski/Probability
  • [10] Basahel A., 2016, International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering, V6, P728, DOI DOI 10.2495/SAFE-V6-N4-728-745