Efficacy and safety of ciprofol versus propofol for induction of general anaesthesia or sedation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

被引:2
|
作者
Saeed, Abdallah [1 ]
Elewidi, Mariam [1 ]
Nawlo, Ahmad [2 ]
Elzahaby, Amr [1 ]
Khaled, Asmaa [1 ]
Othman, Abdalla [1 ]
Abuelazm, Mohamed [1 ]
Abdelazeem, Basel [3 ]
机构
[1] Tanta Univ, Fac Med, El Bahr St, Tanta, Gharbia, Egypt
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Infect Dis, Boston, MA USA
[3] West Virginia Univ, Dept Cardiol, Morgantown, WV USA
关键词
Ciprofol; general anaesthesia; meta-analysis; pain; propofol; sedation; systematic review; PARALLEL-GROUP; SINGLE-BLIND; MULTICENTER; MAINTENANCE; PHASE-3;
D O I
10.4103/ija.ija_104_24
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background and Aims: Propofol has been used in medical practice as an anaesthetic drug for producing and sustaining general anaesthesia due to its advantages. However, it also has drawbacks, including injection-related discomfort. Recently, ciprofol has emerged as a promising anaesthetic drug that may overcome many drawbacks associated with propofol. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we assess the efficacy and safety of ciprofol compared to propofol in different anaesthesia procedures. Methods: The study protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (ID: CRD42023458170). Central, PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus and WOS were searched for English literature until 26 February 2024. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan. The risk of bias was assessed using the RoB 2.0 tool. Results were reported as risk ratios (RRs), mean differences (MDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Nineteen randomised controlled trials were included in our analysis, with 2841 participants. There was no difference between ciprofol and propofol in the success rate of endoscopy (RR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.99, 1.02; P = 0.44), while ciprofol showed a significant increase in the success rate of general anaesthesia/sedation (RR: 1.01, 95% CI: 1.00, 1.02; P = 0.04). Ciprofol showed significantly lower pain on injection (RR: 0.14, 95% CI: 0.09, 0.22; P < 0.001), lower adverse events (RR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.69, 0.92; P = 0.002) and higher patient satisfaction (standardised mean difference (SMD): 0.36, 95% CI: 0.24, 0.48; P < 0.001). Conclusion: Ciprofol exhibited a comparable efficacy to propofol in inducing general anaesthesia and sedation with fewer adverse events, less pain on injection and higher patient satisfaction. These collective findings may suggest that ciprofol can be used as an alternative drug to ensure effective general anaesthesia/sedation induction in the future.
引用
收藏
页码:776 / 794
页数:32
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Efficacy and Safety of Ketamine-Dexmedetomidine Versus Ketamine-Propofol Combination for Periprocedural Sedation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Ahmed Saad Elsaeidy
    Aya Hisham Moussa Ahmad
    Neveen A. Kohaf
    Aya Aboutaleb
    Danisha Kumar
    Khaled Saad Elsaeidy
    Ola saeed Mohamed
    Alan D. Kaye
    Islam Mohammad Shehata
    Current Pain and Headache Reports, 2024, 28 : 211 - 227
  • [22] Safety and efficacy of bempedoic acid: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Ovidio De Filippo
    Fabrizio D’Ascenzo
    Mario Iannaccone
    Maurizio Bertaina
    Attilio Leone
    Irene Borzillo
    Emanuele Ravetti
    Andrea Solano
    Ilaria Pagliassotto
    Marco Nebiolo
    Francesco Bruno
    Federico Giacobbe
    Saverio Muscoli
    Silvia Monticone
    Maria Felice Brizzi
    Giuseppe Biondi Zoccai
    Gaetano Maria De Ferrari
    Cardiovascular Diabetology, 22
  • [23] Safety and efficacy of bempedoic acid: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    De Filippo, Ovidio
    D'Ascenzo, Fabrizio
    Iannaccone, Mario
    Bertaina, Maurizio
    Leone, Attilio
    Borzillo, Irene
    Ravetti, Emanuele
    Solano, Andrea
    Pagliassotto, Ilaria
    Nebiolo, Marco
    Bruno, Francesco
    Giacobbe, Federico
    Muscoli, Saverio
    Monticone, Silvia
    Brizzi, Maria Felice
    Zoccai, Giuseppe Biondi
    De Ferrari, Gaetano Maria
    CARDIOVASCULAR DIABETOLOGY, 2023, 22 (01)
  • [24] Efficacy and safety of perampanel in epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Lavu, Alekhya
    Aboulatta, Laila
    Abou-Setta, Ahmed M.
    Aloud, Basma
    Askin, Nicole
    Rabbani, Rasheda
    Shouman, Walid
    Zarychanski, Ryan
    Eltonsy, Sherif
    SEIZURE-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPILEPSY, 2022, 102 : 54 - 60
  • [25] Comparison of the recovery quality between remimazolam and propofol after general anesthesia: systematic review and a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Zhu, Caiyun
    Xie, Ran
    Qin, Fang
    Wang, Naiguo
    Tang, Hui
    PEERJ, 2024, 12
  • [26] Hemodynamic Influences of Remimazolam Versus Propofol During the Induction Period of General Anesthesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Peng, Xilin
    Liu, Congqi
    Zhu, Yihao
    Peng, Ling
    Zhang, Xueguang
    Wei, Wei
    Zhu, Tao
    PAIN PHYSICIAN, 2023, 26 (07) : E761 - E773
  • [27] The safety and efficacy of gabapentinoids in the management of neuropathic pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Meaadi, Jawza
    Obara, Ilona
    Eldabe, Sam
    Nazar, Hamde
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2023, 45 (03) : 556 - 565
  • [28] The safety and efficacy of gabapentinoids in the management of neuropathic pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Jawza Meaadi
    Ilona Obara
    Sam Eldabe
    Hamde Nazar
    International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 2023, 45 : 556 - 565
  • [29] The Efficacy and Safety of Telerehabilitation for Fibromyalgia: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Wu, Yong-Qiang
    Long, Yi
    Peng, Wei-Jie
    Gong, Cheng
    Liu, Yue-Quan
    Peng, Xu-Miao
    Zhong, Yan-Biao
    Luo, Yun
    Wang, Mao -Yuan
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2023, 25
  • [30] A meta-analysis and systematic review based on perioperative management of elderly patients: is ciprofol an alternative to propofol?
    Chen, Wei
    Xu, YuGuang
    Zeng, YaFei
    Xing, GuiPing
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2025, 81 (01) : 111 - 121