Efficacy and safety of ciprofol versus propofol for induction of general anaesthesia or sedation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

被引:2
|
作者
Saeed, Abdallah [1 ]
Elewidi, Mariam [1 ]
Nawlo, Ahmad [2 ]
Elzahaby, Amr [1 ]
Khaled, Asmaa [1 ]
Othman, Abdalla [1 ]
Abuelazm, Mohamed [1 ]
Abdelazeem, Basel [3 ]
机构
[1] Tanta Univ, Fac Med, El Bahr St, Tanta, Gharbia, Egypt
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Infect Dis, Boston, MA USA
[3] West Virginia Univ, Dept Cardiol, Morgantown, WV USA
关键词
Ciprofol; general anaesthesia; meta-analysis; pain; propofol; sedation; systematic review; PARALLEL-GROUP; SINGLE-BLIND; MULTICENTER; MAINTENANCE; PHASE-3;
D O I
10.4103/ija.ija_104_24
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background and Aims: Propofol has been used in medical practice as an anaesthetic drug for producing and sustaining general anaesthesia due to its advantages. However, it also has drawbacks, including injection-related discomfort. Recently, ciprofol has emerged as a promising anaesthetic drug that may overcome many drawbacks associated with propofol. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we assess the efficacy and safety of ciprofol compared to propofol in different anaesthesia procedures. Methods: The study protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (ID: CRD42023458170). Central, PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus and WOS were searched for English literature until 26 February 2024. Meta-analysis was performed using RevMan. The risk of bias was assessed using the RoB 2.0 tool. Results were reported as risk ratios (RRs), mean differences (MDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Nineteen randomised controlled trials were included in our analysis, with 2841 participants. There was no difference between ciprofol and propofol in the success rate of endoscopy (RR: 1.01, 95% CI: 0.99, 1.02; P = 0.44), while ciprofol showed a significant increase in the success rate of general anaesthesia/sedation (RR: 1.01, 95% CI: 1.00, 1.02; P = 0.04). Ciprofol showed significantly lower pain on injection (RR: 0.14, 95% CI: 0.09, 0.22; P < 0.001), lower adverse events (RR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.69, 0.92; P = 0.002) and higher patient satisfaction (standardised mean difference (SMD): 0.36, 95% CI: 0.24, 0.48; P < 0.001). Conclusion: Ciprofol exhibited a comparable efficacy to propofol in inducing general anaesthesia and sedation with fewer adverse events, less pain on injection and higher patient satisfaction. These collective findings may suggest that ciprofol can be used as an alternative drug to ensure effective general anaesthesia/sedation induction in the future.
引用
收藏
页码:776 / 794
页数:32
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Comparative effects of ciprofol and propofol on perioperative outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Qi, Jiazheng
    Zhang, Lingjing
    Meng, Fanhua
    Yang, Xiaoyu
    Chen, Baoxuan
    Gao, Lingqi
    Zhao, Xu
    Luo, Mengqiang
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2025, 75 (02):
  • [12] Incidence of respiratory depression between ciprofol and propofol after anesthesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zeng, Jinfang
    Cao, Qian
    Hong, Aonan
    Gu, Zhen
    Jian, Jinjin
    Liang, Xiao
    MEDICINE, 2024, 103 (41) : e40037
  • [13] Outcomes of dexmedetomidine versus propofol sedation in critically ill adults requiring mechanical ventilation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
    Heybati, Kiyan
    Zhou, Fangwen
    Ali, Saif
    Deng, Jiawen
    Mohananey, Divyanshu
    Villablanca, Pedro
    Ramakrishna, Harish
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2022, 129 (04) : 515 - 526
  • [14] Ciprofol versus propofol for adult sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ortegal, Guilherme H.
    Barbosa, Eduardo C.
    Faria, Pedro C.
    Couto, Joao, V
    Silva, Guilherme C.
    Souza, Marcio H.
    Ferreira, Lucas N.
    Moraes, Vitor R.
    Campos, Maria C.
    Campos, Luiza A.
    MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA, 2024, 90 (11) : 1013 - 1021
  • [15] Remimazolam versus propofol for procedural sedation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Chang, Yu
    Huang, Yun-Ting
    Chi, Kuan-Yu
    Huang, Yen-Ta
    PEERJ, 2023, 11
  • [16] Safety and efficacy of the combination of esketamine and propofol in procedural sedation/analgesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Huang, Xiaoci
    Lin, Fong
    Chen, Qi
    Hu, Xianwen
    MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA, 2023, 89 (7-8) : 680 - 689
  • [17] The Safety of Propofol Versus Sevoflurane for General Anesthesia in Children: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Zhao, Ying
    Qin, Feng
    Liu, Yuhang
    Dai, Yanping
    Cen, Xiaobo
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2022, 9
  • [18] Efficacy and Safety of Remimazolam Versus Etomidate for Induction of General Anesthesia: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Zhao, Li
    Guo, Yiping
    Zhou, Xuelei
    Mao, Wei
    Chen, Linlin
    Xie, Ying
    Li, Linji
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2024, 13
  • [19] Efficacy and safety of ciprofol versus propofol for anesthesia induction in adult patients received elective surgeries: a meta‑analysis
    Dilireba Ainiwaer
    Wanwei Jiang
    BMC Anesthesiology, 24
  • [20] Efficacy and Safety of Ketamine-Dexmedetomidine Versus Ketamine-Propofol Combination for Periprocedural Sedation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Elsaeidy, Ahmed Saad
    Ahmad, Aya Hisham Moussa
    Kohaf, Neveen A.
    Aboutaleb, Aya
    Kumar, Danisha
    Elsaeidy, Khaled Saad
    Mohamed, Ola saeed
    Kaye, Alan D.
    Shehata, Islam Mohammad
    CURRENT PAIN AND HEADACHE REPORTS, 2024, 28 (04) : 211 - 227