Does tillering affect the grain yield of maize (Zea mays)? A quantitative review

被引:0
作者
Rotili, Diego Hernan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Micheloud, Jose Roberto [1 ,4 ]
Ross, Fernando [5 ]
Abeledo, Leonor Gabriela [1 ,2 ]
Maddonni, Gustavo angel [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Buenos Aires, Fac Agron, Dept Prod Vegetal, Catedra Cerealicultura, Av San Martin 4453,C1417DSE, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[2] Univ Buenos Aires, Fac Agron, IFEVA, CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[3] America Agroinnova, America, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[4] PLEXAGRO, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[5] Inst Nacl Tecnol Agr INTA, Tres Arroyos, Argentina
关键词
agricultural production; grain yield; maize; marginal environments; quantitative review; tillering; yield per plant; Zea mays L; PLANT; HYBRIDS; CORN;
D O I
10.1071/CP24064
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Context. Tillering is generally considered counterproductive for grain yield in maize (Zea mays). However, recent research defies that idea and suggests that the effects of tillering on grain yield depend on the yield-environment. Aims. To synthesise the impact of tillering on maize grain yield across a wide range of environments. Methods. Literature regarding tillering in maize was assessed to create a multi-environment database of grain yield per unit area and per plant of side-by-side comparisons of grain yield of tillered versus de-tillered treatments. Regression analyses and mean comparisons were used to compare the performance of tillered and de-tillered crops. Key results. The maximum plant density in the database was 7 plants m(-2). Tillered crops out-yielded de-tillered crops irrespective of the de-tillered grain yield (y-intercept = 841 kg ha(-1), P < 0.01 and slope = 1, P = 0.91). For the lower tercile of yield-environments (i.e. lower than 5269 kg ha(-1)), the frequency of lower yields on tillered crops was higher (all database = 0.21, Pampas = 0.5) than in the mid or high terciles (all database < 0.13, Pampas < 0.18). Across environments, individual plant yield was higher for tillered crops (42 g plant(-1) or 16% difference), but that difference decreased as the de-tillered individual plant yield decreased turning into zero below 136 g plant(-1). Conclusions. Within the limitations of the data set, tillering was generally beneficial or indifferent for grain yield, but detrimental effects may be recorded in very low yield-environments. Implications. Tillering does not condition maize yield across most environments.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Tillering and nitrogen economy of low-density maize crops
    Alvarez, C. A. Mejia
    Rotili, D. H.
    D'Andrea, K. E.
    Ciampitti, I. A.
    Abeledo, L. G.
    Maddonni, G. A.
    [J]. FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2024, 309
  • [2] Optimal plant population and nitrogen fertility for dryland corn in western Nebraska
    Blumenthal, JM
    Lyon, DJ
    Stroup, WW
    [J]. AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2003, 95 (04) : 878 - 883
  • [3] Artificial selection for grain yield has increased net CO2 exchange of the ear leaf in maize crops
    Cagnola, Juan, I
    Parco, Martin
    Rotili, Diego H.
    Ploschuk, Edmundo L.
    Curin, Facundo
    Amas, Juan, I
    Luque, Sergio F.
    Maddonni, Gustavo A.
    Otegui, Maria E.
    Casal, Jorge J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2021, 72 (10) : 3902 - 3913
  • [4] Exploring the effect of tillers on the water economy, plant growth and kernel set of low-density maize crops
    Diego Hernan, Rotili
    Gabriela, Abeledo L.
    deVoil, Peter
    Daniel, Rodriguez
    Gustavo Angel, Maddonni
    [J]. AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2021, 243
  • [5] Duvick DN, 2005, MAYDICA, V50, P193
  • [6] RELATION OF TILLERS TO YIELD OF DENT CORN, (ZEA-MAYS L)
    EARLEY, EB
    SEIF, RD
    BENSLEY, FA
    [J]. AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1971, 63 (03) : 472 - &
  • [7] Yield improvement and yield components: A comparison of corn and soybean
    Egli, Dennis B.
    [J]. CROP SCIENCE, 2023, 63 (03) : 1019 - 1029
  • [8] Global maize production, consumption and trade: trends and R&D implications
    Erenstein, Olaf
    Jaleta, Moti
    Sonder, Kai
    Mottaleb, Khondoker
    Prasanna, B. M.
    [J]. FOOD SECURITY, 2022, 14 (05) : 1295 - 1319
  • [9] FAOSTAT, 2023, Food and agriculture organization of the united nations statistic. Emissions from Forest
  • [10] Ferrante A, 2015, P 17 ASA C 20 24 SEP