An analysis of the social, cultural, and ecological factors that affect the implementation of biosecurity measures on smallholder commercial swine farms in Italy in the context of an emerging African Swine Fever outbreak

被引:2
作者
Whitaker, Sarah H. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Mannelli, Alessandro [1 ]
Kitron, Uriel [2 ]
Bellini, Silvia [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Torino, Dept Vet Sci, Turin, Italy
[2] Emory Univ, Dept Environm Sci, Atlanta, GA USA
[3] Boise State Univ, Dept Anthropol, Hemingway Ctr Room 55, Boise, ID 83725 USA
[4] Expt Zooprophylact Inst Lombardy & Emilia Romagna, Brescia, Italy
关键词
African swine fever; Biosecurity; Commercial farms; Socio-economic factors; Mountains; CLIMATE-CHANGE; VIRUS INTRODUCTION; RISK-ASSESSMENT; EPIDEMIOLOGY; CATTLE; DETERMINANTS; TRANSMISSION; RELEVANT; DYNAMICS; DRIVERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.prevetmed.2024.106238
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
African Swine Fever (ASF) is a contagious viral disease that infects wild and domesticated swine. In early 2022, the virus was found in wild boar in the Apennine mountains of mainland Italy. 2 Since then, it has spread from wild boar to domesticated swine. To control the spread of ASF, an effective surveillance system and the implementation of strict biosecurity measures on farms are required yet are unevenly implemented across husbandry systems. Smallholder farms in particular are known to have low levels of biosecurity. In the Apennine mountains of Italy, small commercial farms have been found to have low levels of biosecurity despite being located in areas with high densities of wild boar, and, hence, being high-risk sites for potential ASF incursion and subsequent diffusion. To address the question as to why the level of biosecurity is low, interviews and participant observation were conducted with smallholder commercial farmers. The interviews identified the social, cultural, and ecological factors that affect the implementation of biosecurity measures in small commercial swine farms in the Apennines. Farmers expressed knowledge of priority biosecurity measures and an overall willingness to follow rules and regulations; however, the application of the measures in practice was uneven across farms. Economic, political, and ecological factors as well as farmer beliefs about biosecurity emerged as important factors affecting the implementation of biosecurity measures. These include economic constraints, challenges posed by the mountain environment, a shifting regulatory environment, and ideas about animal welfare. Other important factors include cultural factors such as the use of traditional agricultural methods and norms about customer access to animals, time constraints and the perceived hassle of implementing the measures, farmer age, farmer relationships with government officials and veterinarians, and the role of pigs in reducing farm waste. The study confirmed that wild boar are present in high numbers and in close proximity to smallholder commercial farms in the Apennines.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 85 条
  • [1] Prevention and Control of African Swine Fever in the Smallholder Pig Value Chain in Northern Uganda: Thematic Analysis of Stakeholders' Perceptions
    Aliro, T.
    Chenais, E.
    Odongo, W.
    Okello, D. M.
    Masembe, C.
    Stahl, K.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2022, 8
  • [2] Research gap analysis on African swine fever
    Alvarez, Julio
    Bicout, Dominique
    Boklund, Anette
    Butner, Anette
    Depner, Klaus
    More, Simon J.
    Roberts, Helen
    Stahl, Karl
    Thulke, Hans-Hermann
    Viltrop, Arvo
    Antoniou, Sotiria-Eleni
    Abrahantes, Jose Cortinas
    Dhollander, Sofie
    Gogin, Andrey
    Papanikolaou, Alexandra
    Van der Stede, Yves
    Villeta, Laura C. Gonzalez
    Schmidt, Christian Gortazar
    [J]. EFSA JOURNAL, 2019, 17 (08)
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2020, The social ecological model: A framework for intervention
  • [4] Diverging Discourses: Animal Health Challenges and Veterinary Care in Northern Uganda
    Arvidsson, Anna
    Fischer, Klara
    Hansen, Kjell
    Sternberg-Lewerin, Susanna
    Chenais, Erika
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE, 2022, 9
  • [5] Practising co-production and interdisciplinarity: Challenges and implications for one health research
    Barnett, Tony
    Pfeiffer, Dirk Udo
    Hoque, Md Ahasanul
    Giasuddin, Mohammad
    Flora, Meerjady Sabrina
    Biswas, Paritosh Kumar
    Debnath, Nitish
    Fournie, Guillaume
    [J]. PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2020, 177
  • [6] A Review of Risk Factors of African Swine Fever Incursion in Pig Farming within the European Union Scenario
    Bellini, Silvia
    Casadei, Gabriele
    De Lorenzi, Giorgia
    Tamba, Marco
    [J]. PATHOGENS, 2021, 10 (01): : 1 - 15
  • [7] Attitudes towards biosecurity practices relevant to Johne's disease control on beef cattle farms
    Benjamin, L. A.
    Fosgate, G. T.
    Ward, M. P.
    Roussel, A. J.
    Feagin, R. A.
    Schwartz, A. L.
    [J]. PREVENTIVE VETERINARY MEDICINE, 2010, 94 (3-4) : 222 - 230
  • [8] African swine fever EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW)
    Berg, Charlotte
    Botner, Anette
    Browman, Howard
    De Koeijer, Aline
    Domingo, Mariano
    Ducrot, Christian
    Edwards, Sandra
    Fourichon, Christine
    Koenen, Frank
    More, Simon
    Raj, Mohan
    Sihvonen, Liisa
    Spoolder, Hans
    Stegeman, Jan Arend
    Thulke, Hans-Hermann
    Vagsholm, Ivar
    Velarde, Antonio
    Willeberg, Preben
    [J]. EFSA JOURNAL, 2015, 13 (07)
  • [9] Berkes F., 1998, Linking Social and Ecological Systems. Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience
  • [10] Berkes F., 2008, Navigating socialecological systems: Building resilience for complexity and change, DOI [10.1017/CBO9780511541957, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511541957]