Gingival fibroblast response to (hybrid) ceramic implant reconstruction surfaces is modulated by biomaterial type and surface treatment

被引:2
作者
Rabel, Kerstin [1 ,5 ]
Blankenburg, Andrea [1 ]
Steinberg, Thorsten [2 ]
Kohal, Ralf J. [1 ]
Spies, Benedikt C. [1 ]
Adolfsson, Erik [3 ]
Witkowski, Siegbert [1 ]
Altmann, Brigitte [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Freiburg, Fac Med, Dept Prosthet Dent,Ctr Dent Med, Med Ctr, Hugstetterstr 55, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany
[2] Univ Freiburg, Med Ctr, Fac Med, Ctr Dent Med,Div Oral Biotechnol, Hugstetterstr 55, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany
[3] RISE Res Inst Sweden, Div Mat & Prod, Argongatan 30, S-43153 Molndal, Sweden
[4] Univ Freiburg, Fac Med, GERN Res Ctr Tissue Replacement Regenerat & Neogen, Ctr Dent Med,Dept Prosthet Dent,Med Ctr, Engesserstr 4, D-79108 Freiburg, Germany
[5] Univ Freiburg, Ctr Dent Med, Med Ctr, Dept Prosthet Dent, Hugstetterstr 55, D-79106 Freiburg, Germany
关键词
CAD/CAM; Ceramics; Dental implant; Gingival fibroblast; Soft tissue integration; Zirconium dioxide; Lithium disilicate; Hybrid ceramic; SOFT-TISSUE INTEGRATION; NETWORK PICN MATERIALS; LITHIUM DISILICATE; TOPOGRAPHY; ATTACHMENT; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; PROLIFERATION; ABUTMENTS; ZIRCONIA; OSTEOBLAST;
D O I
10.1016/j.dental.2024.02.018
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: Surface characteristics of implant reconstructions determine the gingival fibroblast (GF) response and thus soft tissue integration (STI). However, for monolithic implant reconstructions it is unknown whether the (hybrid) ceramic biomaterial type and its surface treatment affect GF response. Therefore, this investigation examined the influence of the implant reconstruction biomaterials hybrid ceramic (HC), lithium disilicate ceramic (LS), 4 and 5 mol% yttria partially stabilized zirconiumdioxide ceramics (4/5Y-PSZ) and their surface treatment - machining, polishing or glazing - on surface characteristics and GF response. Methods: After characterization of surface topography and wettability by scanning electron microscopy, interferometry and contact angle measurement, the adhesion, morphology, metabolic activity and proliferation of GFs from six donors was investigated by fluorescent staining and a resazurin-based assay at days 1, 3 and 7. Titanium (Ti) served as control. Results: Biomaterial type and surface treatment affected the GF response in a topography-dependent manner. Smooth polished and glazed surfaces demonstrated enhanced GF adhesion and earlier proliferation onset compared to rough machined surfaces. Due to minor differences in surface topography of polished and glazed surfaces, however, the GF response was similar for polished and glazed HC, LS, 4- and 5Y-PSZ as well as Ti. Significance: Within the limits of the present investigation, polishing and glazing of machined HC, LS and 4/5YPSZ can be recommended to support STI-relevant cell functions in GF. Since the GF response on polished and glazed HC, LS, 4- and 5Y-PSZ surfaces and the Ti control was comparable, this investigation proofed equal cytocompatibility of these surfaces in vitro.
引用
收藏
页码:689 / 699
页数:11
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] The mucosal attachment at different abutments - An experimental study in dogs
    Abrahamsson, I
    Berglundh, T
    Glantz, PO
    Lindhe, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 1998, 25 (09) : 721 - 727
  • [2] Assessment of Novel Long-Lasting Ceria-Stabilized Zirconia-Based Ceramics with Different Surface Topographies as Implant Materials
    Altmann, Brigitte
    Karygianni, Lamprini
    Al-Ahmad, Ali
    Butz, Frank
    Baechle, Maria
    Adolfsson, Erik
    Fuerderer, Tobias
    Courtois, Nicolas
    Palmero, Paola
    Follo, Marie
    Chevalier, Jerome
    Steinberg, Thorsten
    Kohal, Ralf Joachim
    [J]. ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS, 2017, 27 (40)
  • [3] Osteoblast adhesion on biomaterials
    Anselme, K
    [J]. BIOMATERIALS, 2000, 21 (07) : 667 - 681
  • [4] Relative influence of surface topography and surface chemistry on cell response to bone implant materials. Part 2: biological aspects
    Anselme, K.
    Ponche, A.
    Bigerelle, M.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART H-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE, 2010, 224 (H12) : 1487 - 1507
  • [5] In vitro cytotoxic response to lithium disilicate dental ceramics
    Brackett, Martha Goel
    Lockwood, Petra E.
    Messer, Regina L. W.
    Lewis, Jill B.
    Bouillaguet, Serge
    Wataha, John C.
    [J]. DENTAL MATERIALS, 2008, 24 (04) : 450 - 456
  • [6] Soft tissue adhesion of polished versus glazed lithium disilicate ceramic for dental applications
    Brunot-Gohin, C.
    Duval, J-L.
    Azogui, E. -E.
    Jannetta, R.
    Pezron, I.
    Laurent-Maquin, D.
    Gangloff, S. C.
    Egles, C.
    [J]. DENTAL MATERIALS, 2013, 29 (09) : E205 - E212
  • [7] Biocompatibility study of lithium disilicate and zirconium oxide ceramics for esthetic dental abutments
    Brunot-Gohin, Celine
    Duval, Jean-Luc
    Verbeke, Sandra
    Belanger, Kayla
    Pezron, Isabelle
    Kugel, Gerard
    Laurent-Maquin, Dominique
    Gangloff, Sophie
    Egles, Christophe
    [J]. Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science, 2016, 46 (06) : 362 - 371
  • [8] Monolithic Ceramics: Effect of Finishing Techniques on Surface Properties, Bacterial Adhesion and Cell Viability
    Dal Piva, A. M. O.
    Contreras, L. P. C.
    Ribeiro, F. C.
    Anami, L. C.
    Camargo, S. E. A.
    Jorge, A. O. C.
    Bottino, M. A.
    [J]. OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 2018, 43 (03) : 315 - 325
  • [9] Can sterilization methods influence surface properties of resin composites? A purpose for previewing bias in laboratory bacterial adhesion tests
    de Sousa-Lima, Rodolfo Xavier
    de Sousa Santos, Kaiza
    de Azevedo Silva, Lucas Jose
    de Freitas Chaves, Leticia Virginia
    Alonso, Roberta Caroline Brushi
    Borges, Boniek Castillo Dutra
    [J]. MICROSCOPY RESEARCH AND TECHNIQUE, 2022, 85 (03) : 1101 - 1107
  • [10] Dike LE, 1999, IN VITRO CELL DEV-AN, V35, P441