Hierarchical co-optimization of EV scheduling considering customer and system in distribution networks

被引:3
作者
Cha, Junsang [1 ]
Han, Changhee [2 ]
Song, Sungyoon [3 ]
Kang, Sungwoo [1 ]
Lee, Dongwon [1 ]
Chang, Minhyeok [1 ]
Jang, Gilsoo [1 ]
机构
[1] Korea Univ, Sch Elect Engn, 145 Anam Ro, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Gyeongsang Natl Univ, Dept Elect Engn, Jinju 52828, Gyeongsangnamdo, South Korea
[3] Korea Electrotechnol Res Inst, Uiwang 16029, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
AUGMECON; Electrical vehicle scheduling; Multi-objective optimization; Optimal power flow; Second-order cone programming; Vehicle-to-grid; VEHICLE CHARGING STATIONS; MANAGEMENT; STRATEGY; MODEL; FLOW;
D O I
10.1016/j.segan.2024.101361
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The global surge in the adoption of electric vehicles (EV) has affected distribution networks, with uncoordinated charging increasing peak load and loss. EV scheduling has the potential to become a business that utilizes vehicle-to-grid (V2G) technology to mitigate system impacts while providing financial incentives to customers. Efficient EV scheduling is a multi-objective optimization problem that simultaneously considers network and customer perspectives for co-optimization. This study introduces a hierarchical EV charging management platform (EVMP) with day-ahead and real-time stages that satisfy customer preferences while ensuring efficient system operation. In this process, in order to solve the computational issues of the optimal power flow (OPF) problem, including integer variables, the computational burden was alleviated by removing integer variables from the OPF problem of the day-ahead stage, and EV dynamics were effectively handled using the rolling-horizon framework in the real-time stage. This study focuses on the relationships between the objective functions at each stage and utilizes the augmented epsilon-constraint method (AUGMECON) to obtain a Pareto front that assists in stakeholder decision making. The Pareto front is constructed by considering stakeholders from both two- and three-way perspectives, allowing the system operator to select a solution from the Pareto front for decision making.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Multi-objective electricity market clearing considering dynamic security by lexicographic optimization and augmented epsilon constraint method [J].
Aghaei, J. ;
Amjady, N. ;
Shayanfar, H. A. .
APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2011, 11 (04) :3846-3858
[2]   Optimal Net Load Flattening in Unbalanced Distribution Systems via Rank-Penalized Semidefinite Programming [J].
Alsaleh, Ibrahim ;
Alafnan, Hamoud ;
Alassaf, Abdullah ;
Almunif, Anas .
IEEE ACCESS, 2023, 11 :46308-46319
[3]   Multi-objective optimum charging management of electric vehicles through battery swapping stations [J].
Amiri, Saeed Salimi ;
Jadid, Shahram ;
Saboori, Hedayat .
ENERGY, 2018, 165 :549-562
[4]   Influences of vehicle to grid (V2G) on power grid: An analysis by considering associated stochastic parameters explicitly [J].
Bibak, Bijan ;
Tekiner-Mogulkoc, Hatice .
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY GRIDS & NETWORKS, 2021, 26
[5]   A rolling-horizon optimization algorithm for the long term operational scheduling of cogeneration systems [J].
Bischi, Aldo ;
Taccari, Leonardo ;
Martelli, Emanuele ;
Amaldi, Edoardo ;
Manzolini, Giampaolo ;
Silva, Paolo ;
Campanari, Stefano ;
Macchi, Ennio .
ENERGY, 2019, 184 :73-90
[6]  
Blink charging co, ABOUT US
[7]   An Optimized EV Charging Model Considering TOU Price and SOC Curve [J].
Cao, Yijia ;
Tang, Shengwei ;
Li, Canbing ;
Zhang, Peng ;
Tan, Yi ;
Zhang, Zhikun ;
Li, Junxiong .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID, 2012, 3 (01) :388-393
[8]   A Comprehensive Centralized Approach for Voltage Constraints Management in Active Distribution Grid [J].
Capitanescu, Florin ;
Bilibin, Ilya ;
Romero Ramos, Esther .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2014, 29 (02) :933-942
[9]   Branch Flow Model: Relaxations and Convexification-Part I [J].
Farivar, Masoud ;
Low, Steven H. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2013, 28 (03) :2554-2564
[10]   Willing to participate in vehicle-to-grid (V2G)? Why not! [J].
Geske, Joachim ;
Schumann, Diana .
ENERGY POLICY, 2018, 120 :392-401