Inpatient outcomes of mechanical circulatory support devices and heart transplantation in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

被引:0
|
作者
Hussain, Bilal [1 ]
Tarabanis, Constantine [2 ]
Aslam, Mian Muhammad Salman [3 ]
Dhulipala, Vishal [4 ]
Devarakonda, Pradeepkumar [4 ]
Maqsood, Haisum [5 ]
Moreno, Pedro [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cincinnati, Div Cardiovasc Hlth & Dis, Cincinnati, OH 45221 USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Cardiovasc Med, Boston, MA USA
[3] Univ Louisville, Louisville, KY USA
[4] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Div Cardiovasc Med, New York, NY USA
[5] Houston Methodist, Div Cardiovasc Med, Houston, TX USA
关键词
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy; Mechanical circulatory support devices; Left ventricular assist device (LVAD); Heart transplantation; Percutaneous ventricular assist device (Impella); Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO);
D O I
10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132396
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: The pathophysiology of HCM presents unique challenges for the management of cardiogenic shock and the use of mechanical circulatory support devices (MCSD). However, outcomes investigations for MCSD and HT in HCM patients is limited to case reports. The present study investigated MCSD and HT outcomes in HCM patients in a large retrospective cohort. Methods: The National Inpatient Sample (2016-2019) was used for the retrospective analysis of patients hospitalized for MCSD and HT using ICD-10 codes. Patients with implantation of more than one device category were excluded. These patients were divided into two cohorts, with and without HCM, and compared in terms of in-hospital mortality, trends in mortality rates, hospitalization costs and mean length of stay. Results: Among 267,780 patients hospitalized for MCSD and HT, 1155 patients had underlying HCM. Underlying HCM was associated with increased odds of mortality in patients receiving left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) (OR 3.4, 95% CI 1.03-11.2, p = 0.04) and temporary MCSD (OR 2.5, CI 1.8-3.6, p < 0.001). HCM was not associated with increased mortality in patients hospitalized for HT (OR 0.67, CI 0.15-2.85, p = 0.6). Patients with HCM undergoing MCSD and HT had a longer mean length of stay (22.1 vs 13.2 days, p = 0.004), and higher mean hospitalization charges ($830,103 vs $460,383, p < 0.0001) as compared to non-HCM patients. Conclusion: Underlying HCM is associated with increased in-hospital mortality in patients undergoing LVAD and temporary MCSD placement. Further prospective studies are required to expand our understanding of prognosis among HCM patients undergoing MCSD and establish management guidelines.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Use of mechanical circulatory support devices in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients as a bridge to cardiac transplantation.
    Gagermeier, JP
    Lawless, CE
    Malinowska, K
    CIRCULATION, 2001, 104 (17) : 556 - 556
  • [2] Mechanical Circulatory Support Device Utilization and Heart Transplant Waitlist Outcomes in Patients With Restrictive and Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
    Sridharan, Lakshmi
    Wayda, Brian
    Truby, Lauren K.
    Latif, Farhana
    Restaino, Susan
    Takeda, Koji
    Takayama, Hiroo
    Naka, Yoshifumi
    Colombo, Paolo C.
    Maurer, Mathew
    Farr, Maryjane A.
    Topkara, Veli K.
    CIRCULATION-HEART FAILURE, 2018, 11 (03) : e004665
  • [3] Effect of mechanical circulatory support on outcomes after heart transplantation
    Drakos, SG
    Kfoury, AG
    Long, JW
    Stringham, JC
    Gilbert, EM
    Moore, SA
    Campbell, BK
    Nelson, KE
    Horne, BD
    Renlund, DG
    JOURNAL OF HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION, 2006, 25 (01): : 22 - 28
  • [4] The impact of mechanical circulatory support on outcomes in paediatric heart transplantation
    Botha, Phil
    Solana, Ruth
    Cassidy, Jane
    Parry, Gareth
    Kirk, Richard
    Hasan, Asif
    Griselli, Massimo
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2013, 44 (05) : 836 - 840
  • [5] Heart transplantation and mechanical circulatory support
    Yadava, Om Prakash
    Rao, Vivek
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2020, 36 (SUPPL 2) : 299 - 300
  • [6] Heart transplantation and mechanical circulatory support
    Om Prakash Yadava
    Vivek Rao
    Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2020, 36 : 299 - 300
  • [7] OUTCOMES OF MECHANICAL CIRCULATORY SUPPORT IMPLANTATION IN HEART TRANSPLANTATION WAITING LIST
    Simonenko, Maria
    Fedotov, Petr
    Sazonova, Yulia
    Rubinchik, Vadim
    Pervunina, Tatiana
    Bautin, Andrei
    Marichev, Alexander
    Sitnikova, Maria
    Nikolaev, German
    Gordeev, Mikhail
    Karpenko, Mikhail
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 32 : 55 - 55
  • [8] Modern Outcomes of Mechanical Circulatory Support as a Bridge to Pediatric Heart Transplantation
    Wehman, Brody
    Stafford, Kristen A.
    Bittle, Gregory J.
    Kon, Zachary N.
    Evans, Charles F.
    Rajagopal, Keshava
    Pietris, Nicholas
    Kaushal, Sunjay
    Griffith, Bartley P.
    ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2016, 101 (06): : 2321 - 2328
  • [9] Modern Outcomes of Mechanical Circulatory Support as a Bridge to Pediatric Heart Transplantation
    Wehman, Brody
    Stafford, Kristen
    Bittle, Gregory
    Kon, Zachary N.
    Watkins, Amelia C.
    Pietris, Nicholas
    Siddiqui, Osama T.
    Rajagopal, Keshava
    Si Pham
    Kaushal, Sunjay
    Griffith, Bartley P.
    CIRCULATION, 2014, 130
  • [10] Mechanical circulatory support: devices, outcomes and complications
    Carmelo A. Milano
    Alan A. Simeone
    Heart Failure Reviews, 2013, 18 : 35 - 53