Industrial CO2 transport in Germany: Comparison of pipeline routing scenarios

被引:1
作者
Yeates, Christopher [1 ]
Abdelshafy, Ali [2 ]
Schmidt-Hattenberger, Cornelia [1 ]
Walther, Grit [2 ]
机构
[1] Helmholtz Ctr Potsdam, GFZ German Res Ctr Geosci, D-14473 Potsdam, Germany
[2] Rhein Westfal TH Aachen, Chair Operat Management, D-52068 Aachen, Germany
关键词
Carbon neutrality; Energy transition; Carbon capture and storage; CO; 2; infrastructure; Heuristic optimization; Scenario analysis; CARBON CAPTURE; CCS TRANSPORT; STORAGE; INFRASTRUCTURE; OPTIMIZATION; CHALLENGES; DEPLOYMENT; NETWORKS; DESIGN; SCALE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijggc.2024.104225
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Carbon capture and storage will be necessary for some industries to reach carbon neutrality. One of the main associated challenges is the design of the network linking the CO2 sources to the storage sites. Establishing a CO2 network can be impacted by many uncertainties such as CO2 amounts, pipeline routes and the locations of emitters and carbon sinks. We present a framework to investigate different scenarios of a future CO2 network in Germany. The analyses compare the routes and associated costs of different scenarios. The developed model uses several geospatial datasets and an optimization scheme to yield realistic and cost-efficient outcomes. Parameters such as population density and existing infrastructure are integrated to calculate potential routes, which are then used as an input for the developed heuristic model to determine the optimum network. The derived framework is flexible and can be used for investigating other scenarios, regions and settings. The results show that the different scenarios have a profound impact on the optimal layout and costs. The investment costs of the investigated scenarios range between 1.3 and 3 billion EUR. The outcomes are important for academia, industry and policymaking for the ongoing discussions regarding the development of carbon infrastructure.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 75 条
[31]  
IEA, 2009, Upgraded calculator for CO2 pipeline systems (technical study)
[32]  
IMO, 2006, 1996 PROT CONV PREV
[33]  
International Energy Agency (IEA), 2024, CO2 transport and storage
[34]   Detailed spatial modeling of carbon capture and storage (CCS) infrastructure deployment in the southwestern United States [J].
Johnson, Nils ;
Ogden, Joan .
10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, 2011, 4 :2693-2699
[35]  
Kearns D., 2021, Technology Readiness and Costs of CCS
[36]   How Storage Uncertainty Will Drive CCS Infrastructure [J].
Keating, Gordon N. ;
Middleton, Richard S. ;
Viswanathan, Hari S. ;
Stauffer, Philip H. ;
Pawar, Rajesh J. .
10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, 2011, 4 :2393-2400
[37]   Establishing an integrated CCS transport infrastructure in northern Europe - challenges and possibilities [J].
Kjarstad, Jan ;
Ramdani, Ricky ;
Gomes, Pedro M. ;
Rootzen, Johan ;
Johnsson, Filip .
10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL TECHNOLOGIES, 2011, 4 :2417-2424
[38]  
Knoope M., 2015, Costs, safety and uncertainties of CO2 infrastructure development
[39]   Economic optimization of CO2 pipeline configurations [J].
Knoope, M. M. J. ;
Ramirez, A. ;
Faaij, A. P. C. .
GHGT-11, 2013, 37 :3105-3112
[40]   Optimal Spatial Deployment of CO2 Capture and Storage Given a Price on Carbon [J].
Kuby, Michael J. ;
Bielicki, Jeffrey M. ;
Middleton, Richard S. .
INTERNATIONAL REGIONAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2011, 34 (03) :285-305