Psychometric properties of the DSM-5 Panic Disorder Dimensional Scale in an Australian community sample

被引:0
作者
Plunkett, Siobhan [1 ]
Wootton, Bethany M. [2 ]
Moses, Karen [1 ]
机构
[1] Western Sydney Univ, Sch Psychol, Penrith, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Technol Sydney, Grad Sch Hlth, Discipline Psychol, Ultimo, NSW, Australia
关键词
Dimensional Scale; DSM-5; panic disorder; PD-D; psychometric properties; self-report; ANXIETY DISORDERS; SEPARATION ANXIETY; MENTAL-HEALTH; FIT INDEXES; RELIABILITY; SENSITIVITY; EPIDEMIOLOGY; RISK;
D O I
10.1080/00050067.2024.2357280
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Objective: The Panic Disorder Dimensional Scale (PD-D) was developed to provide a dimensional rating of panic disorder (PD) symptom severity alongside the traditional categorical Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) diagnosis. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the PD-D in an Australian community sample. Method: Two-hundred and eighty-eight participants (72.9% female) aged 18-76 years (M = 28.28; SD = 12.08) completed the study. Results: Confirmatory factor analysis indicated that PD-D demonstrates a unidimensional factor (comparative fit index [CFI] = 0.95; Tucker-Lewis index (TLI) = 0.94; standardised root mean square residual [SRMR] = 0.04). The scale also demonstrated excellent internal consistency [alpha = .96 (95% CI: .95-.97); omega = 0.96 (95% CI: .95-.97)], and evidence of convergent and divergent validity. A good test-retest reliability was evident for the total PD-D score (ICC = .76, p < .001). Conclusions: The PD-D appears to be a reliable and valid measure which can be used to support diagnosis of PD in Australia. Limitations are discussed, including the use of a predominantly female sample and lack of clinician-informed data regarding current diagnoses.
引用
收藏
页码:152 / 161
页数:10
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [1] Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2021, Education and Work
  • [2] Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2022, NATL SURVEY MENTAL H
  • [3] Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2021, Cultural diversity: Census
  • [4] The Nature, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Neuroticism: Back to the Future
    Barlow, David H.
    Sauer-Zavala, Shannon
    Carl, Jenna R.
    Bullis, Jacqueline R.
    Ellard, Kristen K.
    [J]. CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2014, 2 (03) : 344 - 365
  • [5] Quality of life impairment in generalized anxiety disorder, social phobia, and panic disorder
    Barrera, Terri L.
    Norton, Peter J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANXIETY DISORDERS, 2009, 23 (08) : 1086 - 1090
  • [6] PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF THE DIMENSIONAL ANXIETY SCALES FOR DSM-V IN AN UNSELECTED SAMPLE OF GERMAN TREATMENT SEEKING PATIENTS
    Beesdo-Baum, Katja
    Klotsche, Jens
    Knappe, Susanne
    Craske, Michelle G.
    LeBeau, Richard T.
    Hoyer, Juergen
    Strobel, Anja
    Pieper, Lars
    Wittchen, Hans-Ulrich
    [J]. DEPRESSION AND ANXIETY, 2012, 29 (12) : 1014 - 1024
  • [7] Psychometric properties of the DSM-5 social anxiety disorder dimensional scale in an Australian community sample
    Binasis, Theodora
    Groves, David
    Wootton, Bethany M.
    Moses, Karen
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 78 (05) : 938 - 950
  • [8] Calculating sample size for reliability studies
    Borg, David N.
    Bach, Aaron J. E.
    O'Brien, Julia L.
    Sainani, Kristin L.
    [J]. PM&R, 2022, 14 (08) : 1018 - 1025
  • [9] Brown TA., 2006, Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research
  • [10] Byrne B, 2010, INTERNATIONAL HANDBOOK OF PSYCHOLOGY IN EDUCATION, P3