The comparison study of laminectomy with unilateral and bilateral pedicle screws fixation and laminectomy alone without fusion interbody in young patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: A randomized clinical trial

被引:0
|
作者
Hajilo, Parisa [1 ]
Imani, Behzad [2 ]
Zandi, Shirdel
Mehrafshan, Ali [3 ]
Khazaei, Salman [4 ]
机构
[1] Hamadan Univ Med Sci, Student Res Comm, Hamadan, Iran
[2] Hamadan Univ Med Sci, Sch Paramed, Dept Operating Room, Hamadan, Iran
[3] Univ Med Sciense Qom, Dept Neurosurg, Nekuii Forghani Hosp, Qom, Iran
[4] Hamadan Univ Med Sci, Hamadan, Iran
关键词
tabilization; Spine; Unilateral; Bilateral; Spinal stenosis; Lumbar; BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; DEGENERATION; SURGERY; CAGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35435
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: There are many reports about the risk factors for recurrence after laminectomy surgery. Some surgeons use unilateral and bilateral fusion to provide sufficient stability to the lumbar spine. However, its strength, safety, and effectiveness in young patients are not widely known. Therefore, this study was conducted to compare surgical methods of laminectomy with unilateral and bilateral fixation and laminectomy alone without interbody fusion in young patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Methods: 90 patients eligible for lumbar spinal stenosis surgery were selected through convenience sampling and randomly divided into three groups: laminectomy without fixation (A), laminectomy with unilateral fixation (B), and bilateral fixation (C). Pain, functional disability, quality of life, recurrent disc, adjacent segment disease (ASD), and fusion rate were evaluated and compared among the three groups six months post-surgery. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 16. Results: Six months after surgery, the mean score of functional disability in the bilateral group was significantly higher than the other groups (12.92 (3.30) vs 5.52 (1.91) and 4.30 (1.84), P < 0.05). Also, the highest mean score of pain after surgery was observed in the bilateral group (4.33 (0.70) vs 1.81(0.68) and 1.63(0.56), P < 0.05). The mean score of quality of life in the unilateral group was significantly higher than the other groups (87.81 (5.67) vs 68.58 (3.08) and 56.07 (4.04), P < 0.05). No significant difference was observed between the groups (P > 0.05) regarding fusion, recurrent disc herniation, and adjacent segment disease. Conclusions: Unilateral fixation provides the same benefits as bilateral fixation but has the additional benefits of being less invasive and minimizing the disadvantages of other investigated techniques during and after surgery.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Unilateral versus Bilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation Combined with Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Low Lumbar Degenerative Disc Diseases: Analysis of Clinical and Radiographic Results
    Chen, De-jian
    Yao, Cong
    Song, Quanwei
    Tang, Benyu
    Liu, Xuqiang
    Zhang, Bin
    Dai, Min
    Nie, Tao
    Wan, Zongmiao
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 115 : E516 - E522
  • [32] Clinical outcomes and safety assessment in elderly patients undergoing decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective study
    Asgeir S Jakola
    Andreas Sørlie
    Sasha Gulati
    Øystein P Nygaard
    Stian Lydersen
    Tore Solberg
    BMC Surgery, 10
  • [33] A Comparison of the Clinical Outcomes of Decompression Alone and Fusion in Elderly Patients with Two-Level or More Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    Son, Seong
    Kim, Woo Kyung
    Lee, Sang Gu
    Park, Chan Woo
    Lee, Keun
    JOURNAL OF KOREAN NEUROSURGICAL SOCIETY, 2013, 53 (01) : 19 - 25
  • [34] Decompression alone or decompression with fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis: fiveyear clinical results from a randomized clinical trial
    Karlsson, T.
    Forsth, P.
    Ohagen, P.
    Michaelsson, K.
    Sanden, B.
    BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2024, 106B (07) : 705 - 712
  • [35] Biomechanical Comparison of Stand-Alone and Bilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation for Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery-A Finite Element Analysis
    Fang, Guofang
    Lin, Yunzhi
    Wu, Jiachang
    Cui, Wengang
    Zhang, Shihao
    Guo, Lili
    Sang, Hongxun
    Huang, Wenghua
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 141 : E204 - E212
  • [36] Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF): a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Wang, Liang
    Wang, Yipeng
    Li, Zhengyao
    Yu, Bin
    Li, Ye
    BMC SURGERY, 2014, 14
  • [37] Unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF): a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Liang Wang
    Yipeng Wang
    Zhengyao Li
    Bin Yu
    Ye Li
    BMC Surgery, 14
  • [38] Comparison of Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes in Patients Receiving Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Removal of Unilateral or Bilateral Facet Joints
    Tye, Erik Y.
    Alentado, Vincent J.
    Mroz, Thomas E.
    Orr, R. Douglas
    Steinmetz, Michael P.
    SPINE, 2016, 41 (17) : E1039 - E1045
  • [39] Innovative Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Degenerative Instability: A Non-Randomized Clinical Trial
    Yin, Peng
    Ding, Yi
    Zhou, Lijin
    Xu, Chunyang
    Gao, Haifeng
    Pang, Daming
    Hai, Yong
    Yang, Jincai
    JOURNAL OF PAIN RESEARCH, 2021, 14 : 3685 - 3693
  • [40] A single-arm retrospective study of the clinical efficacy of unilateral biportal endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis
    Wang, Xiangbin
    Tian, Zheng
    Mansuerjiang, Maiwulan
    Younusi, Aikebaier
    Xu, Leilei
    Xiang, Haibin
    Cao, Li
    Wang, Chong
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2023, 9