The comparison study of laminectomy with unilateral and bilateral pedicle screws fixation and laminectomy alone without fusion interbody in young patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: A randomized clinical trial

被引:0
|
作者
Hajilo, Parisa [1 ]
Imani, Behzad [2 ]
Zandi, Shirdel
Mehrafshan, Ali [3 ]
Khazaei, Salman [4 ]
机构
[1] Hamadan Univ Med Sci, Student Res Comm, Hamadan, Iran
[2] Hamadan Univ Med Sci, Sch Paramed, Dept Operating Room, Hamadan, Iran
[3] Univ Med Sciense Qom, Dept Neurosurg, Nekuii Forghani Hosp, Qom, Iran
[4] Hamadan Univ Med Sci, Hamadan, Iran
关键词
tabilization; Spine; Unilateral; Bilateral; Spinal stenosis; Lumbar; BIOMECHANICAL ANALYSIS; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; DEGENERATION; SURGERY; CAGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35435
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background: There are many reports about the risk factors for recurrence after laminectomy surgery. Some surgeons use unilateral and bilateral fusion to provide sufficient stability to the lumbar spine. However, its strength, safety, and effectiveness in young patients are not widely known. Therefore, this study was conducted to compare surgical methods of laminectomy with unilateral and bilateral fixation and laminectomy alone without interbody fusion in young patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. Methods: 90 patients eligible for lumbar spinal stenosis surgery were selected through convenience sampling and randomly divided into three groups: laminectomy without fixation (A), laminectomy with unilateral fixation (B), and bilateral fixation (C). Pain, functional disability, quality of life, recurrent disc, adjacent segment disease (ASD), and fusion rate were evaluated and compared among the three groups six months post-surgery. The data were analyzed using SPSS version 16. Results: Six months after surgery, the mean score of functional disability in the bilateral group was significantly higher than the other groups (12.92 (3.30) vs 5.52 (1.91) and 4.30 (1.84), P < 0.05). Also, the highest mean score of pain after surgery was observed in the bilateral group (4.33 (0.70) vs 1.81(0.68) and 1.63(0.56), P < 0.05). The mean score of quality of life in the unilateral group was significantly higher than the other groups (87.81 (5.67) vs 68.58 (3.08) and 56.07 (4.04), P < 0.05). No significant difference was observed between the groups (P > 0.05) regarding fusion, recurrent disc herniation, and adjacent segment disease. Conclusions: Unilateral fixation provides the same benefits as bilateral fixation but has the additional benefits of being less invasive and minimizing the disadvantages of other investigated techniques during and after surgery.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Clinical outcomes and cost analysis for unilateral versus bilateral pedicle screw fixation in two levels during minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF): a comparative analysis
    Han, Kang
    Gao, Quanyou
    Gao, Haoran
    Lu, Yao
    Bian, Na
    Meng, Qingxi
    Chen, Xiang
    Yang, Changsheng
    Yang, Zengkun
    Qian, Jixian
    Zhao, Tingbao
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 2016, 9 (06): : 11566 - 11573
  • [22] Minimally invasive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis in patients with and without preoperative spondylolisthesis: clinical outcome and reoperation rates
    Alimi, Marjan
    Hofstetter, Christoph P.
    Pyo, Se Young
    Paulo, Danika
    Haertl, Roger
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2015, 22 (04) : 339 - 352
  • [23] Comparison of bilateral decompression via unilateral laminotomy and conventional laminectomy for single-level degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis regarding low back pain, functional outcome, and quality of life-A Randomized Controlled, Prospective Trial
    Ko, Sangbong
    Oh, Taebum
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2019, 14 (01)
  • [24] Clinical, Radiographic and Fusion Comparison of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion (OLIF) stand-alone and OLIF with posterior pedicle screw fixation in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis
    Wenhao Zhao
    Chuanli Zhou
    Hao Zhang
    Jianwei Guo
    Jialuo Han
    Antao Lin
    Yan Wang
    Xuexiao Ma
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 24
  • [25] A Simple Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Bilateral Decompression via Unilateral Approach versus Instrumented Total Laminectomy and Fusion for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
    Kayalar, Ali Erhan
    Onen, Mehmet Resid
    Gerilmez, Aydin
    Naderi, Sait
    TURKISH NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 29 (05) : 643 - 650
  • [26] Biomechanical Comparison of Multilevel Stand-Alone Lumbar Lateral Interbody Fusion With Posterior Pedicle Screws: An In Vitro Study
    Mok, James M.
    Lin, Ye
    Tafur, Julio Castillo
    Diaz, Roberto Leonardo
    Amirouche, Farid
    NEUROSPINE, 2023, 20 (02) : 478 - 486
  • [27] Comparison of Unilateral versus Bilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation in Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Single Level Lumbar Degenerative Diseases and Review of Literature
    Isik, Hasan Serdar
    Okutan, Ozerk
    Yildirim, Timur
    Akpinar, Elif
    Yilmaz, Ali
    TURKISH NEUROSURGERY, 2018, 28 (05) : 731 - 739
  • [28] Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with cortical bone trajectory screws versus traditional pedicle screws fixation: a study protocol of randomised controlled trial
    Feng, Zhenhua
    Li, Xiaobin
    Tang, Qian
    Wang, Chenggui
    Zheng, Wenhao
    Zhang, Hui
    Wu, Ai-Min
    Tian, Naifeng
    Wu, Yaosen
    Ni, Wenfei
    BMJ OPEN, 2017, 7 (10):
  • [29] Lumbar Endoscopic Unilateral Laminotomy for Bilateral Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Provides Comparable Clinical Outcomes in Patients with and without Degenerative Spondylolisthesis
    Yoshikane, Koichi
    Kikuchi, Katsuhiko
    Okazaki, Ken
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2021, 150 : E361 - E371
  • [30] Clinical outcomes and safety assessment in elderly patients undergoing decompressive laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective study
    Jakola, Asgeir S.
    Sorlie, Andreas
    Gulati, Sasha
    Nygaard, Oystein P.
    Lydersen, Stian
    Solberg, Tore
    BMC SURGERY, 2010, 10