Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Brazilian version of the instrument World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) for individuals with obstructive sleep apnoea

被引：0

作者：

de Oliveira, Ana Cecilia Silva ^{[1
]}

Zacarias, Laila Candida ^{[2
]}

de Souza, Clarice Cristina Cunha ^{[2
]}

Bezerra, Joao Paulo da Silva ^{[3
]}

Viana-Junior, Antonio Brazil ^{[4
]}

Sobreira-Neto, Manoel Alves ^{[5
]}

Leite, Camila Ferreira ^{[1
,2
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Fed Ceara, Master Program Physiotherapy & Functioning, Rua Coronel Nunes Melo 1127,Campus Porangabussu, BR-60430275 Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil

[2] Univ Fed Ceara, Grad Program Cardiovasc Sci, Rua Papi Jr 1232,sala 209, BR-60430235 Fortaleza, CE, Brazil

[3] Univ Fed Ceara, Dept Phys Therapy, Rua Major Weyne 1440,Campus Porangabussu, BR-60430160 Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil

[4] Fed Univ Ceara EBSERH, Hosp Univ Walter Cantidio, Clin Res Unit, Rua Coronel Nunes de Melo, BR-60430275 Fortaleza, Brazil

[5] Univ Fed Ceara, Dept Clin Med, R Alexandre Barauna 949, BR-60430160 Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil

来源：

HEART & LUNG | 2024年 / 67卷

关键词：

Obstructive sleep apnoea; International classification of functioning; disability and health; Validation study; Disability; Psychometry;

D O I：

暂无

中图分类号：

R5 [内科学];

学科分类号：

1002 ; 100201 ;

摘要：

Background: Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is a disabling health condition, and there is no disease-specific patient-reported outcome instrument to assess individuals with OSA. Objectives: To evaluate the psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) in individuals with OSA. Methods: One hundred individuals with OSA responded to the WHODAS 2.0 version of 36 items, the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and the 12-item health survey (SF-12). Internal consistency, convergent and discriminative validity, and responsiveness to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) were the psychometric properties tested. Results: Cronbach's alpha values indicate good internal consistency (0.91 - 0.73), except for the self-care domain (alpha = 0.52). Convergent validity indicated an excellent correlation (r = -0.80) between the domains of functioning and quality of life. Discriminative validity showed no association between OSA severity and functioning (p = 0.90). The responsiveness to CPAP treatment showed a large effect size (r = 0.82; p < 0.05) Conclusions: The WHODAS 2.0 instrument is valid, reliable, and responsive for assessing individuals with OSA.

引用

页码：183 / 190

页数：8