Quick recipes for gravitational-wave selection effects

被引:4
|
作者
Gerosa, Davide [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Bellotti, Malvina [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Milano Bicocca, Dipartimento Fis G Occhialini, Piazza Sci 3, I-20126 Milan, Italy
[2] INFN, Sez Milano Bicocca, Piazza Sci 3, I-20126 Milan, Italy
[3] Univ Birmingham, Sch Phys & Astron, Birmingham B15 2TT, England
[4] Univ Birmingham, Inst Gravitat Wave Astron, Birmingham B15 2TT, England
关键词
gravitational waves; gravitational-wave detectors; gravitational-wave observations; IDENTIFICATION; DETECTIONS; BIAS;
D O I
10.1088/1361-6382/ad4509
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
Accurate modeling of selection effects is a key ingredient to the success of gravitational-wave astronomy. The detection probability plays a crucial role in both statistical population studies, where it enters the hierarchical Bayesian likelihood, and astrophysical modeling, where it is used to convert predictions from population-synthesis codes into observable distributions. We review the most commonly used approximations, extend them, and present some recipes for a straightforward implementation. These include a closed-form expression capturing both multiple detectors and noise realizations written in terms of the so-called Marcum Q-function and a ready-to-use mapping between signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) thresholds and false-alarm rates from state-of-the-art detection pipelines. The bias introduced by approximating the matched filter SNR with the optimal SNR is not symmetric: sources that are nominally below threshold are more likely to be detected than sources above threshold are to be missed. Using both analytical considerations and software injections in detection pipelines, we confirm that including noise realizations when estimating the selection function introduces an average variation of a few %. This effect is most relevant for large catalogs and specific subpopulations of sources at the edge of detectability (e.g. high redshifts).
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] EFFECTS OF TOPOLOGY ON THE GRAVITATIONAL-WAVE
    EZAWA, Y
    SODA, J
    PHYSICS LETTERS B, 1994, 335 (02) : 131 - 135
  • [2] Gravitational-wave selection effects using neural-network classifiers
    Gerosa, Davide
    Pratten, Geraint
    Vecchio, Alberto
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2020, 102 (10)
  • [3] EFFECTS OF A GRAVITATIONAL-WAVE ON RELATIVISTIC PARTICLES
    FELICE, FD
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICS A-MATHEMATICAL AND GENERAL, 1979, 12 (08): : 1223 - 1228
  • [4] Environmental Effects for Gravitational-wave Astrophysics
    Barausse, Enrico
    Cardoso, Vitor
    Pani, Paolo
    10TH INTERNATIONAL LISA SYMPOSIUM, 2015, 610
  • [5] Detection of gravitational geodynamic effects with gravitational-wave interferometers
    A. V. Gusev
    V. N. Rudenko
    I. V. Tsybankov
    V. D. Yushkin
    Gravitation and Cosmology, 2011, 17 : 76 - 79
  • [6] Detection of Gravitational Geodynamic Effects with Gravitational-Wave Interferometers
    Gusev, A. V.
    Rudenko, V. N.
    Tsybankov, I. V.
    Yushkin, V. D.
    GRAVITATION & COSMOLOGY, 2011, 17 (01): : 76 - 79
  • [7] Tests of gravitational-wave birefringence with the open gravitational-wave catalog
    Wang, Yi-Fan
    Brown, Stephanie M.
    Shao, Lijing
    Zhao, Wen
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2022, 106 (08)
  • [8] Outlook for detecting the gravitational-wave displacement and spin memory effects with current and future gravitational-wave detectors
    Grant, Alexander M.
    Nichols, David A.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2023, 107 (06)
  • [9] Limiting the effects of earthquakes on gravitational-wave interferometers
    Coughlin, Michael
    Earle, Paul
    Harms, Jan
    Biscans, Sebastien
    Buchanan, Christopher
    Coughlin, Eric
    Donovan, Fred
    Fee, Jeremy
    Gabbard, Hunter
    Guy, Michelle
    Mukund, Nikhil
    Perry, Matthew
    CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM GRAVITY, 2017, 34 (04)
  • [10] The gravitational-wave physics
    Cai, Rong-Gen
    Cao, Zhoujian
    Guo, Zong-Kuan
    Wang, Shao-Jiang
    Yang, Tao
    NATIONAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2017, 4 (05) : 687 - 706