Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis to Support the Remediation of Polluted Soils: A Review of Case Studies

被引:0
作者
Abrams, Floris [1 ,2 ]
Hendrickx, Lucas [1 ]
Turcanu, Catrinel [2 ]
Sweeck, Lieve [2 ]
Van Orshoven, Jos [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Leuven, Dept Earth & Environm Sci, Div Forest Nat & Landscape, KU Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200E, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium
[2] Belgian Nucl Res Ctr SCK CEN, Impact & S Remediat, B-2400 Mol, Belgium
关键词
multi-criteria decision analysis; MCDA; remediation; soil pollution; decision support; REGIONAL RISK-ASSESSMENT; CONTAMINATED LAND MANAGEMENT; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; SITE; SELECTION; RANKING; OPTIONS; TECHNOLOGIES; SYSTEM; TOOLS;
D O I
10.3390/land13060887
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
For the successful remediation of polluted sites, priority setting among the possible remediation technologies is of major importance. The related decisions are typically conditioned by a limited set of alternative remediation techniques and multiple, often contradicting criteria. These characteristics make the decision problem suitable for applying a formalised discrete multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA). This paper reports on the outcome of a systematic review of articles published between 1995 and 2020 encompassing 43 MCDA applications to support the selection of the remediation technique for polluted soils. It focuses on the comparison between implementations of the MCDA methodology. The review identifies four gaps where progress can be made to mobilise the full strength of the MCDA methodology to support the remediation of polluted soils: (i) early stakeholder engagement, (ii) inclusion of social criteria, (iii) an informed choice of the weighting and aggregation method, (iv) and sensitivity analysis.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 94 条
  • [1] The Path From Passivity Toward Entrepreneurship: Public Sector Actors in Brownfield Regeneration Processes in Central and Eastern Europe
    Alexandrescu, Filip
    Martinat, Stanislav
    Klusacek, Petr
    Bartke, Stephan
    [J]. ORGANIZATION & ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 27 (02) : 181 - 201
  • [2] Prioritization of sediment management alternatives using stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis
    Alvarez-Guerra, Manuel
    Canis, Laure
    Voulvoulis, Nikolaos
    Viguri, Javier R.
    Linkov, Igor
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2010, 408 (20) : 4354 - 4367
  • [3] What's the point? The contribution of a sustainability view in contaminated site remediation
    Anderson, Robert
    Norrman, Jenny
    Back, Par-Erik
    Soderqvist, Tore
    Rosen, Lars
    [J]. SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 630 : 103 - 116
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2017, ISO 18504:2017
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2010, A Framework for Assessing the Sustainability of Soil and Groundwater Remediation
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2018, REVISED GUIDANCE DOC, DOI [10.1787/9789264304741-en, DOI 10.1787/9789264304741-EN]
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2006, Cost-benefit Analysis and the Environment: Recent Developments
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2012, NICOLE Sustainable Remediation Work Group Report
  • [9] A technicoeconomic approach for the selection of a site remediation strategy -: part B:: Model application
    Bage, GF
    Samson, R
    Sinclair-Desgagné, B
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2003, 31 (01) : 69 - 78
  • [10] TOPSIS-Based Screening Method of Soil Remediation Technology for Contaminated Sites and its Application
    Bai, Liping
    Luo, Yun
    Shi, Dengrong
    Xie, Xuefeng
    Liu, Li
    Zhou, Youya
    Yan, Zengguang
    Li, Fasheng
    [J]. SOIL & SEDIMENT CONTAMINATION, 2015, 24 (04): : 386 - 397