Late School Tracking, Less Class Bias in Educational Decision-Making? The Uncertainty Reduction Mechanism and Its Experimental Testing

被引:9
作者
Berger, Joel [1 ,2 ]
Combet, Benita [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Dept Sociol, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Zurich, Inst Sociol, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Univ Lausanne, LIVES Swiss Natl Ctr Competence Res, Inst Sci Sociales, Lausanne, Switzerland
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
PROSPECT-THEORY; LOSS AVERSION; PREFERENCES; INEQUALITY; RISK;
D O I
10.1093/esr/jcw054
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
A long-standing hypothesis in the sociology of education is that the timing of ability tracking impacts the inequality of educational opportunity. While earlier studies mainly focused on how early tracking impacts the primary effect of social origin (systematic performance differences due to social background), the impact of early tracking on the secondary effect of social origin (class-specific educational decision-making) has been neglected. Recently, the idea has been put forward that late tracking decreases uncertainty in educational decision-making, thus enabling more rational decision-making by lower-class individuals. Extending this idea, we propose the uncertainty reduction mechanism (URM) as a theoretical foundation; this mechanism can be derived from a decision-theoretic model on educational decision-making based on prospect theory. Moreover, we perform a first empirical test of the URM by means of a computerized laboratory experiment. The evidence is in line with the model predictions and the results support the intuition that a postponement of tracking could reduce the negative bias of lower-class individuals in educational decision-making, thereby reducing educational inequality with respect to social background.
引用
收藏
页码:124 / 136
页数:13
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Loss aversion under prospect theory: A parameter-free measurement [J].
Abdellaoui, Mohammed ;
Bleichrodt, Han ;
Paraschiv, Corina .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2007, 53 (10) :1659-1674
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Numbers, Narratives, and the Integration of Research and Theory, 2000
[3]  
Becker G., 1965, Human capital
[4]   Do people mean what they say? Implications for subjective survey data [J].
Bertrand, M ;
Mullainathan, S .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2001, 91 (02) :67-72
[5]  
Boudon R., 1974, Education, opportunity, and social inequality: Changing prospects in western society
[6]   Inequality of opportunity in comparative perspective: Recent research on educational attainment and social mobility [J].
Breen, R ;
Jonsson, JO .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY, 2005, 31 :223-243
[7]   Explaining educational differentials - Towards a formal rational action theory [J].
Breen, R ;
Goldthorpe, JH .
RATIONALITY AND SOCIETY, 1997, 9 (03) :275-305
[8]   Deciding under Doubt: A Theory of Risk Aversion, Time Discounting Preferences, and Educational Decision-making [J].
Breen, Richard ;
van de Werfhorst, Herman G. ;
Jaeger, Mads Meier .
EUROPEAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2014, 30 (02) :258-270
[9]   RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN MODELING PREFERENCES - UNCERTAINTY AND AMBIGUITY [J].
CAMERER, C ;
WEBER, M .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 1992, 5 (04) :325-370
[10]   INDIVIDUAL BEHAVIOR UNDER RISK AND UNDER UNCERTAINTY - AN EXPERIMENTAL-STUDY [J].
COHEN, M ;
JAFFRAY, JY ;
SAID, T .
THEORY AND DECISION, 1985, 18 (02) :203-228