Efficacy and safety of visepegenatide, a long-acting weekly GLP-1 receptor agonist as monotherapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomised, double-blind, parallel, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial

Background Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) remains a challenge to treat despite the expansion of various therapeutic classes. Visepegenatide (PB-119) is a once a week, subcutaneous, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) injection without the requirement of dose titration that has shown glycaemic control and safety profile in two phase 2 studies conducted in China and the United States, respectively. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of visepegenatide as a monotherapy in treatment-naive patients with T2DM. Methods This was a multicentre, double-blind, parallel, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial conducted in 30 centres in China. Adult participants (aged 18-75 years) with T2DM, glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) of 7.5%-11.0% [58.47-96.73 mmol/mol], body mass index (BMI) of 18-40 kg/m(2), and who had been treated with diet and exercise alone for at least 8 weeks before the screening visit were eligible for enrolment. After a 4-week placebo injection run-in period, participants with HbA1c of 7.0%-10.5% [53.0-91.3 mmol/mol] and fasting plasma glucose (FPG) < 15 mmol/L were randomised in a ratio of 1:1 to receive visepegenatide (150 mu g) or placebo subcutaneous injections once a week for 24 weeks. The treatment was extended to another 28 weeks during which all participants received visepegenatide. The primary outcome was a change in HbA1c from baseline to week 24. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, as NCT04504370. Findings Between November 2, 2020, and November 2, 2022, we randomly assigned 273 adult participants to the visepegenatide (n = 137) and placebo (n = 136) groups. In total, 257 (94.12%) participants, 131 (95.6%) on visepegenatide, and 126 (92.6%) on placebo, completed the double-blinded treatment period. At baseline, the mean (SD) HbA1c was 8.47% (0.81) [69.07 [8.81] mmol/mol], which rapidly decreased to 7.63% (0.80) [59.94 [8.70] mmol/mol] with visepegenatide by week 4 of treatment, and the change from baseline was significantly greater than that in the placebo group (-0.82% [-0.90 to -0.74]; [-8.99 [- 9.89 to -8.10] mmol/mol] vs -0.30% [-0.41 to -0.19]; [-3.30 [-4.50 to -2.09] mmol/mol]). At week 24, when evaluating the effects of treatment with treatment policy estimand, the least square mean (LSM change in HbA1c from baseline was -1.36 (95% confidence interval [CI] -1.52 to -1.20) [-14.84 [-16.60 to -13.08] mmol/mol] in the visepegenatide group vs -0.63 (-0.79 to -0.46) [-6.84 [-8.61 to -5.07] mmol/mol] in the placebo group. The reduction in HbA1c was significantly greater with visepegenatide than placebo (LSM difference -0.73, 95% CI -0.96 to -0.50; p < 0.001). When evaluating the treatment estimand with hypothetic policy, the LSM change in HbA1c from baseline in the visepegenatide group (-1.37 [-1.53 to -1.20]) [-14.95 [-16.76 to -13.14] mmol/mol] was significantly greater than the placebo group (-0.63 [-0.81 to -0.45]) [6.90 (-8.89 to -4.90) mmol/mol]. The LSM difference was (-0.74, 95% CI -0.98 to -0.49; [-8.00 [-10.50 to -5.50] mmol/mol]; p < 0.001]. A significantly greater proportion of the visepegenatide group achieved a target HbA1c level of <7% (<53 mmol/mol) than the placebo (50.4% vs 14.2%; p < 0.05) and stringent HbA1c level of <= 6.5% (<= 48 mmol/mol) (26.7% vs 7.9%), respectively. There was also a significantly greater improvement in FPG, 2-h postprandial glucose, homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) of beta cell function, post-prandial insulin, fasting, and post-prandial C-peptide level (p < 0.05) with visepegenatide treatment. The number (3 [2.2%]) of participants who received rescue therapy in the visepegenatide group was remarkably lower compared with those (17 [12.5%]) in the placebo group (p < 0.05). During the extended treatment period, visepegenatide consistently maintained the efficacy till week 52 confirmed by all the above endpoints. The reduction in HbA1c at week 52 was -1.39% (-1.58 to -1.19) [-15.14 [-17.28 to -13.01] mmol/mol], which was even greater than that at week 24. There was also a significant improvement in HOMA-insulin resistance (p = 0.004) at week 52 compared with the baseline value. For the placebo.visepegenatide group, which received visepegenatide in the extended treatment period, a notable decrease in HbA1c at week 52 compared to baseline was observed. The change from baseline in HbA1c was -1.49% (-1.68 to -1.30) [-16.27 [-18.37 to -14.16] mmol/mol]. The outcome was in the same direction as the visepegenatide group from the double-blind treatment period. Comprehensive benefits of visepegenatide including weight loss, improvement in lipid profile, and reduction in blood pressure have been demonstrated in this study. Visepegenatide reduced the body weight in a BMI-dependent manner that was prominent in BMI.32 kg/m(2) with a mean (SD) reduction of -4.77 (13.94) kg at week 52 (p < 0.05). Incidences of gastrointestinal adverse events were less common than other weekly GLP-1 RA in the market, and most of the adverse events were mild and moderate in nature, occurring in the first weeks of the treatment, and were transient. No serious hypoglycaemia or grade 2 hypoglycaemia (blood glucose: <= 3 mmol/L) was reported during the study. Interpretation As a monotherapy, visepegenatide provided rapid without the risk of hypoglycaemia, significant, and sustainable glycaemic control by improving islet beta-cell function and insulin resistance. Treatment with visepegenatide induced early treatment response in reducing HbA1c and maintaining glycaemic control for 52 weeks. Meanwhile, visepegenatide provided a comprehensive benefit in body weight loss, lipids, and blood pressure reduction. Visepegenatide had a better safety profile than other weekly GLP-1 RA in participants with T2DM even without the requirement of dose titration. Visepegenatide would provide an optimal treatment approach with its high benefit and low-risk balance. Copyright (c) 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/).