Experimental evidence for the efficacy of generative AI in improving students' writing skills

被引:3
作者
Ironsi, Chinaza Solomon [1 ]
Ironsi, Sarah Solomon [2 ]
机构
[1] Akdeniz Karpaz Univ, Foreign Languages & English Preparatory Sch, Lefkosa, Turkiye
[2] Near East Univ, Dept English Language Teaching, Nicosia, Turkiye
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Generative AI; ChatGPT; Writing; ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE;
D O I
10.1108/QAE-04-2024-0065
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
PurposeGiven continued debates on the potentials of newly emerging artificial intelligence (AI) like generative AI (GenAI), this study aims to contribute to corporal studies by investigating the efficacy of GenAI in improving students writing skills.Design/methodology/approachA mixed-methods research design with an experimental approach was used to elicit information from 70 undergraduate students studying at a private university. A writing course was designed and used to elicit information from the participants on the efficacy of using ChatGPT in their writing instruction.FindingsAfter collecting data through experiments and interviews, the result indicates that although ChatGPT may assist students in providing ideas in writing lessons, it may not improve their overall writing skills.Originality/valueThis study provides empirical evidence limited to the scholarly literature on the role of ChatGPT in improving students' writing skills. This study adds to scholarly discussions on the potential of ChatGPT which has recently sparked debates in academia.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 41 条
[21]  
Ironsi C.S., 2024, Facilitating Global Collaboration and Knowledge Sharing in Higher Education with Generative AI, P162
[22]   Do learners learn from corrective peer feedback? Insights from students [J].
Jiang, Xue ;
Ironsi, Sarah Solomon .
STUDIES IN EDUCATIONAL EVALUATION, 2024, 83
[23]   ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education [J].
Kasneci, Enkelejda ;
Sessler, Kathrin ;
Kuechemann, Stefan ;
Bannert, Maria ;
Dementieva, Daryna ;
Fischer, Frank ;
Gasser, Urs ;
Groh, Georg ;
Guennemann, Stephan ;
Huellermeier, Eyke ;
Krusche, Stepha ;
Kutyniok, Gitta ;
Michaeli, Tilman ;
Nerdel, Claudia ;
Pfeffer, Juergen ;
Poquet, Oleksandra ;
Sailer, Michael ;
Schmidt, Albrecht ;
Seidel, Tina ;
Stadler, Matthias ;
Weller, Jochen ;
Kuhn, Jochen ;
Kasneci, Gjergji .
LEARNING AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2023, 103
[24]   Benefits, Limits, and Risks of GPT-4 as an AI Chatbot for Medicine [J].
Lee, Peter ;
Bubeck, Sebastien ;
Petro, Joseph .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2023, 388 (13) :1233-1239
[25]   What Is the Impact of ChatGPT on Education? A Rapid Review of the Literature [J].
Lo, Chung Kwan .
EDUCATION SCIENCES, 2023, 13 (04)
[26]  
McKendrick J.H., 2020, INT ENCY HUMAN GEOGR, V1, P125, DOI [10.1016/B978-0-08-102295-5.10291-4, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-08-102295-5.10291-4]
[27]  
Mhlanga D, 2023, SSRN Electronic Journal, DOI [10.2139/ssrn.4354422, 10.2139/ssrn.4354422, DOI 10.2139/SSRN.4354422]
[28]   Privacy and artificial intelligence: challenges for protecting health information in a new era [J].
Murdoch, Blake .
BMC MEDICAL ETHICS, 2021, 22 (01)
[29]   AI-Based Personalized E-Learning Systems: Issues, Challenges, and Solutions [J].
Murtaza, Mir ;
Ahmed, Yamna ;
Shamsi, Jawwad Ahmed ;
Sherwani, Fahad ;
Usman, Mariam .
IEEE ACCESS, 2022, 10 :81323-81342
[30]   Sociocultural and constructivist theories of learning: Ontology, not just epistemology [J].
Packer, MJ ;
Goicoechea, J .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST, 2000, 35 (04) :227-241