Auditory Effects of Acoustic Noise From 3-T Brain MRI in Neonates With Hearing Protection

被引:3
|
作者
Jin, Chao [2 ,3 ]
Zhao, Huifang [2 ,3 ]
Li, Huan [2 ,3 ]
Chen, Peiyao [2 ,3 ]
Tian, Cong [2 ,3 ]
Li, Xianjun [2 ,3 ]
Wang, Miaomiao [2 ,3 ]
Liu, Congcong [2 ,3 ]
Sun, Qinli [2 ,3 ]
Zheng, Jie [2 ,3 ]
Li, Baiya [4 ]
Zhou, Xihui [5 ]
Salvi, Richard [6 ]
Yang, Jian [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] 766 Yanta West Rd, Xian 710061, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[2] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Dept Radiol, Affiliated Hosp 1, Xian, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[3] Shaanxi Engn Res Ctr Computat Imaging & Med Intell, Xian, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[4] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Dept Head Neck Otolaryngol, Affiliated Hosp 1, Xian, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[5] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Dept Pediat, Affiliated Hosp 1, Xian, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[6] Univ Buffalo, Ctr Hearing & Deafness, Buffalo, NY USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
acoustic noise; auditory function; neonate; auditory brainstem response; otoacoustic emission; THRESHOLD SHIFT; STEM RESPONSES; COCHLEAR; EAR; REPLACEMENT; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.29450
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Neonates with immature auditory function (eg, weak/absent middle ear muscle reflex) could conceivably be vulnerable to noise-induced hearing loss; however, it is unclear if neonates show evidence of hearing loss following MRI acoustic noise exposure. Purpose: To explore the auditory effects of MRI acoustic noise in neonates. Study Type: Prospective. Subjects: Two independent cohorts of neonates (N = 19 and N = 18; mean gestational-age, 38.75 +/- 2.18 and 39.01 +/- 1.83 weeks). Field Strength/Sequence: T1-weighted three-dimensional gradient-echo sequence, T2-weighted fast spin-echo sequence, single-shot echo-planar imaging-based diffusion-tensor imaging, single-shot echo-planar imaging-based diffusion-kurtosis imaging and T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery sequence at 3.0 T. Assessment: All neonates wore ear protection during scan protocols lasted similar to 40 minutes. Equivalent sound pressure levels (SPLs) were measured for both cohorts. In cohort1, left- and right-ear auditory brainstem response (ABR) was measured before (baseline) and after (follow-up) MRI, included assessment of ABR threshold, wave I, III and V latencies and interpeak interval to determine the functional status of auditory nerve and brainstem. In cohort2, baseline and follow-up left- and right-ear distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) amplitudes were assessed at 1.2 to 7.0 kHz to determine cochlear function. Statistical Test: Wilcoxon signed-rank or paired t-tests with Bonferroni's correction were used to compare the differences between baseline and follow-up ABR and DPOAE measures. Results: Equivalent SPLs ranged from 103.5 to 113.6 dBA. No significant differences between baseline and follow-up were detected in left- or right-ear ABR measures (P > 0.999, Bonferroni corrected) in cohort1, or in DPOAE levels at 1.2 to 7.0 kHz in cohort2 (all P > 0.999 Bonferroni corrected except for left-ear levels at 3.5 and 7.0 kHz with corrected P = 0.138 and P = 0.533). Data Conclusion: A single 40-minute 3-T MRI with equivalent SPLs of 103.5-113.6 dBA did not result in significant transient disruption of auditory function, as measured by ABR and DPOAE, in neonates with adequate hearing protection. Evidence Level: 2. Technical Efficacy: Stage 5.
引用
收藏
页码:2332 / 2340
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Inter-Vendor Acoustic Noise Comparison On Wide-Bore 3T MRI Scanners
    Panda, A.
    Hanson, J.
    Zhou, Y.
    James, J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (06) : 3027 - 3028
  • [42] Effects of Combining Field Strengths on Auditory Functional MRI Group Analysis: 1.5T and 3T
    Han, Kihwan
    Talavage, Thomas M.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2011, 34 (06) : 1480 - 1488
  • [43] Size-adaptable 13-channel receive array for brain MRI in human neonates at 3T
    Rios, Nibardo Lopez
    Foias, Alexandru
    Lodygensky, Gregory
    Dehaes, Mathieu
    Cohen-Adad, Julien
    NMR IN BIOMEDICINE, 2018, 31 (08)
  • [44] Comparison of intraoperative and post-operative 3-T MRI performed at 24-72 h following brain tumour resection in children
    Avula, Shivaram
    Jaspan, Tim
    Pizer, Barry
    Pettorini, Benedetta
    Garlick, Deborah
    Hennigan, Dawn
    Mallucci, Conor
    NEURORADIOLOGY, 2021, 63 (08) : 1367 - 1376
  • [45] Azimuthal auditory localization of gunshots in a realistic field environment: Effects of open-ear versus hearing protection-enhancement devices (HPEDs), military vehicle noise, and hearing impairment
    Talcott, Kristen A.
    Casali, John G.
    Keady, John P.
    Killion, Mead C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2012, 51 : S20 - S30
  • [46] Perivenular white matter lesions on SWI at 3-T MRI as a diagnostic sign to differentiate multiple sclerosis from neuromyelitis optica
    Cortese, R.
    Magnollay, L.
    De Angelis, F.
    Tur, C.
    Prados, F.
    Ourselin, S.
    Yiannakas, M.
    Miller, D.
    Yousry, T.
    Ciccarelli, O.
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2015, 21 : 471 - 472
  • [47] Learning-based 3T brain MRI segmentation with guidance from 7T MRI labeling
    Deng, Minghui
    Yu, Renping
    Wang, Li
    Shi, Feng
    Yap, Pew-Thian
    Shen, Dinggang
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2016, 43 (12) : 6588 - 6597
  • [48] Learning-Based 3T Brain MRI Segmentation with Guidance from 7T MRI Labeling
    Yu, Renping
    Deng, Minghui
    Yap, Pew-Thian
    Wei, Zhihui
    Wang, Li
    Shen, Dinggang
    MACHINE LEARNING IN MEDICAL IMAGING, MLMI 2016, 2016, 10019 : 213 - 220
  • [49] Imaging central veins in brain lesions with 3-T T2*-weighted magnetic resonance imaging differentiates multiple sclerosis from microangiopathic brain lesions
    Mistry, Niraj
    Abdel-Fahim, Rasha
    Samaraweera, Amal
    Mougin, Olivier
    Tallantyre, Emma
    Tench, Christopher
    Jaspan, Tim
    Morris, Peter
    Morgan, Paul S.
    Evangelou, Nikos
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2016, 22 (10) : 1289 - 1296
  • [50] Additive value of 320-section low-dose dynamic volume CT in relation to 3-T MRI for the preoperative evaluation of brain tumors
    Eri Hayashida
    Toshinori Hirai
    Hideo Nakamura
    Masafumi Kidoh
    Minako Azuma
    Yasuhiko Iryo
    Mika Kitajima
    Seitaro Oda
    Daisuke Utsunomiya
    Takeshi Nakaura
    Yasuyuki Yamashita
    Japanese Journal of Radiology, 2016, 34 : 691 - 699