Auditory Effects of Acoustic Noise From 3-T Brain MRI in Neonates With Hearing Protection

被引:3
|
作者
Jin, Chao [2 ,3 ]
Zhao, Huifang [2 ,3 ]
Li, Huan [2 ,3 ]
Chen, Peiyao [2 ,3 ]
Tian, Cong [2 ,3 ]
Li, Xianjun [2 ,3 ]
Wang, Miaomiao [2 ,3 ]
Liu, Congcong [2 ,3 ]
Sun, Qinli [2 ,3 ]
Zheng, Jie [2 ,3 ]
Li, Baiya [4 ]
Zhou, Xihui [5 ]
Salvi, Richard [6 ]
Yang, Jian [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] 766 Yanta West Rd, Xian 710061, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[2] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Dept Radiol, Affiliated Hosp 1, Xian, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[3] Shaanxi Engn Res Ctr Computat Imaging & Med Intell, Xian, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[4] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Dept Head Neck Otolaryngol, Affiliated Hosp 1, Xian, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[5] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Dept Pediat, Affiliated Hosp 1, Xian, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[6] Univ Buffalo, Ctr Hearing & Deafness, Buffalo, NY USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
acoustic noise; auditory function; neonate; auditory brainstem response; otoacoustic emission; THRESHOLD SHIFT; STEM RESPONSES; COCHLEAR; EAR; REPLACEMENT; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.29450
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Neonates with immature auditory function (eg, weak/absent middle ear muscle reflex) could conceivably be vulnerable to noise-induced hearing loss; however, it is unclear if neonates show evidence of hearing loss following MRI acoustic noise exposure. Purpose: To explore the auditory effects of MRI acoustic noise in neonates. Study Type: Prospective. Subjects: Two independent cohorts of neonates (N = 19 and N = 18; mean gestational-age, 38.75 +/- 2.18 and 39.01 +/- 1.83 weeks). Field Strength/Sequence: T1-weighted three-dimensional gradient-echo sequence, T2-weighted fast spin-echo sequence, single-shot echo-planar imaging-based diffusion-tensor imaging, single-shot echo-planar imaging-based diffusion-kurtosis imaging and T2-weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery sequence at 3.0 T. Assessment: All neonates wore ear protection during scan protocols lasted similar to 40 minutes. Equivalent sound pressure levels (SPLs) were measured for both cohorts. In cohort1, left- and right-ear auditory brainstem response (ABR) was measured before (baseline) and after (follow-up) MRI, included assessment of ABR threshold, wave I, III and V latencies and interpeak interval to determine the functional status of auditory nerve and brainstem. In cohort2, baseline and follow-up left- and right-ear distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) amplitudes were assessed at 1.2 to 7.0 kHz to determine cochlear function. Statistical Test: Wilcoxon signed-rank or paired t-tests with Bonferroni's correction were used to compare the differences between baseline and follow-up ABR and DPOAE measures. Results: Equivalent SPLs ranged from 103.5 to 113.6 dBA. No significant differences between baseline and follow-up were detected in left- or right-ear ABR measures (P > 0.999, Bonferroni corrected) in cohort1, or in DPOAE levels at 1.2 to 7.0 kHz in cohort2 (all P > 0.999 Bonferroni corrected except for left-ear levels at 3.5 and 7.0 kHz with corrected P = 0.138 and P = 0.533). Data Conclusion: A single 40-minute 3-T MRI with equivalent SPLs of 103.5-113.6 dBA did not result in significant transient disruption of auditory function, as measured by ABR and DPOAE, in neonates with adequate hearing protection. Evidence Level: 2. Technical Efficacy: Stage 5.
引用
收藏
页码:2332 / 2340
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Editorial for "Auditory Effects of Acoustic Noise from 3-T Brain MRI in Neonates With Hearing Protection"
    Mcjury, Mark
    Shellock, Frank G.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2024, 60 (06) : 2341 - 2342
  • [2] Letter to Editor Regarding "Auditory Effects of Acoustic Noise From 3-T Brain MRI in Neonates With Hearing Protection"
    Steckner, Michael C.
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2025, 61 (03) : 1519 - 1519
  • [3] Reply to Letter to Editor Regarding "Auditory Effects of Acoustic Noise From 3-T Brain MRI in Neonates With Hearing Protection"
    Jin, Chao
    Zhao, Huifang
    Yang, Jian
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2025, 61 (03) : 1520 - 1520
  • [4] Temporary Hearing Threshold Shift in Healthy Volunteers with Hearing Protection Caused by Acoustic Noise Exposure during 3-T Multisequence MR Neuroimaging
    Jin, Chao
    Li, Huan
    Li, Xianjun
    Wang, Miaomiao
    Liu, Congcong
    Guo, Jianxin
    Yang, Jian
    RADIOLOGY, 2018, 286 (02) : 602 - 608
  • [5] Construction and assessment of a 3-T MRI brain template
    Lalys, Florent
    Haegelen, Claire
    Ferre, Jean-Christophe
    El-Ganaoui, Omar
    Jannin, Pierre
    NEUROIMAGE, 2010, 49 (01) : 345 - 354
  • [6] DEVELOPMENT OF 3-T MRI BRAIN TEMPLATE IN KOREANS
    Song, H-J
    Hwang, J. Y.
    Jeong, H. S.
    Song, C. J.
    Han, Y.
    Park, H. W.
    Kim, J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2011, 18 : 573 - 573
  • [7] A Review of MRI Acoustic Noise Outputs and Hearing Protection Device Performance
    Steckner, Michael
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2024,
  • [8] Does 3-T fetal MRI induce adverse acoustic effects in the neonate? A preliminary study comparing postnatal auditory test performance of fetuses scanned at 1.5 and 3 T
    Camilo Jaimes
    Jorge Delgado
    Mary Beth Cunnane
    Holly L. Hedrick
    N. Scott Adzick
    Michael S. Gee
    Teresa Victoria
    Pediatric Radiology, 2019, 49 : 37 - 45
  • [9] Does 3-T fetal MRI induce adverse acoustic effects in the neonate? A preliminary study comparing postnatal auditory test performance of fetuses scanned at 1.5 and 3T
    Jaimes, Camilo
    Delgado, Jorge
    Cunnane, Mary Beth
    Hedrick, Holly L.
    Adzick, N. Scott
    Gee, Michael S.
    Victoria, Teresa
    PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2019, 49 (01) : 37 - 45
  • [10] Investigation of acoustic noise on 15 MRI scanners from 0.2 T to 3 T
    Price, DL
    De Wilde, JP
    Papadaki, AM
    Curran, JS
    Kitney, RI
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2001, 13 (02) : 288 - 293