Efficacy and safety of morphine and methadone as analgesics in a balanced anaesthetic protocol in rabbits

被引:0
|
作者
Nobre, Camila Vieira [1 ]
Uscategui, Ricardo A. R. [2 ]
Noriega, Jorge [3 ]
Gasser, Beatriz [4 ]
Pazzini, Josiane Morais [5 ]
de Almeida, Vivian Tavares [4 ]
de Nardi, Andrigo Barboza [4 ]
de Andrade, James Newton [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Vales Jequitinhonha & Mucuri UFVJM, Inst Ciencias Agr, Unai, MG, Brazil
[2] Univ CES, Fac Med Vet & Zootecnia, Grp Invest INCA CES, Medellin, Colombia
[3] Corp Colombiana Invest Agr AGROSAVIA, Ctr Invest Nus, Corregimiento San Jose Nus, San Roque, Antioquia, Colombia
[4] Univ Estadual Paulista Julio Mesquita Filho UNESP, Fac Ciencias Agr & Vet, Dept Patobiol Vet & Teriogenol, Dept Patol Vet, Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil
[5] Uniao Fac Grandes Lagos, Fac Med, Sao Paulo, Brazil
来源
REVISTA DE INVESTIGACIONES VETERINARIAS DEL PERU | 2022年 / 33卷 / 04期
关键词
analgesia; analgesic rescue; methadone; morphine; respiratory depression; ISOFLURANE; TRAMADOL;
D O I
10.15381/rivep.v33i4.23358
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
The efficacy of preventive analgesia and the cardiopulmonary effects of morphine or methadone in rabbits undergoing experimental skin surgery were evaluated and compared. Thirty-six rabbits were randomly assigned to three experimental groups: Control, Morphine, and Methadone. The rabbits received midazolam 1 mg/kg IM associated with: placebo (NaCl 0.9%) 0.05 ml/kg, methadone 0.5 mg/kg or morphine 0.5 mg/kg, depending on the experimental group. Anaesthesia was induced and maintained with isoflurane. Heart (HR) and respiratory ( fR ) rates, peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO 2 ), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and body temperature were assessed every 10 minutes. Electrocardiographic examination was performed after sedation, in the trans and immediate postoperative period. After procedure, the control group received tramadol 5 mg/kg IV. Postoperative analgesia was assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and VonFrey filament stimulation responses. All variables were compared between groups by ANOVA or Friedman. Methadone and morphine caused an increase in MAP (p=0.0112) and a decrease in HR (p=0.0001). fR and SpO 2 were reduced in the methadone group (p=0.0100). The response to Von -Frey filaments (p=0.6824) and VAS (p=0.7661) were similar between treatments, however, the control group presented a higher proportion of analgesic rescue (33%) compared to morphine (19%) and methadone (12%). Electrocardiographic variables were similar between treatments (p>0.05). In conclusion, preventive treatment with morphine or methadone was effective in controlling trans and postoperative pain in rabbits, and its cardiovascular effects were limited; however, methadone caused marked respiratory depression.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A double-blind, randomized, parallel group study to compare the efficacy, safety and tolerability of slow-release oral morphine versus methadone in opioid-dependent in-patients willing to undergo detoxification
    Madlung-Kratzer, Ekkehard
    Spitzer, Berhard
    Brosch, Renate
    Dunkel, Dirk
    Haring, Christian
    ADDICTION, 2009, 104 (09) : 1549 - 1557
  • [42] Efficacy and safety of morphine-6-glucuronide (M6G) for postoperative pain relief: A randomized, double-blind study
    Smith, T. W.
    Binning, Alexander R.
    Dahan, Albert
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2009, 13 (03) : 293 - 299
  • [43] Efficacy and Safety of Lubiprostone in Patients with Opioid-Induced Constipation: Phase 3 Study Results and Pooled Analysis of the Effect of Concomitant Methadone Use on Clinical Outcomes
    Spierings, Egilius L. H.
    Drossman, Douglas A.
    Cryer, Byron
    Jamal, M. Mazen
    Losch-Beridon, Taryn
    Mareya, Shadreck M.
    Wang, Martin
    PAIN MEDICINE, 2018, 19 (06) : 1184 - 1194
  • [44] Slow release oral morphine versus methadone for opioid use disorder in the fentanyl era (pRESTO): Protocol for a non-inferiority randomized clinical trial
    Socias, M. Eugenia
    Wood, Evan
    Dong, Huiru
    Brar, Rupinder
    Bach, Paxton
    Murphy, Sean M.
    Fairbairn, Nadia
    CONTEMPORARY CLINICAL TRIALS, 2020, 91
  • [45] Safety and Efficacy of Low-Dose Intrathecal Morphine for Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Randomized, Controlled Pilot Study
    Selvam, Velmurugan
    Subramaniam, Rajeshwari
    Baidya, Dalim Kumar
    Chhabra, Anjolie
    Gupta, Nandita
    Dadhwal, Vatsla
    Malhotra, Neena
    JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY, 2018, 34 (02) : 77 - 83
  • [46] Comparative analgesic efficacy and safety of intermittent local anaesthetic epidural bolus for labour: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hussain, Nasir
    Lagnese, Christopher M.
    Hayes, Blair
    Kumar, Nicolas
    Weaver, Tristan E.
    Essandoh, Michael K.
    Reno, Joseph
    Small, Robert H.
    Abdallah, Faraj W.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2020, 125 (04) : 560 - 579
  • [47] Comparison of the efficacy and safety of transdermal buprenorphine patch to conventional analgesics after operative fixation of extra capsular fracture of proximal femur
    Londhe, Sanjay Bhalchandra
    Patwardhan, Meghana
    Shah, Ravi Vinod
    Desouza, Clevio
    Oak, Mugdha
    Antao, Nicholas A.
    INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2024, 55
  • [48] Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Transdermal Buprenorphine Patch and Conventional Analgesics in Intra-capsular Femur Neck Fracture Post Hemiarthroplasty
    Londhe, Sanjay Bhalchandra
    Patwardhan, Meghana
    Shah, Ravi Vinod
    Oak, Mugdha
    Shah, Asit
    Antao, Nicholas
    Khot, Rahul
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2022, 56 (08) : 1363 - 1369
  • [49] Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of epidural ketamine combined with morphine for postoperative analgesia after major upper abdominal surgery
    Subramaniam, K
    Subramaniam, B
    Pawar, DK
    Kumar, L
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 2001, 13 (05) : 339 - 344
  • [50] A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the efficacy and safety of ketamine versus morphine for the treatment of acute pain
    Song, Cheng
    Wang, Dong
    Chen, Bin
    MINERVA ANESTESIOLOGICA, 2024, 90 (1-2) : 77 - 86