Effectiveness of strategies to increase adherence to colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review

被引:0
|
作者
Danieli, Inaki M. Dopazo [1 ]
Robles, Manuel [1 ]
Bellando, Maria Belen [1 ]
Picardi, Gonzalo [1 ]
Schenfeld, Yamila [1 ]
Bruzzone, Ariana [2 ]
Esandi, Maria Eugenia [1 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl del Sur, Dept Ciencias Salud, Bahia Blanca, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[2] Inst Invest Bioquim Bahia Blanca INIBIBB, Lab Biol Canc, Bahia Blanca, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[3] Univ Nacl del Sul, Dept Econ, San Andres 800, Bahia Blanca, Buenos Aires, Argentina
[4] Univ Nacl Sur, Dept Econ, San Andres 800, RA-8000 Bahia Blanca, Buenos Aires, Argentina
关键词
colorectal cancer; screening; strategies; interventions;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Coverage for colorectal cancer screening in Argentina is very low. The objective of this review is to assess and synthesize the evidence on the effectiveness of strategies aimed at increasing adherence to colorectal cancer screening among healthcare personnel and the general population at average risk. Methods: A review of systematic reviews (SRs) that evaluated the effectiveness of these strategies was conducted. Searches were performed in electronic databases, meta -search engines, the Cochrane Library, and through manual searching. Eligibility and inclusion criteria were applied, with assessment of the quality of the SRs using AMSTAR II and the certainty of evidence using the GRADE approach. Thematic synthesis was conducted based on the taxonomy of strategies proposed by Dougherty (patient/community-targeted, professionaltargeted, and other types of strategies). Results: A total of 635 studies were identified, with 36 deemed eligible and 11 excluded due to insufficient quality, resulting in the inclusion of 10 SRs. A multiplicity of strategies with varying effectiveness were identified, with the majority targeting the population. Among these, education, self -testing with specimen collection at specific locations, and reminders stood out. For professionals, only education and reminders showed effectiveness. Combined strategies demonstrated greater effectiveness than isolated strategies. Conclusions: There is more evidence on strategies targeting the population than professionals. Combined strategies showed greater effectiveness, highlighting the need to explore barriers in both the population and professionals in each specific context in order to prioritize and combine those that have proven effective and would have a greater impact.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 304
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening strategies: A systematic review
    Gheysariyeha, Fatemeh
    Rahimi, Farimah
    Tabesh, Elham
    Hemami, Mohsen Rezaei
    Adibi, Payman
    Rezayatmand, Reza
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2022, 31 (06)
  • [2] Screening strategies for colorectal cancer: A systematic review of the evidence
    McLeod, RS
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2001, 15 (10): : 647 - 660
  • [3] Components and effectiveness of patient navigation programmes to increase participation to breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening: A systematic review
    Mosquera, Isabel
    Todd, Adam
    Balaj, Mirza
    Zhang, Li
    Majano, Sara Benitez
    Mensah, Keitly
    Eikemo, Terje Andreas
    Basu, Partha
    Carvalho, Andre L.
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (13): : 14584 - 14611
  • [4] Comparative effectiveness of screening strategies for colorectal cancer
    Barzi, Afsaneh
    Lenz, Heinz-Josef
    Quinn, David I.
    Sadeghi, Sarmad
    CANCER, 2017, 123 (09) : 1516 - 1527
  • [5] Adherence with colorectal cancer screening guidelines: a review
    Subramanian, S
    Klosterman, M
    Amonkar, MM
    Hunt, TL
    PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2004, 38 (05) : 536 - 550
  • [6] Strategies to Improve Persistent Adherence in Colorectal Cancer Screening
    Sen Kew, Guan
    Koh, Calvin Jianyi
    GUT AND LIVER, 2020, 14 (05) : 546 - 552
  • [7] Adherence to colonoscopy in cascade screening of colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wu, Weimiao
    Huang, Junjie
    Yang, Yihui
    Gu, Kai
    Luu, Hung N.
    Tan, Songsong
    Yang, Chen
    Fu, Jiongxing
    Bao, Pingping
    Ying, Tao
    Withers, Mellissa
    Mao, Dandan
    Chen, Sikun
    Gong, Yangming
    Wong, Martin C. S.
    Xu, Wanghong
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2022, 37 (04) : 620 - 631
  • [8] Effectiveness of patient-targeted interventions to increase cancer screening participation in rural areas: A systematic review
    Rodriguez-Gomez, Marina
    Ruiz-Perez, Isabel
    Martin-Calderon, Sergio
    Pastor-Moreno, Guadalupe
    Artazcoz, Lucia
    Escriba-Aguir, Vicenta
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES, 2020, 101
  • [9] Factors affecting patient adherence to publicly funded colorectal cancer screening programmes: a systematic review
    Dressler, J.
    Johnsen, A. T.
    Madsen, L. J.
    Rasmussen, M.
    Jorgensen, L. N.
    PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 190 : 67 - 74
  • [10] Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review
    Khalili, Farhad
    Najafi, Behzad
    Mansour-Ghanaei, Fariborz
    Yousefi, Mahmood
    Abdollahzad, Hadi
    Motlagh, Ali
    RISK MANAGEMENT AND HEALTHCARE POLICY, 2020, 13 : 1499 - 1512