THE ACCURACY OF INTRAORAL SCAN IN OBTAINING DIGITAL IMPRESSIONS OF EDENTULOUS ARCHES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

被引:2
|
作者
Wang, Yiyang [1 ]
Li, Yaning [1 ]
Liang, Shanshan [2 ]
Yuan, Fusong [3 ]
Liu, Yunsong [1 ]
Ye, Hongqiang [1 ,4 ]
Zhou, Yongsheng [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ Sch & Hosp Stomatol, Dept Prosthodont, Natl Ctr Stomatol, Natl Clin Res Ctr Oral Dis,Natl Engn Res Ctr Oral, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ Sch & Hosp Stomatol, Ctr Digital Dent, Natl Ctr Stomatol, Natl Clin Res Ctr Oral Dis,Natl Engn Res Ctr Oral, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Peking Univ Sch & Hosp Stomatol, Ctr Digital Dent, Natl Ctr Stomatol, Natl Clin Res Ctr Oral Dis,Natl Engn Res Ctr Oral, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[4] Peking Univ Sch Hosp Stomatol, Dept Prosthodont, 22 Zhongguancun South Ave, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
关键词
Intraoral scan; Digital impression; Edentulous jaw; Accuracy; Trueness; Precision; CONVENTIONAL IMPRESSIONS; IMPLANT IMPRESSIONS; DENTAL IMPRESSIONS; TIME EFFICIENCY; WORKFLOW; FIT; TECHNOLOGY; PRECISION; TRUENESS; DENTURES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jebdp.2023.101933
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives Accuracy is a crucial factor when assessing the quality of digital impressions. This systematic review aims to assess the accuracy of intraoral scan (IOS) in obtaining digital impressions of edentulous jaws. Methods This systematic review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO ID: CRD42022382983). A thorough retrieval of 7 electronic databases was undertaken, encompassing MEDLINE (PubMed), Web of Science, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Virtual Health Library, and Open gray, through September 11, 2023. A snowball search was performed by tracing the reference lists of the included studies. The Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome (PICO) question of this systematic review was: "What is the accuracy of intraoral scan in obtaining digital impressions of edentulous arches?" The Modified Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies (MINORS) was employed to assess the risk of bias. Results Among the studies retrieved from databases and manual search, a total of 25 studies were selected for inclusion in this systematic review, including 9 in vivo and 16 in vitro studies. Twenty-one of the included studies utilized the 3D deviation analysis method, while 4 studies employed the linear or angular deviation analysis method. The accuracy results of in vitro studies indicated a trueness range of 20-600 mu m and a precision range of 2-700 mu m. Results of in vivo studies indicated a trueness range of 40-1380 mu m, while the precision results were not reported. Conclusion According to the results of this study, direct digital impressions by IOS cannot replace the conventional impressions of completely edentulous arches in vivo. Edentulous digital impressions by IOS demonstrated poor accuracy in peripheral areas with mobile tissues, such as the soft palate, vestibular sulcus, and sublingual area.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Intraoral scan bodies in implant dentistry: A systematic review
    Mizumoto, Ryan M.
    Yilmaz, Burak
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2018, 120 (03) : 343 - 352
  • [32] Accuracy of Digital Impressions Obtained Using Six Intraoral Scanners in Partially Edentulous Dentitions and the Effect of Scanning Sequence
    Diker, Burcu
    Tak, Onjen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2021, 34 (01) : 101 - 108
  • [33] Digital versus conventional implant impressions for edentulous patients: accuracy outcomes
    Papaspyridakos, Panos
    Gallucci, German O.
    Chen, Chun-Jung
    Hanssen, Stijn
    Naert, Ignace
    Vandenberghe, Bart
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2016, 27 (04) : 465 - 472
  • [34] Accuracy of single-tooth restorations based on intraoral digital and conventional impressions in patients
    Boeddinghaus, Moritz
    Breloer, Eva Sabina
    Rehmann, Peter
    Woestmann, Bernd
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2015, 19 (08) : 2027 - 2034
  • [35] Accuracy of intraoral digital impressions using an artificial landmark
    Kim, Jong-Eun
    Amelya, Ami
    Shin, Yooseok
    Shim, June-Sung
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2017, 117 (06) : 755 - 761
  • [36] In-vitro evaluation of the accuracy of conventional and digital methods of obtaining full-arch dental impressions
    Ender, Andreas
    Mehl, Albert
    QUINTESSENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 46 (01): : 9 - 17
  • [37] Accuracy of Intraoral Scanners: A Systematic Review of Influencing Factors
    Abduo, Jaafar
    Elseyoufi, Mohamed
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS AND RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2018, 26 (03) : 101 - 121
  • [38] Accuracy of digital and conventional implant impressions in edentulous jaws: A clinical comparative study
    Kernen-Gintaute, A.
    Akulauskas, M.
    Kernen, F.
    Zitzmann, N. U.
    Spies, B. C.
    Burkhardt, F.
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2025, 153
  • [39] Improved accuracy of digital implant impressions with newly designed scan bodies: an in vivo evaluation in beagle dogs
    Huang, Ruoxuan
    Liu, Yuanxiang
    Huang, Baoxin
    Zhou, Fengxing
    Chen, Zhuofan
    Li, Zhipeng
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2021, 21 (01)
  • [40] In vitro accuracy of digital and conventional impressions in the partially edentulous maxilla
    Moritz Waldecker
    Stefan Rues
    Junior Sinclair Awounvo Awounvo
    Peter Rammelsberg
    Wolfgang Bömicke
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2022, 26 : 6491 - 6502