THE ACCURACY OF INTRAORAL SCAN IN OBTAINING DIGITAL IMPRESSIONS OF EDENTULOUS ARCHES: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

被引:2
|
作者
Wang, Yiyang [1 ]
Li, Yaning [1 ]
Liang, Shanshan [2 ]
Yuan, Fusong [3 ]
Liu, Yunsong [1 ]
Ye, Hongqiang [1 ,4 ]
Zhou, Yongsheng [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ Sch & Hosp Stomatol, Dept Prosthodont, Natl Ctr Stomatol, Natl Clin Res Ctr Oral Dis,Natl Engn Res Ctr Oral, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ Sch & Hosp Stomatol, Ctr Digital Dent, Natl Ctr Stomatol, Natl Clin Res Ctr Oral Dis,Natl Engn Res Ctr Oral, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Peking Univ Sch & Hosp Stomatol, Ctr Digital Dent, Natl Ctr Stomatol, Natl Clin Res Ctr Oral Dis,Natl Engn Res Ctr Oral, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[4] Peking Univ Sch Hosp Stomatol, Dept Prosthodont, 22 Zhongguancun South Ave, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
关键词
Intraoral scan; Digital impression; Edentulous jaw; Accuracy; Trueness; Precision; CONVENTIONAL IMPRESSIONS; IMPLANT IMPRESSIONS; DENTAL IMPRESSIONS; TIME EFFICIENCY; WORKFLOW; FIT; TECHNOLOGY; PRECISION; TRUENESS; DENTURES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jebdp.2023.101933
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives Accuracy is a crucial factor when assessing the quality of digital impressions. This systematic review aims to assess the accuracy of intraoral scan (IOS) in obtaining digital impressions of edentulous jaws. Methods This systematic review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO ID: CRD42022382983). A thorough retrieval of 7 electronic databases was undertaken, encompassing MEDLINE (PubMed), Web of Science, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Virtual Health Library, and Open gray, through September 11, 2023. A snowball search was performed by tracing the reference lists of the included studies. The Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome (PICO) question of this systematic review was: "What is the accuracy of intraoral scan in obtaining digital impressions of edentulous arches?" The Modified Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies (MINORS) was employed to assess the risk of bias. Results Among the studies retrieved from databases and manual search, a total of 25 studies were selected for inclusion in this systematic review, including 9 in vivo and 16 in vitro studies. Twenty-one of the included studies utilized the 3D deviation analysis method, while 4 studies employed the linear or angular deviation analysis method. The accuracy results of in vitro studies indicated a trueness range of 20-600 mu m and a precision range of 2-700 mu m. Results of in vivo studies indicated a trueness range of 40-1380 mu m, while the precision results were not reported. Conclusion According to the results of this study, direct digital impressions by IOS cannot replace the conventional impressions of completely edentulous arches in vivo. Edentulous digital impressions by IOS demonstrated poor accuracy in peripheral areas with mobile tissues, such as the soft palate, vestibular sulcus, and sublingual area.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Techniques to Improve the Accuracy of Intraoral Digital Impression in Complete Edentulous Arches: A Narrative Review
    Leggeri, Andrea
    Carosi, Paolo
    Mazzetti, Vincenzo
    Arcuri, Claudio
    Lorenzi, Claudia
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2023, 13 (12):
  • [2] Validation of Digital Impressions' Accuracy Obtained Using Intraoral and Extraoral Scanners: A Systematic Review
    Shah, Naisargi
    Thakur, Mrinmyaee
    Gill, Shruti
    Shetty, Omkar
    Alqahtani, Nasser M.
    Al-Qarni, Mohammed A.
    Alqahtani, Saeed M.
    Elagib, Mohamed Fadul A.
    Chaturvedi, Saurabh
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (18)
  • [3] Effect of reference objects on the accuracy of digital implant impressions in partially edentulous arches
    Rutkunas, Vygandas
    Cius, Darius Jegelevi
    Pletkus, Justinas
    Skalnis, Liudas Au
    Akulauskas, Mykolas
    Eyueboglu, Tan Firat
    Ozcan, Mutlu
    Gedrimiene, Agne
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED PROSTHODONTICS, 2024, 16 (05) : 302 - 310
  • [4] Trueness and precision of digital impressions obtained using an intraoral scanner with different head size in the partially edentulous mandible
    Hayama, Hironari
    Fueki, Kenji
    Wadachi, Juro
    Wakabayashi, Noriyuki
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTIC RESEARCH, 2018, 62 (03) : 347 - 352
  • [5] Accuracy of digital implant impressions with intraoral scanners. A systematic review
    Rutkunas, Vygandas
    Geciauskaite, Agne
    Jegelevicius, Darius
    Vaitiekunas, Mantas
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2017, 10 : 101 - 120
  • [6] In vitro accuracy of digital and conventional impressions in the partially edentulous maxilla
    Waldecker, Moritz
    Rues, Stefan
    Awounvo Awounvo, Junior Sinclair
    Rammelsberg, Peter
    Boemicke, Wolfgang
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2022, 26 (11) : 6491 - 6502
  • [7] Accuracy of intraoral scanning versus conventional impressions for partial edentulous patients with maxillary defects
    Cao, Rongkai
    Zhang, Shilei
    Li, Lishan
    Qiu, Piaopiao
    Xu, Hui
    Cao, Yujie
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [8] Evaluation of intraoral digital impressions for obtaining gingival contour in the esthetic zone: accuracy outcomes
    Wei, Donghao
    Di, Ping
    Tian, Jiehua
    Zhao, Yijiao
    Lin, Ye
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2020, 24 (04) : 1401 - 1410
  • [9] Effect of Different Intraoral Scanners on the Accuracy of Bite Registration in Edentulous Maxillary and Mandibular Arches
    Rutkunas, Vygandas
    Jegelevicius, Darius
    Gedrimiene, Agne
    Auskalnis, Liudas
    Eyuboglu, Tan Firat
    Ozcan, Mutlu
    Husain, Nadin Al-Haj
    Akulauskas, Mykolas
    Pletkus, Justinas
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2024, 146
  • [10] Effects of different types of intraoral scanners and scanning ranges on the precision of digital implant impressions in edentulous maxilla: An in vitro study
    Miyoshi, Keita
    Tanaka, Shinpei
    Yokoyama, Sawako
    Sanda, Minoru
    Baba, Kazuyoshi
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2020, 31 (01) : 74 - 83