Prediction of Soil Liquefaction Triggering Using Rule-Based Interpretable Machine Learning

被引:2
作者
Torres, Emerzon [1 ]
Dungca, Jonathan [1 ]
机构
[1] De La Salle Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Manila 1004, Philippines
关键词
artificial intelligence; data mining; rough set theory; soil liquefaction triggering; decision support tool; cyclic softening; fines content; RESISTANCE;
D O I
10.3390/geosciences14060156
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Seismic events remain a significant threat, causing loss of life and extensive damage in vulnerable regions. Soil liquefaction, a complex phenomenon where soil particles lose confinement, poses a substantial risk. The existing conventional simplified procedures, and some current machine learning techniques, for liquefaction assessment reveal limitations and disadvantages. Utilizing the publicly available liquefaction case history database, this study aimed to produce a rule-based liquefaction triggering classification model using rough set-based machine learning, which is an interpretable machine learning tool. Following a series of procedures, a set of 32 rules in the form of IF-THEN statements were chosen as the best rule set. While some rules showed the expected outputs, there are several rules that presented attribute threshold values for triggering liquefaction. Rules that govern fine-grained soils emerged and challenged some of the common understandings of soil liquefaction. Additionally, this study also offered a clear flowchart for utilizing the rule-based model, demonstrated through practical examples using a borehole log. Results from the state-of-practice simplified procedures for liquefaction triggering align well with the proposed rule-based model. Recommendations for further evaluations of some rules and the expansion of the liquefaction database are warranted.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 56 条
[31]   A Comparative Study of Soil Liquefaction Assessment Using Machine Learning Models [J].
Hanandeh, Shadi M. ;
Al-Bodour, Wassel A. ;
Hajij, Mustafa M. .
GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2022, 40 (09) :4721-4734
[32]  
Idriss I.M. Boulanger., 2010, SPT-based liquefaction triggering procedures
[33]  
Ishihara K., 1985, PROC 11 INT C SOIL M, V1, P321
[34]   Prediction and Factor Analysis of Liquefaction Ground Subsidence Based on Machine-Learning Techniques [J].
Karimai, Kazuki ;
Liu, Wen ;
Maruyama, Yoshihisa .
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2024, 14 (07)
[35]   Evaluation of liquefaction potential based on CPT data using random forest [J].
Kohestani, V. R. ;
Hassanlourad, M. ;
Ardakani, A. .
NATURAL HAZARDS, 2015, 79 (02) :1079-1089
[36]   Bibliometric analysis of artificial intelligence techniques for predicting soil liquefaction: insights and MCDM evaluation [J].
Kokcam, Abdullah Hulusi ;
Erden, Caner ;
Demir, Alparslan Serhat ;
Kurnaz, Talas Fikret .
NATURAL HAZARDS, 2024, 120 (12) :11153-11181
[37]  
Kramer S.L., 1996, Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering
[38]   Evaluation Method of Highway Plant Slope Based on Rough Set Theory and Analytic Hierarchy Process: A Case Study in Taihang Mountain, Hebei, China [J].
Liu, Luliang ;
Dou, Yuanming ;
Qiao, Jiangang .
MATHEMATICS, 2022, 10 (08)
[39]   Data-Driven Meets Theory-Driven Research in the Era of Big Data: Opportunities and Challenges for Information Systems Research [J].
Maass, Wolfgang ;
Parsons, Jeffrey ;
Purao, Sandeep ;
Storey, Veda C. ;
Woo, Carson .
JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2018, 19 (12) :1253-1273
[40]   Why "AI" models for predicting soil liquefaction have been ignored, plus some that shouldn't be [J].
Maurer, Brett W. ;
Sanger, Morgan D. .
EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2023, 39 (03) :1883-1910