AI model for predicting adult cochlear implant candidacy using routine behavioral audiometry

被引:2
|
作者
Carlson, Matthew L. [1 ,2 ]
Carducci, Valentina [1 ]
Deep, Nicholas L. [3 ]
Dejong, Melissa D. [1 ]
Poling, Gayla L. [1 ]
Brufau, Santiago Romero [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, 200 1st St SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Dept Neurol Surg, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Phoenix, AZ USA
[4] Harvard Univ, Dept Biostat, Boston, MA USA
关键词
Cochlear implant; Cochlear implantation; Hearing loss; Candidacy; Audiogram; Hearing aids;
D O I
10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104337
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Objective: To describe an AI model to facilitate adult cochlear implant candidacy prediction based on basic demographical data and standard behavioral audiometry. Methods: A machine-learning approach using retrospective demographic and audiometric data to predict candidacy CNC word scores and AzBio sentence in quiet scores was performed at a tertiary academic center. Data for the model were derived from adults completing cochlear implant candidacy testing between January 2011 and March 2023. Comparison of the prediction model to other published prediction tools and benchmarks was performed. Results: The final dataset included 770 adults, encompassing 1045 AzBio entries, and 1373 CNC entries. Isophoneme scores and word recognition scores exhibited strongest importance to both the CNC and AzBio prediction models, followed by standard pure tone average and low-frequency pure tone average. The mean absolute difference between the predicted and actual score was 15 percentage points for AzBio sentences in quiet and 13 percentage points for CNC word scores, approximating anticipated test-retest constraints inherent to the variables incorporated into the model. Our final combined model achieved an accuracy of 87 % (sensitivity: 90 %; precision: 80 %). Conclusion: We present an adaptive AI model that predicts adult cochlear implant candidacy based on routine behavioral audiometric and basic demographical data. Implementation efforts include a public-facing online prediction tool and accompanying smartphone program, an embedded notification flag in the electronic medical record to alert providers of potential candidates, and a program to retrospectively engage past patients who may be eligible for cochlear implantation based on audiogram results.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Streamlining the Cochlear Implant Evaluation: Utility of Community Audiometry in Cochlear Implant Candidacy Assessment
    Shah, Ravi R.
    Jeon, Jun W.
    Naples, James G.
    Hwa, Tiffany P.
    Davis, Sherrie
    Eliades, Steven J.
    Brant, Jason A.
    Bigelow, Douglas C.
    Ruckenstein, Michael J.
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2021, 42 (03) : 402 - 407
  • [2] Audiometry-Based Screening Procedure for Cochlear Implant Candidacy
    Hoppe, Ulrich
    Hast, Anne
    Hocke, Thomas
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2015, 36 (06) : 1001 - 1005
  • [3] Machine Learning to Predict Adult Cochlear Implant Candidacy
    Patro, Ankita
    Freeman, Michael H.
    Haynes, David S.
    CURRENT OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY REPORTS, 2024, 12 (03) : 45 - 49
  • [4] Considerations for a Revised Adult Cochlear Implant Candidacy Evaluation Protocol
    Biever, Allison
    Amurao, Carly
    Mears, Megan
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2021, 42 (01) : 159 - 164
  • [5] Further Evidence for the Expansion of Adult Cochlear Implant Candidacy Criteria
    Perkins, Elizabeth
    Dietrich, Mary S.
    Manzoor, Nauman
    O'Malley, Matthew
    Bennett, Marc
    Rivas, Alejandro
    Haynes, David
    Labadie, Robert
    Gifford, Rene
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2021, 42 (06) : 815 - 823
  • [6] Development of a novel screening tool for predicting Cochlear implant candidacy
    Ngombu, Stephany J.
    Ray, Christin
    Vasil, Kara
    Moberly, Aaron C.
    Varadarajan, Varun V.
    LARYNGOSCOPE INVESTIGATIVE OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2021, 6 (06): : 1406 - 1413
  • [7] Evaluation of a Revised Indication for Determining Adult Cochlear Implant Candidacy
    Sladen, Douglas P.
    Gifford, Rene H.
    Haynes, David
    Kelsall, David
    Benson, Aaron
    Lewis, Kristen
    Zwolan, Teresa
    Fu, Qian-Jie
    Gantz, Bruce
    Gilden, Jan
    Westerberg, Brian
    Gustin, Cindy
    O'Neil, Lori
    Driscoll, Colin L.
    LARYNGOSCOPE, 2017, 127 (10): : 2368 - 2374
  • [8] Using Clinical Audiologic Measures to Determine Cochlear Implant Candidacy
    Reddy, Priyanka
    Dornhoffer, James R.
    Camposeo, Elizabeth L.
    Dubno, Judy R.
    McRackan, Theodore R.
    AUDIOLOGY AND NEUROTOLOGY, 2022, 27 (03) : 235 - 242
  • [9] Referral rates of postlingually deafened adult hearing aid users for a cochlear implant candidacy assessment
    Looi, Valerie
    Bluett, Cleo
    Boisvert, Isabelle
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2017, 56 (12) : 919 - 925
  • [10] Optimizing Care Delivery by Applying an Innovative Shared Medical Appointment Model for Determination of Cochlear Implant Candidacy
    Sydlowski, Sarah
    Donovan, Cara
    McNair, Jordan
    Hahn, Katie
    Petter, Karen
    Marks, Tina
    Haberkamp, Tom
    Nguyen-Huynh, Anh
    Podriznik, James
    Woodson, Erika
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2021, 42 (08) : E1008 - E1012