D ELAYS IN I NFORMATION P RESENTATION L EAD TO B RAIN S TATE S WITCHING , W HICH D EGRADES U SER P ERFORMANCE , AND T HERE M AY N OT B E M UCH W E C AN D O ABOUT I T

被引:0
作者
Harmon, Kevin A. [1 ]
Lee, Hansol [2 ]
Khasraghi, Bahar Javadi [2 ]
Parmar, Harshit S. [3 ]
Walden, Eric A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Arkansas, Sam M Walton Coll Business, Dept Informat Syst, Fayetteville, AR 72701 USA
[2] Texas Tech Univ, Rawls Coll Business, Informat Syst & Quantitat Sci, Lubbock, TX USA
[3] Texas Tech Univ, Texas Tech Neuroimaging Inst, Lubbock, TX USA
关键词
Brain state switching; NeuroIS; fMRI; system delays; delays; interventions; user performance; DEFAULT-MODE; WAITING TIME; ONLINE; INFORMATION; FAMILIARITY; REPETITION; DELAYS; SWITCH; WEB;
D O I
10.25300/MISQ/2023/17680
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
System delays are a major factor that harms user experience. Long delays often result in system abandonment, decreased user performance, and lost revenue for businesses. Although studies have provided important contributions on the consequences of delays, less is known about why system delays harm the user experience. Using fMRI, we examined how long system delays-compared to short delays- can change a user's brain state. Results showed that brain state switching was more likely during a long delay than during a short delay. Brain state switching was also more likely at the beginning of a task following a long delay than following a short delay. The default-mode network (brain regions associated with inattention) was more active during long delays than when users were engaged in the task. Furthermore, long delays were significantly related to worsened performance as measured in decision time in the task following a delay. This effect was mediated by brain state switching at the beginning of the task after the delay. We also attempted four different system design interventions to overcome this and found partial mitigation, but none eliminated the negative effect of delays.
引用
收藏
页码:273 / 298
页数:26
相关论文
共 65 条
  • [1] The many faces of information technology interruptions: a taxonomy and preliminary investigation of their performance effects
    Addas, Shamel
    Pinsonneault, Alain
    [J]. INFORMATION SYSTEMS JOURNAL, 2015, 25 (03) : 231 - 273
  • [2] ALLPORT A, 1994, ATTENTION PERFORM, V15, P421
  • [3] An D., 2018, Think with Google
  • [4] ACT-R: A theory of higher level cognition and its relation to visual attention
    Anderson, JR
    Matessa, M
    Lebiere, C
    [J]. HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION, 1997, 12 (04): : 439 - 462
  • [5] Separating cue encoding from target processing in the explicit task-cuing procedure: Are there "true" task switch effects?
    Arrington, Catherine M.
    Logan, Gordon D.
    Schneider, Darryl W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2007, 33 (03) : 484 - 502
  • [6] SYSTEM RESPONSE-TIME OPERATOR PRODUCTIVITY, AND JOB-SATISFACTION
    BARBER, RE
    LUCAS, HC
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 1983, 26 (11) : 972 - 986
  • [7] Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4
    Bates, Douglas
    Maechler, Martin
    Bolker, Benjamin M.
    Walker, Steven C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL SOFTWARE, 2015, 67 (01): : 1 - 48
  • [8] A COMPONENTIAL ANALYSIS OF COGNITIVE EFFORT IN CHOICE
    BETTMAN, JR
    JOHNSON, EJ
    PAYNE, JW
    [J]. ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1990, 45 (01) : 111 - 139
  • [9] Butler T. W., 1983, P SIGCHI C HUM FACT, P58, DOI [10.1145/800045.801581, DOI 10.1145/800045.801581]
  • [10] LIFE INTERRUPTED: THE EFFECTS OF TECHNOLOGY-MEDIATED WORK INTERRUPTIONS ON WORK AND NONWORK OUTCOMES
    Chen, Adela
    Karahanna, Elena
    [J]. MIS QUARTERLY, 2018, 42 (04) : 1023 - +