Comparison of Occupational Noise Exposure Assessment Methods: A Systematic Review

被引:0
作者
Makaruse, Nyasha [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Maslin, Mike [1 ,2 ]
Shai-Campbell, Ziva [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Canterbury, Sch Psychol Speech & Hearing, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand
[2] Eisdell Moore Ctr Hearing & Balance Res, Auckland, New Zealand
[3] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Braun Sch Publ Hlth, Jerusalem, Israel
关键词
Dosimetry; Exposure assessment; Hearing conservation; Noise assessment; Noise-induced hearing loss; Occupational hazards; Occupational noise; Overall accuracy; HEARING-LOSS; ACCURACY; EPIDEMIOLOGY; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1097/AUD.0000000000001479
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
Objectives:The purpose of this systematic review of publications was to evaluate existing evidence on the accuracy and precision of alternative occupational noise assessment methods, with personal noise dosimetry as the reference.Design:A structured literature search was performed in Ovid MEDLINE(R) and Embase in July 2021 and 2022. The Covidence software was used for importing articles, screening titles and abstracts, full-text review, and study selection. Two reviewers independently conducted the title, abstract, and full-text screening of eligible studies. The reporting of this systematic review was guided by the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. The quality of selected articles was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist for analytical cross-sectional studies.Results:In total, 11 studies consistent with the study selection criteria were identified out of 327 articles from the initial search. The noise-measurement methods identified in the selected studies included subjective rating through a questionnaire, expert opinion, smartwatch, sound level meter, sound level meter combined with a radio-frequency identification system, smart devices, workgroup dosimetry sampling, task-based measurement (TBM), and hybrid TBM. The hybrid method (a combination of task-based, subjective rating, and trade mean measurements) was the best alternative to full-shift personal noise-dosimetry with a negligible bias of 0.1 dB, precision of 2.4 dBA, and accuracy of 2.4 dBA.Conclusion:A variety of lower-cost TBM methods had relatively high accuracy and precision levels comparable to personal dosimetry. These findings are particularly relevant for low-income countries where occupational noise measurements should be obtained with minimal work disruptions and costs. However, it should also be noted that TBMs are greatly affected by job variation, multiple tasks, or mobile tasks.
引用
收藏
页码:808 / 815
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The physical and psychological effects of occupational noise among seafarers: a systematic review
    Febriyanto, Kresna
    Rahman, Ferry Fadzlul
    Guedes, Joana Cristina Cardoso
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH RESEARCH, 2024, 34 (07) : 2674 - 2686
  • [42] Noise exposure assessment of occupational health and safety (OHS) consultants: A preliminary study
    Hon, Chun-Yip
    Randhawa, Jaskaren
    Fairclough, Craig
    ARCHIVES OF ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH, 2022, 77 (02) : 161 - 164
  • [43] Comparison of Methods for Analyzing Left-Censored Occupational Exposure Data
    Tran Huynh
    Ramachandran, Gurumurthy
    Banerjee, Sudipto
    Monteiro, Joao
    Stenzel, Mark
    Sandler, Dale P.
    Engel, Lawrence S.
    Kwok, Richard K.
    Blair, Aaron
    Stewart, Patricia A.
    ANNALS OF OCCUPATIONAL HYGIENE, 2014, 58 (09) : 1126 - 1142
  • [44] Assessment of occupational exposures in a general population: comparison of different methods
    Tielemans, E
    Heederik, D
    Burdorf, A
    Vermeulen, R
    Veulemans, H
    Kromhout, H
    Hartog, K
    OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 1999, 56 (03) : 145 - 151
  • [45] Occupational exposure and sinonasal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Alessandra Binazzi
    Pierpaolo Ferrante
    Alessandro Marinaccio
    BMC Cancer, 15
  • [46] Occupational exposure and sinonasal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Binazzi, Alessandra
    Ferrante, Pierpaolo
    Marinaccio, Alessandro
    BMC CANCER, 2015, 15
  • [47] Occupational Noise Exposure, Bilateral High-Frequency Hearing Loss, and Blood Pressure
    Gan, Wen Qi
    Mannino, David M.
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL MEDICINE, 2018, 60 (05) : 462 - 468
  • [48] Occupational Noise Exposure and the Risk of Stroke
    Stokholm, Zara A.
    Bonde, Jens Peter
    Christensen, Kent L.
    Hansen, Ase M.
    Kolstad, Henrik A.
    STROKE, 2013, 44 (11) : 3214 - 3216
  • [49] Occupational exposure of workers to noise in a carpentry
    Ferreira, Ana
    Seco, Silvia
    Figueiredo, Joao Paulo
    Loureiro, Antonio
    Gomes, Antonio
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 31
  • [50] Dermal exposure assessment in occupational epidemiologic research
    Vermeulen, R
    Stewart, P
    Kromhout, H
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF WORK ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH, 2002, 28 (06) : 371 - 385